Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Rhinoplasty | Original Article

Role of Spreader Flaps in Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Patients Undergoing Correction for Severe Septal Deviation with Long-Term Follow-Up

Authors: Mauro Barone, Annalisa Cogliandro, Rosa Salzillo, Alfredo Colapietra, Mario Alessandri Bonetti, Marco Morelli Coppola, Emile List, Silvia Ciarrocchi, Stefania Tenna, Paolo Persichetti

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this randomized controlled study was to analyze the long-term results of patients undergoing rhinoplasty because of severe septal deviation and to evaluate the stability of results.

Materials and Methods

The study was performed with a randomized design. Patients were randomly divided into four groups: group 1, spreader flaps were used in combination with spreader grafts; group 2, spreader flaps were used alone; group 3, spreader grafts were used alone; and group 4, neither spreader flaps nor grafts flaps were used. Patients answered the Italian version of the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module. Anthropometric measurements were performed by AutoCAD for MAC. We determined the angle of deviation, and we compared the pre- and postoperative angles and compared patient satisfaction in the four groups using the Chi-squared test for unpaired data. Two plastic surgeons reviewed all the postoperative photographs of the study patients and rated the photographs on a scale of 1 to 5.

Results

A total of 264 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty between January 2010 and September 2016 satisfied the inclusion criteria and were finally enrolled in this study. Anthropometric measurements revealed statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) between the preoperative and postoperative values for the angle of septal deviation in group 1 versus the other groups. Over the long-term follow-up, group 1 maintained an angle close to 180 degrees (P < 0.01). Group 1 and group 3 were more satisfied compared with groups 2 and 4 (P < 0.01). According to evaluations by the 2 reviewers, group 1 and group 3 were the most satisfactory outcomes (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

This was the first randomized study to show that the combined use of the spreader flap and spreader graft is the best choice for a good long-term outcome and durable correction of septal deviation.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference East C, Kwame I, Hannan SA (2016) Revision rhinoplasty: what can we learn from error patterns? an analysis of revision surgery. Facial Plast Surg 32(4):409–415CrossRef East C, Kwame I, Hannan SA (2016) Revision rhinoplasty: what can we learn from error patterns? an analysis of revision surgery. Facial Plast Surg 32(4):409–415CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Calvert JW, Patel AC, Daniel RK (2014) Reconstructive rhinoplasty: operative revision of patients with previous autologous costal cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:1087–1096CrossRef Calvert JW, Patel AC, Daniel RK (2014) Reconstructive rhinoplasty: operative revision of patients with previous autologous costal cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:1087–1096CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kridel RW, Soliemanzadeh P (2006) Tip grafts in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 14(331–41):vi Kridel RW, Soliemanzadeh P (2006) Tip grafts in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 14(331–41):vi
4.
go back to reference Calvert JW, Patel AC, Daniel RK (2014) Reconstructive rhinoplasty: operative revision of patients with previous autologous costal cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:1087–1096CrossRef Calvert JW, Patel AC, Daniel RK (2014) Reconstructive rhinoplasty: operative revision of patients with previous autologous costal cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:1087–1096CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wu PS, Hamilton GS 3rd (2016) Extracorporeal septoplasty: external and endonasal techniques. Facial Plast Surg 32(1):22–28CrossRef Wu PS, Hamilton GS 3rd (2016) Extracorporeal septoplasty: external and endonasal techniques. Facial Plast Surg 32(1):22–28CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Atespare A, Boyaci Z (2016) The use of spreader grafts in revision septoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 27:1656–1660CrossRef Atespare A, Boyaci Z (2016) The use of spreader grafts in revision septoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 27:1656–1660CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Most SP, Rudy SF (2017) Septoplasty: basic and advanced techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 25:161–169CrossRef Most SP, Rudy SF (2017) Septoplasty: basic and advanced techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 25:161–169CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim DY, Nam SH, Alharethy SE, Jang YJ (2017) Surgical outcomes of bony batten grafting to correct caudal septal deviation in septoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19:470–475CrossRef Kim DY, Nam SH, Alharethy SE, Jang YJ (2017) Surgical outcomes of bony batten grafting to correct caudal septal deviation in septoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19:470–475CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA, Baker SB, Badia L, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL (2016) Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18:27–35CrossRef Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA, Baker SB, Badia L, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL (2016) Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18:27–35CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schwitzer JA, Sher SR, Fan KL, Scott AM, Gamble L, Baker SB (2015) Assessing patient-reported satisfaction with appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty using the FACE-Q appraisal scales. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(5):830e–837eCrossRef Schwitzer JA, Sher SR, Fan KL, Scott AM, Gamble L, Baker SB (2015) Assessing patient-reported satisfaction with appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty using the FACE-Q appraisal scales. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(5):830e–837eCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mladina R (1987) The role of maxillar morphology in the development of pathological septal deformities. Rhinology 25:199–205PubMed Mladina R (1987) The role of maxillar morphology in the development of pathological septal deformities. Rhinology 25:199–205PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cottle MH, Loring RM, Fischer GG, Gaynon IE (1958) The maxilla-premaxilla approach to extensive nasal septum surgery. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 68:301–313CrossRef Cottle MH, Loring RM, Fischer GG, Gaynon IE (1958) The maxilla-premaxilla approach to extensive nasal septum surgery. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 68:301–313CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Aronica R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) Linguistic validation of the “FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module” in Italian. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(3):1771–1772CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Aronica R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) Linguistic validation of the “FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module” in Italian. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(3):1771–1772CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sheen JH (1984) Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:230CrossRef Sheen JH (1984) Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:230CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ismail A, Hussein W, Elwany S (2018) Combining spreader grafts with suture suspension for management of narrow internal nasal valve angles. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 56:25–29CrossRef Ismail A, Hussein W, Elwany S (2018) Combining spreader grafts with suture suspension for management of narrow internal nasal valve angles. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 56:25–29CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Görgülü T, Özer CM, Kargi E (2015) The accordion suture technique: a modified rhinoplasty spreader flap. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(6):796–802CrossRef Görgülü T, Özer CM, Kargi E (2015) The accordion suture technique: a modified rhinoplasty spreader flap. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(6):796–802CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oneal RM, Berkowitz RL (1998) Upper lateral cartilage spreader flaps in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 37:371 Oneal RM, Berkowitz RL (1998) Upper lateral cartilage spreader flaps in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 37:371
19.
go back to reference Seyhan A (1997) Method for middle vault reconstruction in primary rhinoplasty: upper lateral cartilage bending. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1941CrossRef Seyhan A (1997) Method for middle vault reconstruction in primary rhinoplasty: upper lateral cartilage bending. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1941CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lerma J (1995) Reconstruction of the middle vault: the “lapel” technique. Cir Plast Ibero Latinoam 21:207 Lerma J (1995) Reconstruction of the middle vault: the “lapel” technique. Cir Plast Ibero Latinoam 21:207
21.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ (1999) Treatment of the nasal hump with preservation of the cartilaginous framework (Discussion). Plast Reconstr Surg 103:173CrossRef Rohrich RJ (1999) Treatment of the nasal hump with preservation of the cartilaginous framework (Discussion). Plast Reconstr Surg 103:173CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Guyuron B, Uzzo CD, Scull H (1999) A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2202CrossRef Guyuron B, Uzzo CD, Scull H (1999) A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2202CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Saedi B, Amali A, Gharavis V, Yekta BG, Most SP (2014) Spreader flaps do not change early functional outcomes in reduction rhinoplasty: a randomized control trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 28:70–74CrossRef Saedi B, Amali A, Gharavis V, Yekta BG, Most SP (2014) Spreader flaps do not change early functional outcomes in reduction rhinoplasty: a randomized control trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 28:70–74CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fayman MS, Potgieter E (2004) Nasal middle vault support: a new technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:375CrossRef Fayman MS, Potgieter E (2004) Nasal middle vault support: a new technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:375CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Boccieri A, Macro C, Pascali M (2005) The use of spreader grafts in primary rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 55:127–131CrossRef Boccieri A, Macro C, Pascali M (2005) The use of spreader grafts in primary rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 55:127–131CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Arslan E, Aksoy A (2007) Upper lateral cartilage-sparing component dorsal hump reduction in primary rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 117:990–996CrossRef Arslan E, Aksoy A (2007) Upper lateral cartilage-sparing component dorsal hump reduction in primary rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 117:990–996CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Byrd HS, Meade RA, Gonyon DL Jr (2007) Using the autospreader flap in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1897–1902CrossRef Byrd HS, Meade RA, Gonyon DL Jr (2007) Using the autospreader flap in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1897–1902CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gruber RP, Melkun ET, Woodward JF, Perkins SW (2011) Dorsal reduction and spreader flaps. Aesthet Surg J 31:456–464CrossRef Gruber RP, Melkun ET, Woodward JF, Perkins SW (2011) Dorsal reduction and spreader flaps. Aesthet Surg J 31:456–464CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Moubayed SP, Most SP (2016) The autospreader flap for midvault reconstruction following dorsal hump resection. Facial Plast Surg 32(1):36–41CrossRef Moubayed SP, Most SP (2016) The autospreader flap for midvault reconstruction following dorsal hump resection. Facial Plast Surg 32(1):36–41CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kovacevic M, Wurm J (2015) Spreader flaps for middle vault contour and stabilization. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 23(1):1–9CrossRef Kovacevic M, Wurm J (2015) Spreader flaps for middle vault contour and stabilization. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 23(1):1–9CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wurm J, Kovacevic M (2013) A new classification of spreader flap techniques. Facial Plast Surg 29:506–514CrossRef Wurm J, Kovacevic M (2013) A new classification of spreader flap techniques. Facial Plast Surg 29:506–514CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sowder JC, Thomas AJ, Gonzalez CD, Limaye NS, Ward PD (2017) Use of spreader flaps without dorsal hump reduction and the effect on nasal function. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19(4):287–292CrossRef Sowder JC, Thomas AJ, Gonzalez CD, Limaye NS, Ward PD (2017) Use of spreader flaps without dorsal hump reduction and the effect on nasal function. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19(4):287–292CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Guo BY, Liao DH, Li XY, Zeng YJ, Yang QH (2007) Age and gender related changes in biomechanical properties of healthy human costal cartilage. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22(3):292–297CrossRef Guo BY, Liao DH, Li XY, Zeng YJ, Yang QH (2007) Age and gender related changes in biomechanical properties of healthy human costal cartilage. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22(3):292–297CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Alkan Z, Acioglu E, Yigit O, Bekem A, Azizli E, Unal A, Sahin F (2012) Determining the most suitable costal cartilage level for rhinoplasty: an experimental study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146(3):377–381CrossRef Alkan Z, Acioglu E, Yigit O, Bekem A, Azizli E, Unal A, Sahin F (2012) Determining the most suitable costal cartilage level for rhinoplasty: an experimental study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146(3):377–381CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Griffin MF, Premakumar Y, Seifalian AM, Szarko M, Butler PE (2016) Biomechanical characterisation of the human auricular cartilages; implications for tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 44:3460–3467CrossRef Griffin MF, Premakumar Y, Seifalian AM, Szarko M, Butler PE (2016) Biomechanical characterisation of the human auricular cartilages; implications for tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 44:3460–3467CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Eames BF, Schneider RA (2008) The genesis of cartilage size and shape during development and evolution. Development 135:3947–3958CrossRef Eames BF, Schneider RA (2008) The genesis of cartilage size and shape during development and evolution. Development 135:3947–3958CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Role of Spreader Flaps in Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Patients Undergoing Correction for Severe Septal Deviation with Long-Term Follow-Up
Authors
Mauro Barone
Annalisa Cogliandro
Rosa Salzillo
Alfredo Colapietra
Mario Alessandri Bonetti
Marco Morelli Coppola
Emile List
Silvia Ciarrocchi
Stefania Tenna
Paolo Persichetti
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01343-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2019 Go to the issue