Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2013

01-06-2013 | Hip Arthroplasty

Revision total hip replacement with a cemented long femoral component: minimum 9-year follow-up results

Authors: Kazutaka So, Yutaka Kuroda, Shuichi Matsuda, Haruhiko Akiyama

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgical revision after failed total hip replacement is a technically challenging procedure. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of revision total hip replacement using a cemented long femoral component and identify factors that influence the results.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 34 hips in 33 patients who had undergone revision total hip replacement using a cemented long femoral component between 1994 and 2001. Hip function was evaluated according to the scoring system of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Radiographic examination was performed for evaluation of stem loosening, and its possible risk factors were investigated.

Results

The mean follow-up duration was 11.3 years (9–15). Perioperative complications included intraoperative femoral cortex perforation (six hips, 18 %), dislocation (five hips, 15 %), deep venous thrombosis (one hip, 3 %) and postoperative periprosthetic fracture (one hip, 3 %). The mean preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score was 50.3 ± 14.9 vs 78.2 ± 11.5 at the latest follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier survival rate at 15 years, calculated using radiological failure or re-revision of the femoral component for any reason as the end point, was 87 or 100 %, respectively. The failure-free survival rate for the subgroup with a good-quality cement mantle was significantly higher than that for the subgroup with poor quality (p = 0.033).

Conclusions

The quality of cementation was identified as a significant risk factor for further loosening. Revision total hip replacement using a cemented long femoral component yielded satisfactory long-term results in this series.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hedley AK, Gruen TA, Ruoff DP (1988) Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented porous-coated anatomic components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:75–90PubMed Hedley AK, Gruen TA, Ruoff DP (1988) Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented porous-coated anatomic components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:75–90PubMed
2.
go back to reference Böhm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of 129 revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83:1023–1031CrossRef Böhm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of 129 revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83:1023–1031CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Raman R, Kamath RP, Parikh A, Angus PD (2005) Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87:1061–1067 Raman R, Kamath RP, Parikh A, Angus PD (2005) Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87:1061–1067
4.
go back to reference Malhotra R, Dua A, Kiran EK, Bhan S (2007) Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:355–362PubMedCrossRef Malhotra R, Dua A, Kiran EK, Bhan S (2007) Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:355–362PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M (2009) Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:65–73PubMedCrossRef Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M (2009) Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:65–73PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mertl P, Philippot R, Rosset P, Migaud H, Tabutin J, Van de Velde D (2011) Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures. Int Orthop 35:275–282PubMedCrossRef Mertl P, Philippot R, Rosset P, Migaud H, Tabutin J, Van de Velde D (2011) Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures. Int Orthop 35:275–282PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Neumann D, Thaler C, Dorn U (2012) Management of vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting. Int Orthop 36:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef Neumann D, Thaler C, Dorn U (2012) Management of vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting. Int Orthop 36:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yamada H, Yoshihara Y, Henmi O, Morita M, Shiromoto Y, Kawano T, Kanaji A, Ando K, Nakagawa M, Kosaki N, Fukaya E (2009) Cementless total hip replacement: past, present, and future. J Orthop Sci 14:228–241PubMedCrossRef Yamada H, Yoshihara Y, Henmi O, Morita M, Shiromoto Y, Kawano T, Kanaji A, Ando K, Nakagawa M, Kosaki N, Fukaya E (2009) Cementless total hip replacement: past, present, and future. J Orthop Sci 14:228–241PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schmidt J, Porsch M, Sulk C, Hillekamp J, Schneider T (2002) Removal of well-fixed or porous-coated cementless stems in total hip revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:48–50PubMed Schmidt J, Porsch M, Sulk C, Hillekamp J, Schneider T (2002) Removal of well-fixed or porous-coated cementless stems in total hip revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:48–50PubMed
10.
go back to reference Eisler T, Svensson O, Iyer V, Wejkner B, Schmalholz A, Larsson H, Elmstedt E (2000) Revision total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique. J Arthroplast 15:974–981CrossRef Eisler T, Svensson O, Iyer V, Wejkner B, Schmalholz A, Larsson H, Elmstedt E (2000) Revision total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique. J Arthroplast 15:974–981CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hultmark P, Kärrholm J, Strömberg C, Herberts P, Möse CH, Malchau H (2000) Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: prospective 7–13 years follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique. J Arthroplast 15:551–561CrossRef Hultmark P, Kärrholm J, Strömberg C, Herberts P, Möse CH, Malchau H (2000) Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: prospective 7–13 years follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique. J Arthroplast 15:551–561CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Howie DW, Wimhurst JA, McGee MA, Carbone TA, Badaruddin BS (2007) Revision total hip replacement using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:879–886CrossRef Howie DW, Wimhurst JA, McGee MA, Carbone TA, Badaruddin BS (2007) Revision total hip replacement using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:879–886CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:203–209PubMed Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:203–209PubMed
14.
go back to reference Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J (2011) A modular cementless stem versus cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 82:136–142PubMedCrossRef Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J (2011) A modular cementless stem versus cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 82:136–142PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dall D (1986) Exposure of the hip by anterior osteotomy of the greater trochanter. A modified anterolateral approach. J Bone Jt Surg Br 68:382–386 Dall D (1986) Exposure of the hip by anterior osteotomy of the greater trochanter. A modified anterolateral approach. J Bone Jt Surg Br 68:382–386
16.
go back to reference Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Br 64:17–19 Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Br 64:17–19
17.
18.
go back to reference Bolder SB, Verdonschot N, Schreurs BW (2007) Technical factors affecting cup stability in bone impaction grafting. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221:81–86PubMedCrossRef Bolder SB, Verdonschot N, Schreurs BW (2007) Technical factors affecting cup stability in bone impaction grafting. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221:81–86PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Rayan F (2009) The role of impaction grafting: the when and how. Orthopedics 32:675–679CrossRef Haddad FS, Rayan F (2009) The role of impaction grafting: the when and how. Orthopedics 32:675–679CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:55–62PubMedCrossRef Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:55–62PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH (1992) Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Jt Surg Br 74:385–389 Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH (1992) Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Jt Surg Br 74:385–389
22.
go back to reference Harris WH, McCarthy JC Jr, O’Neill DA (1982) Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64:1063–1067 Harris WH, McCarthy JC Jr, O’Neill DA (1982) Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64:1063–1067
23.
go back to reference Turner RH, Mattingly DA, Scheller A (1987) Femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using a long-stem femoral component clinical and radiographic analysis. J Arthroplast 2:247–258CrossRef Turner RH, Mattingly DA, Scheller A (1987) Femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using a long-stem femoral component clinical and radiographic analysis. J Arthroplast 2:247–258CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ (1993) Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 75:14–21 Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ (1993) Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 75:14–21
25.
go back to reference Head WC, Malinin TI, Mallory TH, Emerson RH Jr (1998) Onlay cortical allografting for the femur. Orthop Clin North Am 29:307–312PubMedCrossRef Head WC, Malinin TI, Mallory TH, Emerson RH Jr (1998) Onlay cortical allografting for the femur. Orthop Clin North Am 29:307–312PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Retpen JB, Jensen JS (1993) Risk factors for recurrent aseptic loosening of the femoral component after cemented revision. J Arthroplast 8:471–478CrossRef Retpen JB, Jensen JS (1993) Risk factors for recurrent aseptic loosening of the femoral component after cemented revision. J Arthroplast 8:471–478CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mann KA, Ayers DC, Damron TA (1997) Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision. J Orthop Res 15:62–68PubMedCrossRef Mann KA, Ayers DC, Damron TA (1997) Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision. J Orthop Res 15:62–68PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sierra RJ, Charity J, Tsiridis E, Timperley JA, Gie GA (2008) The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:1330–1336CrossRef Sierra RJ, Charity J, Tsiridis E, Timperley JA, Gie GA (2008) The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:1330–1336CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979–1982. A 2–5 year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67:1074–1085 Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979–1982. A 2–5 year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67:1074–1085
30.
go back to reference Strömberg CN, Herberts P (1996) Cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 55 years old. A multicenter evaluation of second-generation cementing technique. J Arthroplast 11:489–499CrossRef Strömberg CN, Herberts P (1996) Cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 55 years old. A multicenter evaluation of second-generation cementing technique. J Arthroplast 11:489–499CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1985) Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67:517–526 Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1985) Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67:517–526
32.
go back to reference Herberts P, Malchau H (1997) How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:44–60PubMedCrossRef Herberts P, Malchau H (1997) How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:44–60PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB (1988) Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:214–220PubMed Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB (1988) Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:214–220PubMed
34.
go back to reference Pierson JL, Harris WH (1995) Effect of improved cementing techniques on the longevity of fixation in revision cemented femoral arthroplasties. Average 8.8 year follow-up period. J Arthroplast 10:581–591CrossRef Pierson JL, Harris WH (1995) Effect of improved cementing techniques on the longevity of fixation in revision cemented femoral arthroplasties. Average 8.8 year follow-up period. J Arthroplast 10:581–591CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Mall NA, Nunley RM, Zhu JJ, Maloney WJ, Barrack RL, Clohisy JC (2011) The incidence of acetabular osteolysis in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:372–381PubMedCrossRef Mall NA, Nunley RM, Zhu JJ, Maloney WJ, Barrack RL, Clohisy JC (2011) The incidence of acetabular osteolysis in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:372–381PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Revision total hip replacement with a cemented long femoral component: minimum 9-year follow-up results
Authors
Kazutaka So
Yutaka Kuroda
Shuichi Matsuda
Haruhiko Akiyama
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1733-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2013 Go to the issue