Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Revision of the Deficient Proximal Femur With a Proximal Femoral Allograft

Authors: Oleg Safir, MD, FRCSC, Catherine F. Kellett, BSc, BM, BCh, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Michael Flint, BHB, MB, ChB, FRACS, David Backstein, MD, MEd, FRCS(C), Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCS(C), O.Ont

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Substantial bone loss is frequently encountered with revision hip arthroplasty. A proximal femoral allograft may be used to reconstitute bone stock in the multiply revised femur with segmental bone loss of greater than 5 cm. We retrospectively reviewed 92 patients (93 hips) who underwent such proximal femoral allografts. The average age at the surgery was 61 years. The average number of previous revision procedures was 2.5. Six patients were lost to followup. Thirty-four of 36 deceased patients had the original proximal femoral allograft at the time of death. The minimum followup for the 50 remaining patients was 15 years (average, 16.2 years; range, 15–22 years). Analysis included survivorship and radiographic assessment. Of the 50 patients reviewed, two had a failed reconstruction due to infection, six for aseptic loosening, three for nonunion, and four for dislocation. Revision of the proximal femoral allograft for all reasons excluding the acetabulum was performed in seven patients. At last followup, 42 patients (84%) had a well-functioning construct. Proximal femoral allograft for revision hip arthroplasty in femoral segmental bone loss is a durable alternative in most patients for a complex problem.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alexeeff M, Mahomed N, Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross A. Structural allograft in two-stage revisions for failed septic hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:213–216.PubMed Alexeeff M, Mahomed N, Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross A. Structural allograft in two-stage revisions for failed septic hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:213–216.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Blackley HR, Davis AM, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip: a nine to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:346–354.PubMed Blackley HR, Davis AM, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip: a nine to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:346–354.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chandler H, Clark J, Murphy S, McCarthy J, Penenberg B, Danylchuk K, Roehr B. Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:67–74.PubMed Chandler H, Clark J, Murphy S, McCarthy J, Penenberg B, Danylchuk K, Roehr B. Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:67–74.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Duncan CP, Masterson EL, Masri BA. Impaction allografting with cement for the management of femoral bone loss. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:297–305.PubMedCrossRef Duncan CP, Masterson EL, Masri BA. Impaction allografting with cement for the management of femoral bone loss. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:297–305.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fox EJ, Hau MA, Gebhardt MC, Hornicek FJ, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Long-term follow up of proximal femoral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:106–113.PubMedCrossRef Fox EJ, Hau MA, Gebhardt MC, Hornicek FJ, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Long-term follow up of proximal femoral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:106–113.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gerrand CH, Bell RS, Griffin AM, Wunder JS. Instability after major tumor resection: prevention and treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:697–710, ix-x.PubMedCrossRef Gerrand CH, Bell RS, Griffin AM, Wunder JS. Instability after major tumor resection: prevention and treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:697–710, ix-x.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Glassman AH, Engh CA, Bobyn JD. A technique of extensile exposure for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:11–21.PubMedCrossRef Glassman AH, Engh CA, Bobyn JD. A technique of extensile exposure for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:11–21.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Goodman S, Pressman A, Saastamoinen H, Gross A. Modified sliding trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:1039–1041.PubMedCrossRef Goodman S, Pressman A, Saastamoinen H, Gross A. Modified sliding trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:1039–1041.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Graham NM, Stockley I. The use of structural proximal femoral allografts in complex revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:337–343.PubMedCrossRef Graham NM, Stockley I. The use of structural proximal femoral allografts in complex revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:337–343.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gross AE, Blackley H, Wong P, Saleh K, Woodgate I. The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Instr Course Lect. 2002;51:103–113.PubMed Gross AE, Blackley H, Wong P, Saleh K, Woodgate I. The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Instr Course Lect. 2002;51:103–113.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:313–317.PubMedCrossRef Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:313–317.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1998;21:999–1001.PubMed Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1998;21:999–1001.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.PubMed Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements: a minimum review of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:830–836.PubMedCrossRef Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements: a minimum review of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:830–836.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Instructional course lectures, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Femoral bone loss in patients managed with revision hip replacement: results of circumferential allograft replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:420–436.CrossRef Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Instructional course lectures, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Femoral bone loss in patients managed with revision hip replacement: results of circumferential allograft replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:420–436.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Circumferential allograft replacement of the proximal femur: a critical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:98–107.PubMedCrossRef Haddad FS, Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Circumferential allograft replacement of the proximal femur: a critical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:98–107.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RS. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement: evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:809–817.PubMed Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RS. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement: evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:809–817.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Head WC, Hillyard JM, Emerson RH Jr, Peters PC Jr. Proximal femoral allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1993;4:92–98.PubMed Head WC, Hillyard JM, Emerson RH Jr, Peters PC Jr. Proximal femoral allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1993;4:92–98.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kellett CF, Boscainos PJ, Maury A, Pressman A, Cayen B, Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross A. Proximal femoral allograft treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 2, Pt 1):68–79.PubMedCrossRef Kellett CF, Boscainos PJ, Maury A, Pressman A, Cayen B, Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross A. Proximal femoral allograft treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 2, Pt 1):68–79.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Collin P, Thomazeau H. Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:197–211.PubMedCrossRef Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Collin P, Thomazeau H. Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:197–211.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lind M, Krarup N, Mikkelsen S, Horlyck E. Exchange impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty: results in 87 cases after 3.6 years’ follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:158–164.PubMedCrossRef Lind M, Krarup N, Mikkelsen S, Horlyck E. Exchange impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty: results in 87 cases after 3.6 years’ follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:158–164.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Linder L. Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur: histological and radiographic observations in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:543–552.PubMedCrossRef Linder L. Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur: histological and radiographic observations in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:543–552.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Malkani AL, Sim FH, Chao EY. Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:727–733.PubMed Malkani AL, Sim FH, Chao EY. Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:727–733.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Masterson EL, Duncan CP. Subsidence and the cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. Orthopedics. 1997;20:821–822.PubMed Masterson EL, Duncan CP. Subsidence and the cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. Orthopedics. 1997;20:821–822.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1834–1841.PubMed Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1834–1841.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Morgan HD, McCallister W, Cho MS, Casnellie MT, Leopold SS. Impaction allografting for femoral component revision: clinical update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:160–168.PubMedCrossRef Morgan HD, McCallister W, Cho MS, Casnellie MT, Leopold SS. Impaction allografting for femoral component revision: clinical update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:160–168.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Aribindi R. Hip replacement: treatment of femoral bone loss using distal bypass fixation. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:119–130.PubMed Paprosky WG, Aribindi R. Hip replacement: treatment of femoral bone loss using distal bypass fixation. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:119–130.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230–242.PubMedCrossRef Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230–242.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Parvizi J, Sim FH. Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:169–175.PubMedCrossRef Parvizi J, Sim FH. Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:169–175.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Davis A, Resig S, Gross AE. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1040–1046.PubMed Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Davis A, Resig S, Gross AE. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1040–1046.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Tomford WM. Disease transmission, sterilization and the clinical use of musculoskeletal tissue allografts. In: Tomford WM, ed. Musculoskeletal Tissue Banking. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993:209–230. Tomford WM. Disease transmission, sterilization and the clinical use of musculoskeletal tissue allografts. In: Tomford WM, ed. Musculoskeletal Tissue Banking. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993:209–230.
32.
go back to reference van Biezen FC, ten Have BL, Verhaar JA. Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery: 21 hips followed for 41–85 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:135–142.PubMedCrossRef van Biezen FC, ten Have BL, Verhaar JA. Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery: 21 hips followed for 41–85 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:135–142.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT. Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:207–223.PubMedCrossRef Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT. Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:207–223.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Zmolek JC, Dorr LD. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the use of solid allograft. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:361–370.PubMedCrossRef Zmolek JC, Dorr LD. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the use of solid allograft. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:361–370.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Revision of the Deficient Proximal Femur With a Proximal Femoral Allograft
Authors
Oleg Safir, MD, FRCSC
Catherine F. Kellett, BSc, BM, BCh, FRCS(Tr & Orth)
Michael Flint, BHB, MB, ChB, FRACS
David Backstein, MD, MEd, FRCS(C)
Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCS(C), O.Ont
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0573-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2009 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Acetabular Loosening Using an Extended Offset Polyethylene Liner

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Acetabular Orientation: Anterolateral Approach in the Supine Position