Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies 4/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Paper

Self-Exclusion as a Harm Minimization Strategy: Evidence for the Casino Sector from Selected European Countries

Authors: Tobias Hayer, Gerhard Meyer

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

As the international gambling market continues to expand, determining effective approaches to prevent gambling-related problems becomes increasingly important. Despite a lack of in-depth research into its benefits, self-exclusion is one such measure already in use around the world in various sectors of the gambling industry. The present study is the first of its kind to examine the effectiveness of self-exclusion schemes in the casino sector in selected European countries. A written survey yielded a sample of N = 152 (self)-excluded gamblers. In addition to this cross-section analysis, a small sub-group (n = 31) was monitored over time by means of follow-up surveys carried out 1, 6, and 12 month(s) after the exclusion agreement came into force. The results reveal that the self-excluded individuals are typically under a great deal of strain and show a relatively pronounced willingness to change. However, this largely reaches its peak at the time the decision to self-exclude is made. From a longitudinal perspective, various parameters indicate a clear improvement in psychosocial functioning; a favorable effect that also starts directly after the exclusion agreement was signed. Finally, considering theoretical and empirical findings, possibilities for optimizing (self-)exclusion schemes will be discussed.
Footnotes
1
Sphericity was verified with the Mauchly test. If the sphericity assumption was violated, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction was used.
 
2
It is important to keep in mind that the participants were recruited at the time they signed the exclusion agreement. Both, the rather unusual research conditions and the way of data collection may account for the relative large number of missing values with regard to certain items. Therefore, the corresponding denominators are given for all data.
 
Literature
go back to reference Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, L. (2007). Self-exclusion: A proposed gateway to treatment model. International Gambling Studies, 7, 59–71.CrossRef Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, L. (2007). Self-exclusion: A proposed gateway to treatment model. International Gambling Studies, 7, 59–71.CrossRef
go back to reference Collins, P., & Kelly, J. (2002). Problem gambling and self-exclusion: A report to the South African Responsible Gambling Trust. Gaming Law Review, 6, 517–531.CrossRef Collins, P., & Kelly, J. (2002). Problem gambling and self-exclusion: A report to the South African Responsible Gambling Trust. Gaming Law Review, 6, 517–531.CrossRef
go back to reference Griffiths, M. D., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2009). Social responsibility tools in online gambling: A survey of attitudes and behavior among internet gamblers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 413–421.CrossRef Griffiths, M. D., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2009). Social responsibility tools in online gambling: A survey of attitudes and behavior among internet gamblers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 413–421.CrossRef
go back to reference Häfeli, J. (2009). Switzerland. In G. Meyer, T. Hayer, & M. Griffiths (Eds.), Problem gambling in Europe: Challenges, prevention, and interventions (pp. 317–326). New York: Springer. Häfeli, J. (2009). Switzerland. In G. Meyer, T. Hayer, & M. Griffiths (Eds.), Problem gambling in Europe: Challenges, prevention, and interventions (pp. 317–326). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2010). Internet self-exclusion: Characteristics of self-excluded gamblers and preliminary evidence for its effectiveness. International Journal of Addiction and Mental Health. Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2010). Internet self-exclusion: Characteristics of self-excluded gamblers and preliminary evidence for its effectiveness. International Journal of Addiction and Mental Health.
go back to reference Jackson, A. C., & Thomas, S. A. (2005). Clients’ perspectives of, and experiences with, selected Australian problem gambling services. Journal of Gambling Issues, 14. Jackson, A. C., & Thomas, S. A. (2005). Clients’ perspectives of, and experiences with, selected Australian problem gambling services. Journal of Gambling Issues, 14.
go back to reference Künzi, K., Fritschi, T., Oesch, T., Gehrig, M., & Julien, N. (2009). Soziale Kosten des Glücksspiels in Casinos: Studie zur Erfassung der durch die Schweizer Casinos verursachten Kosten [Social costs of casino gambling: Study to determine the social costs of Swiss casinos]. Bern. Künzi, K., Fritschi, T., Oesch, T., Gehrig, M., & Julien, N. (2009). Soziale Kosten des Glücksspiels in Casinos: Studie zur Erfassung der durch die Schweizer Casinos verursachten Kosten [Social costs of casino gambling: Study to determine the social costs of Swiss casinos]. Bern.
go back to reference LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., LaPlante, D. A., Peller, A. J., Caro, G., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Missouri casino self-excluders: Distribution across time and space. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 231–243.PubMedCrossRef LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., LaPlante, D. A., Peller, A. J., Caro, G., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Missouri casino self-excluders: Distribution across time and space. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 231–243.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 453–460.PubMedCrossRef Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 453–460.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 85–94.PubMedCrossRef Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 85–94.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2007). Die Spielsperre des Glücksspielers – Eine Bestandsaufnahme [The exclusion of gamblers – The current situation]. Sucht, 53, 160–168.CrossRef Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2007). Die Spielsperre des Glücksspielers – Eine Bestandsaufnahme [The exclusion of gamblers – The current situation]. Sucht, 53, 160–168.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2010). Die Effektivität der Spielsperre als Maßnahme des Spielerschutzes – Eine empirische Untersuchung von gesperrten Spielern [The effectiveness of exclusion programs – An empirical study of banned gamblers]. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang. Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2010). Die Effektivität der Spielsperre als Maßnahme des Spielerschutzes – Eine empirische Untersuchung von gesperrten Spielern [The effectiveness of exclusion programs – An empirical study of banned gamblers]. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang.
go back to reference Meyer, G., Hayer, T., & Griffiths, M. (Eds.). (2009). Problem gambling in Europe: Challenges, prevention, and interventions. New York: Springer. Meyer, G., Hayer, T., & Griffiths, M. (Eds.). (2009). Problem gambling in Europe: Challenges, prevention, and interventions. New York: Springer.
go back to reference National Gambling Impact Study Commission. (1999). National Gambling Impact Study Commission: Final report. Washington, DC: National Gambling Impact Study Commission. National Gambling Impact Study Commission. (1999). National Gambling Impact Study Commission: Final report. Washington, DC: National Gambling Impact Study Commission.
go back to reference Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrollment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 129–144.PubMedCrossRef Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrollment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 129–144.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Characteristics and gender differences among self-excluded casino problem gamblers: Missouri data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 81–99.PubMedCrossRef Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Characteristics and gender differences among self-excluded casino problem gamblers: Missouri data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 81–99.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2008). Characteristics of problem gamblers 56 years of age or older: A statewide study of casino self-excluders. Psychology and Aging, 23, 577–584.PubMedCrossRef Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2008). Characteristics of problem gamblers 56 years of age or older: A statewide study of casino self-excluders. Psychology and Aging, 23, 577–584.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopoulos, V., O’Neil, D., et al. (2003). Report A—Evaluation of self-exclusion programs and harm minimisation measures and Report B—Summary of Australian States and Territories: Self-exclusion programs and harm minimisation policies/strategies. Adelaide. O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopoulos, V., O’Neil, D., et al. (2003). Report AEvaluation of self-exclusion programs and harm minimisation measures and Report BSummary of Australian States and Territories: Self-exclusion programs and harm minimisation policies/strategies. Adelaide.
go back to reference Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, Report no. 50. Canberra. Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, Report no. 50. Canberra.
go back to reference Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Toronto: A discussion paper by the Responsible Gambling Council. Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Toronto: A discussion paper by the Responsible Gambling Council.
go back to reference Schrans, T., Schellinck, T., & Grace, J. (2004). 2004 NS VL self exclusion program process test: Final report. Halifax, Nova Scotia (Canada): Focal Research. Schrans, T., Schellinck, T., & Grace, J. (2004). 2004 NS VL self exclusion program process test: Final report. Halifax, Nova Scotia (Canada): Focal Research.
go back to reference Slutske, W. S. (2006). Natural recovery and treatment-seeking in pathological gambling: Results of two US national surveys. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 297–302.PubMedCrossRef Slutske, W. S. (2006). Natural recovery and treatment-seeking in pathological gambling: Results of two US national surveys. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 297–302.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Steinberg, M. A. (2008). Ongoing evaluation of a self-exclusion program. Paper presented at the 22nd national conference on problem gambling, Long Beach, California (USA). Steinberg, M. A. (2008). Ongoing evaluation of a self-exclusion program. Paper presented at the 22nd national conference on problem gambling, Long Beach, California (USA).
go back to reference Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. R. (2005). DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling: Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. The American Journal on Addictions, 14, 73–82.PubMedCrossRef Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. R. (2005). DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling: Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. The American Journal on Addictions, 14, 73–82.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Suurvali, H., Cordingley, J., Hodgins, D. C., & Cunningham, J. (2009). Barriers to seeking help for gambling problems: A review of the literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 407–424.PubMedCrossRef Suurvali, H., Cordingley, J., Hodgins, D. C., & Cunningham, J. (2009). Barriers to seeking help for gambling problems: A review of the literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 407–424.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Townshend, P. (2007). Self-exclusion in a public health environment: An effective treatment option in New Zealand. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 390–395.CrossRef Townshend, P. (2007). Self-exclusion in a public health environment: An effective treatment option in New Zealand. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 390–395.CrossRef
go back to reference Tremblay, N., Boutin, C., & Ladouceur, R. (2008). Improved self-exclusion program: Preliminary results. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 505–518.PubMedCrossRef Tremblay, N., Boutin, C., & Ladouceur, R. (2008). Improved self-exclusion program: Preliminary results. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 505–518.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Xuan, Z., & Shaffer, H. (2009). How do gamblers end gambling: Longitudinal analysis of internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling-related problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 239–252.PubMedCrossRef Xuan, Z., & Shaffer, H. (2009). How do gamblers end gambling: Longitudinal analysis of internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling-related problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 239–252.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Self-Exclusion as a Harm Minimization Strategy: Evidence for the Casino Sector from Selected European Countries
Authors
Tobias Hayer
Gerhard Meyer
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 4/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9227-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Journal of Gambling Studies 4/2011 Go to the issue