Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Review

Review of the Clinical and Economic Burden of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients

Authors: Gorden Muduma, Isaac Odeyemi, Jayne Smith-Palmer, Richard F. Pollock

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) is a leading cause of late graft loss in kidney transplant recipients, accounting for up to 60% of late graft failures. AbMR manifests as two distinct phenotypes: the first occurs in the immediate post-transplant period in sensitized patients; the second occurs in the late post-transplant period and has been associated with non-adherence to immunosuppression. The present review summarizes the current treatment options for AbMR, its clinical and economic burden, and approaches for reducing the risk of AbMR. While AbMR is typically refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, there are numerous other approaches focused on removal, inhibition or neutralization of donor-specific antibodies, or inhibition of complement-mediated allograft damage. AbMR treatment is generally expensive with one US study reporting costs of USD 49,000–155,000 per episode. However, leaving AbMR untreated puts patients at high risk of capillaritis, microangiopathy, necrosis and graft failure, which may ultimately result in much greater costs associated with a return to dialysis. Given the barriers to treatment, which include the high cost and the fact that pharmacologic treatments are currently used off-label, prevention of AbMR is important, with improvement in patient adherence to immunosuppression a key strategic approach that may be worthy of further evaluation.
Funding: Astellas Pharma EMEA Limited.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725–30.CrossRefPubMed Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725–30.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jofré R, López-Gómez JM, Moreno F, Sanz-Guajardo D, Valderrábano F. Changes in quality of life after renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(1):93–100.CrossRefPubMed Jofré R, López-Gómez JM, Moreno F, Sanz-Guajardo D, Valderrábano F. Changes in quality of life after renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(1):93–100.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sánchez-Escuredo A, Alsina A, Diekmann F, et al. Economic analysis of the treatment of end-stage renal disease treatment: living-donor kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis. Transpl Proc. 2015;47(1):30–3.CrossRef Sánchez-Escuredo A, Alsina A, Diekmann F, et al. Economic analysis of the treatment of end-stage renal disease treatment: living-donor kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis. Transpl Proc. 2015;47(1):30–3.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jensen CE, Sørensen P, Petersen KD. In Denmark kidney transplantation is more cost-effective than dialysis. Dan Med J. 2014;61(3):A4796.PubMed Jensen CE, Sørensen P, Petersen KD. In Denmark kidney transplantation is more cost-effective than dialysis. Dan Med J. 2014;61(3):A4796.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Sellarés J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, et al. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transpl. 2012;12(2):388–99.CrossRef Sellarés J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, et al. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transpl. 2012;12(2):388–99.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Halloran PF, de Freitas DG, Einecke G, et al. An integrated view of molecular changes, histopathology and outcomes in kidney transplants. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(10):2223–30.CrossRefPubMed Halloran PF, de Freitas DG, Einecke G, et al. An integrated view of molecular changes, histopathology and outcomes in kidney transplants. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(10):2223–30.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Einecke G, Sis B, Reeve J, et al. Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(11):2520–31.CrossRefPubMed Einecke G, Sis B, Reeve J, et al. Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(11):2520–31.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gaston RS, Cecka JM, Kasiske BL, et al. Evidence for antibody-mediated injury as a major determinant of late kidney allograft failure. Transplantation. 2010;90(1):68–74.CrossRefPubMed Gaston RS, Cecka JM, Kasiske BL, et al. Evidence for antibody-mediated injury as a major determinant of late kidney allograft failure. Transplantation. 2010;90(1):68–74.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Djamali A, Kaufman DB, Ellis TM, Zhong W, Matas A, Samaniego M. Diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection: current status and novel approaches. Am J Transpl. 2014;14(2):255–71.CrossRef Djamali A, Kaufman DB, Ellis TM, Zhong W, Matas A, Samaniego M. Diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection: current status and novel approaches. Am J Transpl. 2014;14(2):255–71.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mengel M, Sis B, Haas M, et al. Banff 2011 meeting report: new concepts in antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transpl. 2012;12(3):563–70.CrossRef Mengel M, Sis B, Haas M, et al. Banff 2011 meeting report: new concepts in antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transpl. 2012;12(3):563–70.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Haas M, Sis B, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions. Am J Transpl. 2014;14(2):272–83.CrossRef Haas M, Sis B, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions. Am J Transpl. 2014;14(2):272–83.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Takemoto SK, Zeevi A, Feng S, et al. National conference to assess antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transpl. 2004;4(7):1033–41.CrossRef Takemoto SK, Zeevi A, Feng S, et al. National conference to assess antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transpl. 2004;4(7):1033–41.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mauiyyedi S, Crespo M, Collins AB, et al. Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(3):779–87.PubMed Mauiyyedi S, Crespo M, Collins AB, et al. Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(3):779–87.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Puttarajappa C, Shapiro R, Tan HP. Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review. J Transpl. 2012;2012:193724. Puttarajappa C, Shapiro R, Tan HP. Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review. J Transpl. 2012;2012:193724.
17.
go back to reference Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Suppl 3. 2009;9:S1–157. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Suppl 3. 2009;9:S1–157.
19.
go back to reference Kristinsson SY, Gridley G, Hoover RN, Check D, Landgren O. Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free American veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up. Haematologica. 2014;99(2):392–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kristinsson SY, Gridley G, Hoover RN, Check D, Landgren O. Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free American veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up. Haematologica. 2014;99(2):392–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Hychko G, Mirhosseini A, Parhizgar A, Ghahramani N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rituximab in antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection. Int J Organ Transpl Med. 2011;2(2):51–6. Hychko G, Mirhosseini A, Parhizgar A, Ghahramani N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rituximab in antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection. Int J Organ Transpl Med. 2011;2(2):51–6.
21.
go back to reference Sautenet B, Blancho G, Büchler M, et al. One-year results of the effects of rituximab on acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation: RITUX ERAH, a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2015;. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000000958. Sautenet B, Blancho G, Büchler M, et al. One-year results of the effects of rituximab on acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation: RITUX ERAH, a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2015;. doi:10.​1097/​TP.​0000000000000958​.
22.
go back to reference Nigos JG, Arora S, Nath P, et al. Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience with a bortezomib-based regimen. Exp Clin Transpl. 2012;10(6):609–13.CrossRef Nigos JG, Arora S, Nath P, et al. Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience with a bortezomib-based regimen. Exp Clin Transpl. 2012;10(6):609–13.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tzvetanov I, Spaggiari M, Joseph J, et al. The use of bortezomib as a rescue treatment for acute antibody-mediated rejection: report of three cases and review of literature. Transpl Proc. 2012;44(10):2971–5.CrossRef Tzvetanov I, Spaggiari M, Joseph J, et al. The use of bortezomib as a rescue treatment for acute antibody-mediated rejection: report of three cases and review of literature. Transpl Proc. 2012;44(10):2971–5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sureshkumar KK, Hussain SM, Marcus RJ, et al. Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib: an effective therapy for severe antibody mediated rejection after renal transplantation. Clin Nephrol. 2012;77(3):246–53.CrossRefPubMed Sureshkumar KK, Hussain SM, Marcus RJ, et al. Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib: an effective therapy for severe antibody mediated rejection after renal transplantation. Clin Nephrol. 2012;77(3):246–53.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Flechner SM, Fatica R, Askar M, et al. The role of proteasome inhibition with bortezomib in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney-only or kidney-combined organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;90(12):1486–92.CrossRefPubMed Flechner SM, Fatica R, Askar M, et al. The role of proteasome inhibition with bortezomib in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney-only or kidney-combined organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;90(12):1486–92.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rother RP, Rollins SA, Mojcik CF, Brodsky RA, Bell L. Discovery and development of the complement inhibitor eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(11):1256–64.CrossRefPubMed Rother RP, Rollins SA, Mojcik CF, Brodsky RA, Bell L. Discovery and development of the complement inhibitor eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(11):1256–64.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Stegall MD, Diwan T, Raghavaiah S, et al. Terminal complement inhibition decreases antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized renal transplant recipients. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(11):2405–13.CrossRef Stegall MD, Diwan T, Raghavaiah S, et al. Terminal complement inhibition decreases antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized renal transplant recipients. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(11):2405–13.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference González-Roncero F, Suñer M, Bernal G, et al. Eculizumab treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation: case reports. Transpl Proc. 2012;44(9):2690–4.CrossRef González-Roncero F, Suñer M, Bernal G, et al. Eculizumab treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation: case reports. Transpl Proc. 2012;44(9):2690–4.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Roberts DM, Jiang SH, Chadban SJ. The treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients-a systematic review. Transplantation. 2012;94(8):775–83.CrossRefPubMed Roberts DM, Jiang SH, Chadban SJ. The treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients-a systematic review. Transplantation. 2012;94(8):775–83.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Burton SA, Amir N, Asbury A, Lange A, Hardinger KL. Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant patients: a clinical practice survey. Clin Transpl. 2015;29(2):118–23.CrossRef Burton SA, Amir N, Asbury A, Lange A, Hardinger KL. Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant patients: a clinical practice survey. Clin Transpl. 2015;29(2):118–23.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Archdeacon P, Chan M, Neuland C, et al. Summary of FDA antibody-mediated rejection workshop. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(5):896–906.CrossRef Archdeacon P, Chan M, Neuland C, et al. Summary of FDA antibody-mediated rejection workshop. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(5):896–906.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Irish W, Boscoe A, Ryan MP, Iloeje U, Gunnarsson C, Marks W. Economic burden of antibody mediated rejection following kidney transplantation: comparative analysis using the premier hospital database. Value Health. 2015;18(3):A187.CrossRef Irish W, Boscoe A, Ryan MP, Iloeje U, Gunnarsson C, Marks W. Economic burden of antibody mediated rejection following kidney transplantation: comparative analysis using the premier hospital database. Value Health. 2015;18(3):A187.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Vo AA, Petrozzino J, Yeung K, et al. Efficacy, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of desensitization using IVIG and rituximab. Transplantation. 2013;95(6):852–8.CrossRefPubMed Vo AA, Petrozzino J, Yeung K, et al. Efficacy, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of desensitization using IVIG and rituximab. Transplantation. 2013;95(6):852–8.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Marfo K, Lu A, Ling M, Akalin E. Desensitization protocols and their outcome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(4):922–36.CrossRefPubMed Marfo K, Lu A, Ling M, Akalin E. Desensitization protocols and their outcome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(4):922–36.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Tanriover B, Wright SE, Foster SV, et al. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a cost analysis. Transpl Proc. 2008;40(10):3393–6.CrossRef Tanriover B, Wright SE, Foster SV, et al. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a cost analysis. Transpl Proc. 2008;40(10):3393–6.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kim M, Martin ST, Townsend KR, Gabardi S. Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(7):733–44.CrossRefPubMed Kim M, Martin ST, Townsend KR, Gabardi S. Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(7):733–44.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Muduma G, Odeyemi I, Pollock RF. Evaluating the economic implications of non-adherence and antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients: the role of once-daily tacrolimus in the UK. J Med Econ. 2015;18(12):1050–9.CrossRefPubMed Muduma G, Odeyemi I, Pollock RF. Evaluating the economic implications of non-adherence and antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients: the role of once-daily tacrolimus in the UK. J Med Econ. 2015;18(12):1050–9.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Biesenbach P, Kain R, Derfler K, et al. Long-term outcome of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease treated with immunoadsorption. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103568.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Biesenbach P, Kain R, Derfler K, et al. Long-term outcome of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease treated with immunoadsorption. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103568.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Morath C, Beimler J, Opelz G, et al. Living donor kidney transplantation in crossmatch-positive patients enabled by peritransplant immunoadsorption and anti-CD20 therapy. Transpl Int. 2012;25(5):506–17.CrossRefPubMed Morath C, Beimler J, Opelz G, et al. Living donor kidney transplantation in crossmatch-positive patients enabled by peritransplant immunoadsorption and anti-CD20 therapy. Transpl Int. 2012;25(5):506–17.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Gubensek J, Buturovic-Ponikvar J, Kandus A, et al. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a single-center historic cohort study. Transpl Proc. 2013;45(4):1524–7.CrossRef Gubensek J, Buturovic-Ponikvar J, Kandus A, et al. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a single-center historic cohort study. Transpl Proc. 2013;45(4):1524–7.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Willicombe M, Roufosse C, Brookes P, et al. Antibody-mediated rejection after alemtuzumab induction: incidence, risk factors, and predictors of poor outcome. Transplantation. 2011;92(2):176–82.CrossRefPubMed Willicombe M, Roufosse C, Brookes P, et al. Antibody-mediated rejection after alemtuzumab induction: incidence, risk factors, and predictors of poor outcome. Transplantation. 2011;92(2):176–82.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Schwartzberg LS, Stepanski EJ, Fortner BV, Houts AC. Retrospective chart review of severe infusion reactions with rituximab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab in community oncology practices: assessment of clinical consequences. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(4):393–8.CrossRefPubMed Schwartzberg LS, Stepanski EJ, Fortner BV, Houts AC. Retrospective chart review of severe infusion reactions with rituximab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab in community oncology practices: assessment of clinical consequences. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(4):393–8.CrossRefPubMed
48.
49.
go back to reference Cornell LD, Schinstock CA, Gandhi MJ, Kremers WK, Stegall MD. Positive crossmatch kidney transplant recipients treated with eculizumab: outcomes beyond 1 year. Am J Transplant. 2015. doi:10.1111/ajt.13168. [Epub ahead of print]. Cornell LD, Schinstock CA, Gandhi MJ, Kremers WK, Stegall MD. Positive crossmatch kidney transplant recipients treated with eculizumab: outcomes beyond 1 year. Am J Transplant. 2015. doi:10.​1111/​ajt.​13168. [Epub ahead of print].
50.
go back to reference Tait BD, Süsal C, Gebel HM, et al. Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;95(1):19–47.CrossRefPubMed Tait BD, Süsal C, Gebel HM, et al. Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;95(1):19–47.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Dharancy S, Giral M, Tetaz R, Fatras M, Dubel L, Pageaux GP. Adherence with immunosuppressive treatment after transplantation: results from the French trial PREDICT. Clin Transpl. 2012;26(3):E293–9.CrossRef Dharancy S, Giral M, Tetaz R, Fatras M, Dubel L, Pageaux GP. Adherence with immunosuppressive treatment after transplantation: results from the French trial PREDICT. Clin Transpl. 2012;26(3):E293–9.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Weng FL, Israni AK, Joffe MM, et al. Race and electronically measured adherence to immunosuppressive medications after deceased donor renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(6):1839–48.CrossRefPubMed Weng FL, Israni AK, Joffe MM, et al. Race and electronically measured adherence to immunosuppressive medications after deceased donor renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(6):1839–48.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Morales JM, Varo E, Lázaro P. Immunosuppressant treatment adherence, barriers to adherence and quality of life in renal and liver transplant recipients in Spain. Clin Transpl. 2012;26(2):369–76.CrossRef Morales JM, Varo E, Lázaro P. Immunosuppressant treatment adherence, barriers to adherence and quality of life in renal and liver transplant recipients in Spain. Clin Transpl. 2012;26(2):369–76.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Ichimaru N, Kakuta Y, Abe T, et al. Treatment adherence in renal transplant recipients: a questionnaire survey on immunosuppressants. Transpl Proc. 2008;40(5):1362–5.CrossRef Ichimaru N, Kakuta Y, Abe T, et al. Treatment adherence in renal transplant recipients: a questionnaire survey on immunosuppressants. Transpl Proc. 2008;40(5):1362–5.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Guirado L, Cantarell C, Franco A, et al. Efficacy and safety of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in a large cohort of stable kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(9):1965–71.CrossRef Guirado L, Cantarell C, Franco A, et al. Efficacy and safety of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in a large cohort of stable kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(9):1965–71.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Kuypers DR, Peeters PC, Sennesael JJ, et al. Improved adherence to tacrolimus once-daily formulation in renal recipients: a randomized controlled trial using electronic monitoring. Transplantation. 2013;95(2):333–40.CrossRefPubMed Kuypers DR, Peeters PC, Sennesael JJ, et al. Improved adherence to tacrolimus once-daily formulation in renal recipients: a randomized controlled trial using electronic monitoring. Transplantation. 2013;95(2):333–40.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Mohty M. Mechanisms of action of antithymocyte globulin: T-cell depletion and beyond. Leukemia. 2007;21(7):1387–94.CrossRefPubMed Mohty M. Mechanisms of action of antithymocyte globulin: T-cell depletion and beyond. Leukemia. 2007;21(7):1387–94.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Shah A, Nadasdy T, Arend L, et al. Treatment of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection with plasmapheresis and rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulin. Transplantation. 2004;77(9):1399–405.CrossRefPubMed Shah A, Nadasdy T, Arend L, et al. Treatment of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection with plasmapheresis and rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulin. Transplantation. 2004;77(9):1399–405.CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Kaposztas Z, Podder H, Mauiyyedi S, et al. Impact of rituximab therapy for treatment of acute humoral rejection. Clin Transpl. 2009;23(1):63–73.CrossRef Kaposztas Z, Podder H, Mauiyyedi S, et al. Impact of rituximab therapy for treatment of acute humoral rejection. Clin Transpl. 2009;23(1):63–73.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Everly MJ, Everly JJ, Susskind B, et al. Bortezomib provides effective therapy for antibody- and cell-mediated acute rejection. Transplantation. 2008;86(12):1754–61.CrossRefPubMed Everly MJ, Everly JJ, Susskind B, et al. Bortezomib provides effective therapy for antibody- and cell-mediated acute rejection. Transplantation. 2008;86(12):1754–61.CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Biglarnia AR, Nilsson B, Nilsson T, et al. Prompt reversal of a severe complement activation by eculizumab in a patient undergoing intentional ABO-incompatible pancreas and kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2011;24(8):e61–6.CrossRefPubMed Biglarnia AR, Nilsson B, Nilsson T, et al. Prompt reversal of a severe complement activation by eculizumab in a patient undergoing intentional ABO-incompatible pancreas and kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2011;24(8):e61–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Review of the Clinical and Economic Burden of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients
Authors
Gorden Muduma
Isaac Odeyemi
Jayne Smith-Palmer
Richard F. Pollock
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0292-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Advances in Therapy 3/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.