Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2017

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Review

Reviewing the quality, health benefit and value for money of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer

Authors: Xavier Ghislain Léon Victor Pouwels, Bram L. T. Ramaekers, Manuela A. Joore

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To provide an overview of model characteristics and outcomes of model-based economic evaluations concerning chemotherapy and targeted therapy (TT) for metastatic breast cancer (MBC); to assess the quality of the studies; to analyse the association between model characteristics and study quality and outcomes.

Methods

PubMED and NHS EED were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: English or Dutch language, model-based economic evaluation, chemotherapy or TT as intervention, population diagnosed with MBC, published between 2000 and 2014, reporting life years (LY) or quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. General characteristics, model characteristics and outcomes of the studies were extracted. Quality of the studies was assessed through a checklist.

Results

24 studies were included, considering 50 comparisons (20 concerning chemotherapy and 30 TT). Seven comparisons were represented in multiple studies. A health state-transition model including the following health states: stable/progression-free disease, progression and death was used in 18 studies. Studies fulfilled on average 14 out of the 26 items of the quality checklist, mostly due to a lack of transparency in reporting. Thirty-one per cent of the incremental net monetary benefit was positive. TT led to higher iQALY gained, and industry-sponsored studies reported more favourable cost-effectiveness outcomes.

Conclusions

The development of a disease-specific reference model would improve the transparency and quality of model-based cost-effectiveness assessments for MBC treatments. Incremental health benefits increased over time, but were outweighed by the increased treatment costs. Consequently, increased health benefits led to lower value for money.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Drummond M, McGuire A (2001) Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford Drummond M, McGuire A (2001) Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6.
go back to reference Frederix GW, van Hasselt JG, Schellens JH, Hovels AM, Raaijmakers JA, Huitema AD et al (2014) The impact of structural uncertainty on cost-effectiveness models for adjuvant endocrine breast cancer treatments: the need for disease-specific model standardization and improved guidance. PharmacoEconomics 32(1):47–61. doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0106-x CrossRefPubMed Frederix GW, van Hasselt JG, Schellens JH, Hovels AM, Raaijmakers JA, Huitema AD et al (2014) The impact of structural uncertainty on cost-effectiveness models for adjuvant endocrine breast cancer treatments: the need for disease-specific model standardization and improved guidance. PharmacoEconomics 32(1):47–61. doi:10.​1007/​s40273-013-0106-x CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Alba E, Ciruelos E, Lopez R, Lopez-Vega JM, Lluch A, Martin M et al (2013) Cost-utility analysis of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in monotherapy in pretreated metastatic breast cancer in Spain. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 13(3):381–391. doi:10.1586/erp.13.18 CrossRefPubMed Alba E, Ciruelos E, Lopez R, Lopez-Vega JM, Lluch A, Martin M et al (2013) Cost-utility analysis of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in monotherapy in pretreated metastatic breast cancer in Spain. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 13(3):381–391. doi:10.​1586/​erp.​13.​18 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Delea T, Amdahl J, Chit A, Amonkar M (2013) Cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus letrozole in her2-positive, hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer in Canada. Curr Oncol 20(5):e371CrossRef Delea T, Amdahl J, Chit A, Amonkar M (2013) Cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus letrozole in her2-positive, hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer in Canada. Curr Oncol 20(5):e371CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Afzali HH, Karnon J, Merlin T (2013) Improving the accuracy and comparability of model-based economic evaluations of health technologies for reimbursement decisions: a methodological framework for the development of reference models. Med Decis Mak 33(3):325–332. doi:10.1177/0272989x12458160 CrossRef Afzali HH, Karnon J, Merlin T (2013) Improving the accuracy and comparability of model-based economic evaluations of health technologies for reimbursement decisions: a methodological framework for the development of reference models. Med Decis Mak 33(3):325–332. doi:10.​1177/​0272989x12458160​ CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hind D, Ward S, De Nigris E, Simpson E, Carroll C, Wyld L (2007) Hormonal therapies for early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 11(26):1–134CrossRef Hind D, Ward S, De Nigris E, Simpson E, Carroll C, Wyld L (2007) Hormonal therapies for early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 11(26):1–134CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Frederix GWJ, Severens JL, Hövels AM, Raaijmakers JAM, Schellens JHM (2012) Reviewing the cost-effectiveness of endocrine early breast cancer therapies: influence of differences in modeling methods on outcomes. Value Health 15(1):94–105. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.003 CrossRefPubMed Frederix GWJ, Severens JL, Hövels AM, Raaijmakers JAM, Schellens JHM (2012) Reviewing the cost-effectiveness of endocrine early breast cancer therapies: influence of differences in modeling methods on outcomes. Value Health 15(1):94–105. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​08.​003 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Karnon J (2006) Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: a review of cost considerations and cost effectiveness. PharmacoEconomics 24(3):215–232CrossRef Karnon J (2006) Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: a review of cost considerations and cost effectiveness. PharmacoEconomics 24(3):215–232CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Evers S, Goossens M, de Vet H, van Tulder M, Ament A (2005) Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21(2):240–245PubMed Evers S, Goossens M, de Vet H, van Tulder M, Ament A (2005) Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21(2):240–245PubMed
30.
go back to reference Soto J (2002) Health economic evaluations using decision analytic modeling. Principles and practices–utilization of a checklist to their development and appraisal. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 18(1):94–111PubMed Soto J (2002) Health economic evaluations using decision analytic modeling. Principles and practices–utilization of a checklist to their development and appraisal. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 18(1):94–111PubMed
31.
go back to reference Fleeman N, Bagust A, Boland A, Dickson R, Dundar Y, Moonan M et al (2011) Lapatinib and trastuzumab in combination with an aromatase inhibitor for the first-line treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer which over-expresses human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2): a systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess 15(42):1–93. doi:10.3310/hta15420 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fleeman N, Bagust A, Boland A, Dickson R, Dundar Y, Moonan M et al (2011) Lapatinib and trastuzumab in combination with an aromatase inhibitor for the first-line treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer which over-expresses human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2): a systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess 15(42):1–93. doi:10.​3310/​hta15420 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Brown RE, Hutton J, Burrell A (2001) Cost effectiveness of treatment options in advanced breast cancer in the UK. PharmacoEconomics 19(11):1091–1102CrossRef Brown RE, Hutton J, Burrell A (2001) Cost effectiveness of treatment options in advanced breast cancer in the UK. PharmacoEconomics 19(11):1091–1102CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Dedes KJ, Matter-Walstra K, Schwenkglenks M, Pestalozzi BC, Fink D, Brauchli P et al (2009) Bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel for HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: an economic evaluation. Eur J Cancer 45(8):1397–1406. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.12.016 CrossRefPubMed Dedes KJ, Matter-Walstra K, Schwenkglenks M, Pestalozzi BC, Fink D, Brauchli P et al (2009) Bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel for HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: an economic evaluation. Eur J Cancer 45(8):1397–1406. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2008.​12.​016 CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Delea TE, Hawkes C, Amonkar MM, Lykopoulos K, Johnston SR (2013) cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus letrozole in post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Care 8(6):429–437. doi:10.1159/000357316 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Delea TE, Hawkes C, Amonkar MM, Lykopoulos K, Johnston SR (2013) cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus letrozole in post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Care 8(6):429–437. doi:10.​1159/​000357316 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Delea TE, Tappenden P, Sofrygin O, Browning D, Amonkar MM, Karnon J et al (2012) Cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus capecitabine in women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer who have received prior therapy with trastuzumab. Eur J Health Econ 13(5):589–603. doi:10.1007/s10198-011-0323-1 CrossRefPubMed Delea TE, Tappenden P, Sofrygin O, Browning D, Amonkar MM, Karnon J et al (2012) Cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus capecitabine in women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer who have received prior therapy with trastuzumab. Eur J Health Econ 13(5):589–603. doi:10.​1007/​s10198-011-0323-1 CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Frias C, Cortes J, Segui MA, Oyaguez I, Casado MA (2010) Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 12(10):692–700. doi:10.1007/s12094-010-0579-4 CrossRefPubMed Frias C, Cortes J, Segui MA, Oyaguez I, Casado MA (2010) Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 12(10):692–700. doi:10.​1007/​s12094-010-0579-4 CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Lazzaro C, Bordonaro R, Cognetti F, Fabi A, De Placido S, Arpino G et al (2013) An Italian cost-effectiveness analysis of paclitaxel albumin (nab-paclitaxel) versus conventional paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer patients: the COSTANza study. ClinicoEcon Outcomes Res 5:125CrossRef Lazzaro C, Bordonaro R, Cognetti F, Fabi A, De Placido S, Arpino G et al (2013) An Italian cost-effectiveness analysis of paclitaxel albumin (nab-paclitaxel) versus conventional paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer patients: the COSTANza study. ClinicoEcon Outcomes Res 5:125CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Li N, van Agthoven M, Willemse P, Uyl-de Groot C (2001) A cost–utility analysis comparing second-line chemotherapy schemes in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 12(6):533–540CrossRef Li N, van Agthoven M, Willemse P, Uyl-de Groot C (2001) A cost–utility analysis comparing second-line chemotherapy schemes in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 12(6):533–540CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lopes G, Gluck S, Avancha K, Montero AJ (2013) A cost effectiveness study of eribulin versus standard single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy for women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(1):187–193. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2326-8 CrossRefPubMed Lopes G, Gluck S, Avancha K, Montero AJ (2013) A cost effectiveness study of eribulin versus standard single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy for women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(1):187–193. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-012-2326-8 CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Machado M, Einarson TR (2012) Lapatinib in patients with metastatic breast cancer following initial treatment with trastuzumab: an economic analysis from the Brazilian public health care perspective. Breast Cancer 4:173PubMed Machado M, Einarson TR (2012) Lapatinib in patients with metastatic breast cancer following initial treatment with trastuzumab: an economic analysis from the Brazilian public health care perspective. Breast Cancer 4:173PubMed
46.
go back to reference Montero AJ, Avancha K, Gluck S, Lopes G (2012) A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(2):747–751. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1919-y CrossRefPubMed Montero AJ, Avancha K, Gluck S, Lopes G (2012) A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(2):747–751. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-011-1919-y CrossRefPubMed
47.
48.
50.
go back to reference Takeda AL, Jones J, Loveman E, Tan SC, Clegg AJ (2007) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 11(19):1–62CrossRef Takeda AL, Jones J, Loveman E, Tan SC, Clegg AJ (2007) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 11(19):1–62CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Verma S, Ilersich AL (2003) Population-based pharmacoeconomic model for adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 8(3):232–240CrossRef Verma S, Ilersich AL (2003) Population-based pharmacoeconomic model for adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 8(3):232–240CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Verma S, Maraninchi D, O’Shaughnessy J, Jamieson C, Jones S, Martin M et al (2005) Capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy. Cancer 103(12):2455–2465CrossRef Verma S, Maraninchi D, O’Shaughnessy J, Jamieson C, Jones S, Martin M et al (2005) Capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy. Cancer 103(12):2455–2465CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Athanasakis K, Kyriopoulos J (2012) A cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab plus docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the Greek healhcare setting. Forum of. Clin Oncol 2012(3):4 Athanasakis K, Kyriopoulos J (2012) A cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab plus docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the Greek healhcare setting. Forum of. Clin Oncol 2012(3):4
54.
Metadata
Title
Reviewing the quality, health benefit and value for money of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer
Authors
Xavier Ghislain Léon Victor Pouwels
Bram L. T. Ramaekers
Manuela A. Joore
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4374-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine