Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Gambling Studies
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies 2/2014

Open Access 01-06-2014 | Review Paper

Review of Self-exclusion from Gambling Venues as an Intervention for Problem Gambling

Author: Sally M. Gainsbury

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Self-exclusion programs are required to be provided by gambling operators in many international jurisdictions in an attempt to provide an option for those who have gambling problems to avoid further gambling. However, minimal robust and comprehensive research has been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of self-exclusion programs. There is much scope for reform and greater cohesion between jurisdictions, particularly neighbouring jurisdictions that would offer greater protection to individuals and industry bodies. This review outlines the evidence surrounding existing self-exclusion strategies, the benefits and limitations of such programs, and provides potential recommendations for an effective intervention program. Research suggests that self-exclusion programs are under-utilised by problem gamblers and are not completely effective in preventing individuals from gambling in venues from which they have excluded, or on other forms. Nonetheless, self-report indicates that self-excluders generally experience benefits from programs, including decreased gambling and increased psychological wellbeing and overall functioning. There are many areas in which existing programs could be improved, such as providing more resources for excluded individuals and reducing barriers to program entry, and more research is needed. However, self-exclusion programs are an important component of any public health strategy that aims to minimise gambling-related harms and these should be based as far as possible on empirical evidence for effective program components.
Footnotes
1
Electronic gaming machines (EGMs) include machines used across various jurisdictions including video lottery terminals (VLTs), poker machines (pokies), fruit machines, and slot machines.
 
Literature
Abbott, J., Francis, K., Dowling, N., & Coull, D. (2011, Nov). Motivators and barriers to joining a self-exclusion program. NAGS 21st annual international conference, Crown Conference Centre, Melbourne.
Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, L. (2007). Self-exclusion: A proposed gateway to treatment model. International Gambling Studies, 7, 59–71.CrossRef
Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.PubMedCrossRef
Croucher, R., & Croucher, J. S. (2006). Excluding the self-excluded: ‘Reasonable force’ and the problem gambler in Australia. In M. Adams, D. Barker, & S. McGolrick (Eds.), Australasian Law Teachers Association 2006 refereed conference papers. Lindfield: ALTA Secretariat.
Croucher, J. S., Croucher, R. F., & Leslie, J. R. (2006). Report of the Pilot Study on the Self-Exclusion Program conducted by GameChange (NSW).
Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Casey, D. M., el-Guebaly, N., Smith, G. J., Williams, R. J., et al. (2012). Examining the predictive validity of low risk gambling limits with longitudinal data. Addiction, 107, 400–406.PubMedCrossRef
Currie, S., Hodgins, D., Wang, J., el-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction, 101, 570–580.PubMedCrossRef
De Bruin, D. E., Benschop, A., Braam, R., & Korf, D. J. (2006). Meerspelers: Meerjarige monitor en follow-uponderzoek naar amusementscentra en bezoekers [diversive gambling: Multiple year monitor and follow-up survey into amusement arcades and visitors]. Utrecht/Amsterdam: CVO/Bonger Instituut.
De Bruin, D. E., Leenders, F. R. J., Fris, M., Verbraeck, H. T., Braam, R. V., & van de Wijngaart, G. F. (2001). Visitors of Holland Casino: Effectiveness of the policy for the prevention of problem gambling. CVO University of Utrecht, the Netherlands: Addictions Research Institute (unpublished English synopsis).
Fong, D., Fong, H. N., & Li, S. Z. (2011). The social cost of gambling in Macao: Before and after the liberalisation of the gaming industry. International Gambling Studies, 11, 43–56.CrossRef
Gainsbury, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011a). Online self-guided Interventions for the treatment of problem gambling international gambling studies, 11, 289–308.
Gainsbury, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011b). A systematic review of internet-based therapy for the treatment of addictions. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 490–498.PubMedCrossRef
Goudriaan, A. E., De Bruin, D., & Koeter, M. W. J. (2009). The Netherlands. In M. Griffiths, T. Hayer, & G. Meyer (Eds.), Problem gambling in Europe: Challenges, prevention and interventions (pp. 189–208). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Haefeli, J. (2005). Swiss experience with self-exclusion programs. Paper presented at Discovery 2005, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada.
Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2011a). Self-exclusion as a harm minimization strategy: Evidence from the casino sector from selected European countries. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 685–700.PubMedCrossRef
Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2011b). Internet self-exclusion: Characteristics of self-excluded gamblers and preliminary evidence for its effectiveness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9, 307–596.CrossRef
Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Brief communications: Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 453–460.PubMedCrossRef
Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 85–94.PubMedCrossRef
Lalande, D. R., & Ladouceur, R. (2011). Can cybernetics inspire gambling research? A limit-based conceptualization of self-control. International Gambling Studies, 11, 237–252.CrossRef
LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Stability and progression of disordered gambling: Lessons from longitudinal studies. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 53, 52–60.
Napolitano, F. (2003). The self-exclusion program: Legal and clinical considerations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 303–315.PubMedCrossRef
National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neill, M. (2004). Problem gambling and harm: Working towards a national definition. Melbourne: National Gambling Research Program Working Party.
Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrolment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 129–144.PubMedCrossRef
Nowatzki, R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: A review of the issues. International Gambling Studies, 2, 3–25.CrossRef
Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Characteristics and gender differences among self-excluded casino problem gamblers: Missouri data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 81–99.PubMedCrossRef
Nower, L. M., & Blaszczynski, A. P. (2008). Characteristics of problem gamblers 56 years of age or older: A statewide study of casino self-excluders. Psychology and Aging, 23, 577–584.PubMedCrossRef
O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopolous, V., O’Neil, D., et al. (2003). Part A—Evaluation of self-exclusion programs in Victoria and Part B—Summary of self-exclusion programs in Australian States and Territories. Melbourne: Gambling Research Panel.
Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66, 564–574.PubMedCrossRef
Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Report no. 50, Canberra.
Queensland Government. (2006). Queensland Household Gambling Survey 2003–04. Brisbane: Queensland Government.
Queensland Government. (2007). Queensland responsible gambling code of practice report on the cultural shift review. Brisbane: Queensland Government.
Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Discussion paper by the Responsible Gambling Council.
Schaffer, H. (2005). From disabling to enabling the public interest: Natural transitions from gambling exposure to adaptation and self-regulation—Commentary. Addiction, 100, 1227–1230.CrossRef
Schrans, T., Schellinck, T., & Grace, J. (2004). 2004 NS VL self exclusion program process test: Final report. Report submitted to the Nova Scotia Gaming Corporation.
South Australian Department of Health. (2006). Gambling prevalence in South Australia: October to December 2005. Prepared for SA Department for Families and Communities and the Independent Gambling Authority.
Svensson, J., & Romild, R. (2011). Incident Internet gambling in Sweden: Results from the Swedish longitudinal gambling study. International Gambling Studies, 11, 257–375.
Townshend, P. (2007). Self-exclusion in a public health environment: An effective treatment option in New Zealand. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 5, 390–395.CrossRef
Tremblay, N., Boutin, C., & Ladouceur, R. (2008). Improved Self-exclusion program: Preliminary results. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 505–518.PubMedCrossRef
Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. London: National Centre for Social Research.
Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2007). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2010). Internet gambling: prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
Metadata
Title
Review of Self-exclusion from Gambling Venues as an Intervention for Problem Gambling
Author
Sally M. Gainsbury
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 2/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9362-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of Gambling Studies 2/2014 Go to the issue

Review Paper

Risk Perception in Gambling: A Systematic Review

Original Paper

Prevalence of Gambling Problems Among the Clients of a Toronto Homeless Shelter

Original Paper

A Shorter and Multidimensional Version of the Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Survey (GABS-23)

Original Paper

An Overview of and Rationale for Changes Proposed for Pathological Gambling in DSM-5

Original Paper

Professional Help-Seeking for Gambling Problems: Awareness, Barriers and Motivators for Treatment

Original Paper

Citalopram-Associated Gambling: A Case Report