Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Acetabular Orientation: Anterolateral Approach in the Supine Position

Authors: Matthew S. Austin, MD, Richard H. Rothman, MD, PhD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The anterolateral approach in the supine position provides excellent visualization of the acetabulum. The main advantage of the approach, a low dislocation rate, has been demonstrated in the literature, while the purported disadvantage of abductor dysfunction has not been clearly delineated in the literature. The technique requires meticulous attention to preservation of the gluteus medius and minimus tendons. Impingement and dislocation are avoided by careful attention to the preparation of acetabulum, critical assessment of the implanted components, and intraoperative trialing. Leg lengths are assessed through direct palpation of the malleoli. Routine use of postoperative hip precautions is not necessary when this approach is utilized. The anterolateral approach in the supine position allows for a reproducible result with a low dislocation rate.
Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barber TC, Roger DJ, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ. Early outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the direct lateral vs. the posterior surgical approach. Orthopedics. 1996;19:873–875. Barber TC, Roger DJ, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ. Early outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the direct lateral vs. the posterior surgical approach. Orthopedics. 1996;19:873–875.
2.
go back to reference Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:89–99.PubMed Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:89–99.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Demos HA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW. Instability in primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct lateral approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:168–180.PubMedCrossRef Demos HA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW. Instability in primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct lateral approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:168–180.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell Jr CW. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315–321.PubMed D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell Jr CW. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315–321.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Downing ND, Clark DI, Hutchinson JW, Coclough K, Howard PW. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty:a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:215–220.PubMedCrossRef Downing ND, Clark DI, Hutchinson JW, Coclough K, Howard PW. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty:a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:215–220.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Frndak PA, Mallory TH, Lombardi Jr AV. Translateral surgical approach to the hip. The abductor muscle “split.” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;295:135–141.PubMed Frndak PA, Mallory TH, Lombardi Jr AV. Translateral surgical approach to the hip. The abductor muscle “split.” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;295:135–141.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Horwitz BR, Rockowitz NL, Goll SR, Booth Jr RE, Balderston RA, Rothman RH, Cohn JC. A prospective randomized comparison of two surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;291:154–163.PubMed Horwitz BR, Rockowitz NL, Goll SR, Booth Jr RE, Balderston RA, Rothman RH, Cohn JC. A prospective randomized comparison of two surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;291:154–163.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19;3:CD003828. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19;3:CD003828.
9.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.PubMed Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Madsen MS, Ritter MA, Morris HH, Meding JB, Berend ME, Faris PM, Vardaxis VG. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:44–50.PubMedCrossRef Madsen MS, Ritter MA, Morris HH, Meding JB, Berend ME, Faris PM, Vardaxis VG. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:44–50.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mallory TH, Lombardi Jr AV, Fada RA, Herrington SM, Eberle RW. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral abductor split approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;358:166–172.PubMedCrossRef Mallory TH, Lombardi Jr AV, Fada RA, Herrington SM, Eberle RW. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral abductor split approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;358:166–172.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marumaya M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield award:Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur:anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:52–65.CrossRef Marumaya M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield award:Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur:anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:52–65.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:46–53.PubMedCrossRef Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:46–53.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Moskal JT, Mann III JW. A modified direct lateral approach for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty:a prospective analysis of 453 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:255–266.PubMedCrossRef Moskal JT, Mann III JW. A modified direct lateral approach for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty:a prospective analysis of 453 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:255–266.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:228–232.PubMed Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:228–232.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Koyama T, Takao M, Yoshikawa H. Influence of component positions on dislocation. Computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:162–166.PubMedCrossRef Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Koyama T, Takao M, Yoshikawa H. Influence of component positions on dislocation. Computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:162–166.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Peak EL, Parvizi J, Ciminiello M, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. The role of patient restrictions in reducing the prevalence of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:247–253.PubMedCrossRef Peak EL, Parvizi J, Ciminiello M, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. The role of patient restrictions in reducing the prevalence of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:247–253.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop. 1991;6:17–25.CrossRef Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop. 1991;6:17–25.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;385:95–99.PubMedCrossRef Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;385:95–99.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of post-operative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomized trials. BMJ. 2000;321:1493.PubMedCrossRef Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of post-operative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomized trials. BMJ. 2000;321:1493.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Usrey MM, Noble PC, Rudner LJ, Conditt MA, Birman MV, Santore RF, Mathis KB. Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners? J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:65–71.PubMedCrossRef Usrey MM, Noble PC, Rudner LJ, Conditt MA, Birman MV, Santore RF, Mathis KB. Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners? J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:65–71.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vicar AJ, Coleman CR. A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;188:152–159.PubMed Vicar AJ, Coleman CR. A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;188:152–159.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Walter WL, Insley GM, Walter WK, Tuke MA. Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Stripe wear. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:402–413.CrossRef Walter WL, Insley GM, Walter WK, Tuke MA. Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Stripe wear. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:402–413.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Walter WL, O’Toole GC, Walter WK, Ellis A, Zicat BA. Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips. The importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22:496–503. Walter WL, O’Toole GC, Walter WK, Ellis A, Zicat BA. Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips. The importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22:496–503.
25.
go back to reference Yamaguchi M, Akisue T, Bauer TW, Hasimoto Y. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:305–313.PubMedCrossRef Yamaguchi M, Akisue T, Bauer TW, Hasimoto Y. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:305–313.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Acetabular Orientation: Anterolateral Approach in the Supine Position
Authors
Matthew S. Austin, MD
Richard H. Rothman, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0523-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2009 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Acetabular Loosening Using an Extended Offset Polyethylene Liner

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

The Role of Arthroscopy in Evaluation of Painful Hip Arthroplasty

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Revision of the Deficient Proximal Femur With a Proximal Femoral Allograft