Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 1/2021

Open Access 01-01-2021 | Rheumatoid Arthritis | Original Research

Real-World Evidence to Contextualize Clinical Trial Results and Inform Regulatory Decisions: Tofacitinib Modified-Release Once-Daily vs Immediate-Release Twice-Daily for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Authors: Stanley B. Cohen, Jeffrey D. Greenberg, James Harnett, Ann Madsen, Timothy W. Smith, David Gruben, Richard Zhang, Tatjana Lukic, John Woolcott, Kimberly J. Dandreo, Heather J. Litman, Taylor Blachley, Anne Lenihan, Connie Chen, Jose L. Rivas, Maxime Dougados

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To provide additional clinical evidence in regulatory submissions for a modified-release (MR) once-daily (QD) tofacitinib formulation, we compared real-world adherence and effectiveness between patients initiating the MR QD formulation and patients initiating an immediate-release (IR) twice-daily (BID) formulation.

Methods

Two noninterventional cohort studies were conducted. First, adherence and two effectiveness proxies were compared between patients with RA who newly initiated tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD or IR 5 mg BID in the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental US insurance claims databases (March 2016–October 2018). Second, using data collected in the Corrona US RA Registry (February 2016–August 2019), two Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-based measures of effectiveness were compared between tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD and IR 5 mg BID, and against noninferiority criteria derived from placebo-controlled clinical trials of the tofacitinib IR formulation. Multiple sensitivity analyses of the registry data were conducted to reassure regulators of consistent results across different assumptions.

Results

In each study, approximately two-thirds of patients initiated the MR formulation. In the claims database study, improved adherence and at least comparable effectiveness were observed with tofacitinib MR vs IR over 12 months, particularly in patients without prior advanced therapy. In the registry study, the noninferiority of tofacitinib MR vs IR was demonstrated for both CDAI outcomes at ~6 months; this finding was robust across multiple sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate the value of real-world evidence from complementary data sources in understanding the impact of medication adherence with a QD formulation in clinical practice. These analyses were suitable for regulatory consideration as an important component of evidence for the comparability of tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD vs IR 5 mg BID in patients with RA.

Trial Registration

Claims database study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04018001, retrospectively registered July 12, 2019. Corrona US RA Registry study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04267380, retrospectively registered February 12, 2020.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Dreyer NA. Advancing a framework for regulatory use of real-world evidence: when real is reliable. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018;52:362–8.CrossRef Dreyer NA. Advancing a framework for regulatory use of real-world evidence: when real is reliable. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018;52:362–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388:2023–38.CrossRef Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388:2023–38.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marengo MF, Suarez-Almazor ME. Improving treatment adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: what are the options? Int J Clin Rheumtol. 2015;10:345–56.CrossRef Marengo MF, Suarez-Almazor ME. Improving treatment adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: what are the options? Int J Clin Rheumtol. 2015;10:345–56.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Taylor PC, Betteridge N, Brown TM, et al. Treatment mode preferences in rheumatoid arthritis: moving toward shared decision-making. Patient Prefer Adher. 2020;14:119–31.CrossRef Taylor PC, Betteridge N, Brown TM, et al. Treatment mode preferences in rheumatoid arthritis: moving toward shared decision-making. Patient Prefer Adher. 2020;14:119–31.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Kaulback K, Dubinsky MC. Effect of medication dosing frequency on adherence in chronic diseases. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:e22–e33.PubMed Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Kaulback K, Dubinsky MC. Effect of medication dosing frequency on adherence in chronic diseases. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:e22–e33.PubMed
17.
go back to reference van Heuckelum M, Mathijssen EG, Vervloet M, et al. Preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis regarding disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adher. 2019;13:1199–211.CrossRef van Heuckelum M, Mathijssen EG, Vervloet M, et al. Preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis regarding disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adher. 2019;13:1199–211.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cohen SB, Pope J, Haraoui B, et al. Methotrexate withdrawal in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who achieve low disease activity with tofacitinib modified-release 11 mg once daily plus methotrexate (ORAL Shift): a randomised, phase 3b/4, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019;1:E23–E34.CrossRef Cohen SB, Pope J, Haraoui B, et al. Methotrexate withdrawal in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who achieve low disease activity with tofacitinib modified-release 11 mg once daily plus methotrexate (ORAL Shift): a randomised, phase 3b/4, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019;1:E23–E34.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tanaka Y, Sugiyama N, Toyoizumi S, et al. Modified- versus immediate-release tofacitinib in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58:70–9.CrossRef Tanaka Y, Sugiyama N, Toyoizumi S, et al. Modified- versus immediate-release tofacitinib in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58:70–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Coleman CI, Limone B, Sobieraj DM, et al. Dosing frequency and medication adherence in chronic disease. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012;18:527–39.CrossRef Coleman CI, Limone B, Sobieraj DM, et al. Dosing frequency and medication adherence in chronic disease. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012;18:527–39.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kremer JM. The Corrona US registry of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34:S96–9.PubMed Kremer JM. The Corrona US registry of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34:S96–9.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Baddley JW, Yang S, et al. Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R155.CrossRef Curtis JR, Baddley JW, Yang S, et al. Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R155.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wolfe F. The epidemiology of drug treatment failure in rheumatoid arthritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995;9:619–32.CrossRef Wolfe F. The epidemiology of drug treatment failure in rheumatoid arthritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995;9:619–32.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2001.CrossRef Harrell FE Jr. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2001.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Yang S, Chen L, et al. Determining the minimally important difference in the clinical disease activity index for improvement and worsening in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67:1345–53.CrossRef Curtis JR, Yang S, Chen L, et al. Determining the minimally important difference in the clinical disease activity index for improvement and worsening in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67:1345–53.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kavanaugh A, Keystone E, Greenberg JD, et al. Benefit of biologics initiation in moderate versus severe rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from a United States registry. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56:1095–101.CrossRef Kavanaugh A, Keystone E, Greenberg JD, et al. Benefit of biologics initiation in moderate versus severe rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from a United States registry. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56:1095–101.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–9.CrossRef Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRef Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ting G, Schneeweiss S, Scranton R, et al. Development of a health care utilisation data-based index for rheumatoid arthritis severity: a preliminary study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:R95.CrossRef Ting G, Schneeweiss S, Scranton R, et al. Development of a health care utilisation data-based index for rheumatoid arthritis severity: a preliminary study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:R95.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:685–99.PubMed Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:685–99.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Murage MJ, Tongbram V, Feldman SR, et al. Medication adherence and persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review. Patient Prefer Adher. 2018;12:1483–503.CrossRef Murage MJ, Tongbram V, Feldman SR, et al. Medication adherence and persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review. Patient Prefer Adher. 2018;12:1483–503.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bonafede MMK, Curtis JR, McMorrow D, Mahajan P, Chen C-I. Treatment effectiveness and treatment patterns among rheumatoid arthritis patients after switching from a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor to another medication. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:707–15.CrossRef Bonafede MMK, Curtis JR, McMorrow D, Mahajan P, Chen C-I. Treatment effectiveness and treatment patterns among rheumatoid arthritis patients after switching from a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor to another medication. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:707–15.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sharma M, Nazareth I, Petersen I. Observational studies of treatment effectiveness: worthwhile or worthless? Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:35–42.CrossRef Sharma M, Nazareth I, Petersen I. Observational studies of treatment effectiveness: worthwhile or worthless? Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:35–42.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bird P, Bensen W, El-Zorkany B, et al. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a comprehensive review of phase 3 efficacy and safety. J Clin Rheumatol. 2019;25:115–26.CrossRef Bird P, Bensen W, El-Zorkany B, et al. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a comprehensive review of phase 3 efficacy and safety. J Clin Rheumatol. 2019;25:115–26.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Schulze-Koops H, Takiya L, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in older and younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35:390–400.PubMed Curtis JR, Schulze-Koops H, Takiya L, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in older and younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35:390–400.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:255–63.CrossRef Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:255–63.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Widdifield J, Bernatsky S, Paterson JM, et al. Serious infections in a population-based cohort of 86,039 seniors with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65:353–61.CrossRef Widdifield J, Bernatsky S, Paterson JM, et al. Serious infections in a population-based cohort of 86,039 seniors with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65:353–61.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bathon JM, Fleischmann RM, van der Heijde D, et al. Safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in elderly subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:234–43.PubMed Bathon JM, Fleischmann RM, van der Heijde D, et al. Safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in elderly subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:234–43.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Chen L, Bharat A, et al. Linkage of a de-identified United States rheumatoid arthritis registry with administrative data to facilitate comparative effectiveness research. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66:1790–8.CrossRef Curtis JR, Chen L, Bharat A, et al. Linkage of a de-identified United States rheumatoid arthritis registry with administrative data to facilitate comparative effectiveness research. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66:1790–8.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Chen L, Greenberg JD, et al. The clinical status and economic savings associated with remission among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: leveraging linked registry and claims data for synergistic insights. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:310–9.CrossRef Curtis JR, Chen L, Greenberg JD, et al. The clinical status and economic savings associated with remission among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: leveraging linked registry and claims data for synergistic insights. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:310–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Real-World Evidence to Contextualize Clinical Trial Results and Inform Regulatory Decisions: Tofacitinib Modified-Release Once-Daily vs Immediate-Release Twice-Daily for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Authors
Stanley B. Cohen
Jeffrey D. Greenberg
James Harnett
Ann Madsen
Timothy W. Smith
David Gruben
Richard Zhang
Tatjana Lukic
John Woolcott
Kimberly J. Dandreo
Heather J. Litman
Taylor Blachley
Anne Lenihan
Connie Chen
Jose L. Rivas
Maxime Dougados
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01501-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Advances in Therapy 1/2021 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.