Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Review

Review of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery

Authors: Fred Brody, Nathan G. Richards

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

In 2000, the robotic platform was introduced to surgeons to take advantage of the instrument’s three-dimensional visualization and articulating wrists. Today, robotic surgery is utilized across a broad array of applications. As the number and types of robotic procedures have increased, the degree of scrutiny has increased simultaneously regarding the role of robotics in the operating room. Even mainstream media articles have focused on the widespread adoption of the robotic platform. At the present time, many reports in the scientific literature document clinical outcomes utilizing robotic techniques relative to open procedures. These reports focus predominantly on the safety and feasibility of the robotic platform. However, only a limited number of reports have compared clinical outcomes of surgeries performed with robotic technologies versus conventional laparoscopy. This review provides a summary of the recent literature comparing the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery across an array of abdominal surgical procedures. This article also addresses the timely issues of cost, outcomes, and overall utility of the robotic platform within these disciplines. Where there is no robust comparative cost data available, it is necessarily omitted. Otherwise, relevant cost data have been included within each section. …
Literature
6.
go back to reference Jin LX, Ibrahim AM, Newman NA, Makarov DV, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA (2011) Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites. J Healthc Qual 33:48–52PubMedCrossRef Jin LX, Ibrahim AM, Newman NA, Makarov DV, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA (2011) Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites. J Healthc Qual 33:48–52PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Herzog TJ, Wright JD (2012) The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(174):171–177 Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Herzog TJ, Wright JD (2012) The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(174):171–177
8.
go back to reference Mirkin JN, Lowrance WT, Feifer AH, Mulhall JP, Eastham JE, Elkin EB (2012) Direct-to-consumer internet promotion of robotic prostatectomy exhibits varying quality of information. Health Aff 31:760–769CrossRef Mirkin JN, Lowrance WT, Feifer AH, Mulhall JP, Eastham JE, Elkin EB (2012) Direct-to-consumer internet promotion of robotic prostatectomy exhibits varying quality of information. Health Aff 31:760–769CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013PubMedCrossRef Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schar G (2012) Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 120:604–611PubMedCrossRef Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schar G (2012) Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 120:604–611PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J (2012) Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2:CD008978 Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J (2012) Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2:CD008978
13.
go back to reference Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309:689–698PubMedCrossRef Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309:689–698PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weissman JS, Zinner M (2013) Comparative effectiveness research on robotic surgery. JAMA 309:721–722PubMedCrossRef Weissman JS, Zinner M (2013) Comparative effectiveness research on robotic surgery. JAMA 309:721–722PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G (2012) Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS 16:542–548PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G (2012) Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS 16:542–548PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI (2012) Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS 16:519–524PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI (2012) Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS 16:519–524PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, Goldman N, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:783–791PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, Goldman N, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:783–791PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, Chernick M, Dunton CJ (2010) Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:500–503PubMedCrossRef Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, Chernick M, Dunton CJ (2010) Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:500–503PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C (2010) Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:730–738PubMedCrossRef Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C (2010) Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:730–738PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference AAGL (2013) AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:2–9CrossRef AAGL (2013) AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:2–9CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Breeden JT (2013) Statement on robotic surgery by ACOG President James T. Breeden, MD. ACOG website Breeden JT (2013) Statement on robotic surgery by ACOG President James T. Breeden, MD. ACOG website
22.
go back to reference Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, Burke WM, Frumovitz MM, Gardner GJ, Havrilesky LJ, Holloway R, Lowe MP, Magrina JF, Moore DH, Soliman PT, Yap S (2012) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a society of gynecologic oncology consensus statement. Developed by the society of gynecologic oncology’s clinical practice robotics task force. Gynecol Oncol 124:180–184PubMedCrossRef Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, Burke WM, Frumovitz MM, Gardner GJ, Havrilesky LJ, Holloway R, Lowe MP, Magrina JF, Moore DH, Soliman PT, Yap S (2012) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a society of gynecologic oncology consensus statement. Developed by the society of gynecologic oncology’s clinical practice robotics task force. Gynecol Oncol 124:180–184PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wilson EB (2009) The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 98:125–129PubMed Wilson EB (2009) The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 98:125–129PubMed
24.
go back to reference Moran PS, O’Neill M, Teljeur C, Flattery M, Murphy LA, Smith G, Ryan M (2013) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol 20:312–321PubMedCrossRef Moran PS, O’Neill M, Teljeur C, Flattery M, Murphy LA, Smith G, Ryan M (2013) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol 20:312–321PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, Pasqualetti P, Calado AA, Mugnier C (2011) Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 8:1503–1512PubMedCrossRef Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, Pasqualetti P, Calado AA, Mugnier C (2011) Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 8:1503–1512PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R (2009) Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 73:119–123PubMedCrossRef Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R (2009) Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 73:119–123PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Gomella LG, Lallas CD (2010) Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution. Urol Oncol 28:81–85PubMedCrossRef Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Gomella LG, Lallas CD (2010) Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution. Urol Oncol 28:81–85PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA (2012) The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 215:107–114 discussion 114–116PubMedCrossRef Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA (2012) The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 215:107–114 discussion 114–116PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Masson-Lecomte A, Bensalah K, Seringe E, Vaessen C, de la Taille A, Doumerc N, Rischmann P, Bruyere F, Soustelle L, Droupy S, Roupret M (2013) A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collaborative study. BJU Int 111:256–263PubMedCrossRef Masson-Lecomte A, Bensalah K, Seringe E, Vaessen C, de la Taille A, Doumerc N, Rischmann P, Bruyere F, Soustelle L, Droupy S, Roupret M (2013) A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collaborative study. BJU Int 111:256–263PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, Lotan Y (2011) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 25:447–453PubMedCrossRef Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, Lotan Y (2011) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 25:447–453PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, Haber GP, Chlosta PL, Somani BK, Kaouk JH (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 62:1023–1033PubMedCrossRef Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, Haber GP, Chlosta PL, Somani BK, Kaouk JH (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 62:1023–1033PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC (2012) Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 187:1392–1398PubMedCrossRef Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC (2012) Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 187:1392–1398PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Alemozaffar M, Chang SL, Kacker R, Sun M, Dewolf WC, Wagner AA (2013) Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 27(5):560–565PubMedCrossRef Alemozaffar M, Chang SL, Kacker R, Sun M, Dewolf WC, Wagner AA (2013) Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 27(5):560–565PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Panumatrassamee K, Autorino R, Laydner H, Hillyer S, Khalifeh A, Kassab A, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis. Int J Urol 20:484–491PubMedCrossRef Panumatrassamee K, Autorino R, Laydner H, Hillyer S, Khalifeh A, Kassab A, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis. Int J Urol 20:484–491PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Gregori A, Galli S, Goumas I, Scieri F, Stener S, Gaboardi F (2007) A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Italiano Urol Androl 79:127–129 Gregori A, Galli S, Goumas I, Scieri F, Stener S, Gaboardi F (2007) A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Italiano Urol Androl 79:127–129
36.
go back to reference Zehnder P, Gill IS (2011) Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol 21:415–419PubMedCrossRef Zehnder P, Gill IS (2011) Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol 21:415–419PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Rimington P, Coker B, Murphy D, Grieve A, Dasgupta P (2012) A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Prac 66:656–662CrossRef Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Rimington P, Coker B, Murphy D, Grieve A, Dasgupta P (2012) A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Prac 66:656–662CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH, Merola S, Weber P, Wasielewski A (2001) Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 7:405–412 Ballantyne GH, Merola S, Weber P, Wasielewski A (2001) Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 7:405–412
40.
go back to reference Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487PubMedCrossRef Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894PubMedCrossRef Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156PubMedCrossRef Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14:134–156CrossRef Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14:134–156CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466PubMedCrossRef Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708PubMedCrossRef Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS, Alasari S, Kim G, Hur H, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1379–1385PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS, Alasari S, Kim G, Hur H, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1379–1385PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the united states: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 1–9 Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the united states: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 1–9
49.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2012) Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 9:CD006578 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2012) Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 9:CD006578
50.
go back to reference Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, Bao SY, Liu JL, Zhang Y, Ren YG (2006) Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobil Pancreatic Dis Int HBPD INT 5:115–118 Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, Bao SY, Liu JL, Zhang Y, Ren YG (2006) Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobil Pancreatic Dis Int HBPD INT 5:115–118
51.
go back to reference Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262PubMedCrossRef Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Gozalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531 Aug 2013CrossRef Gozalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531 Aug 2013CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Buzad FA, Corne LM, Brown TC, Fagin RS, Hebert AE, Kacmarek CA, Pack AN, Payne TN (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(3):365–370PubMedCrossRef Buzad FA, Corne LM, Brown TC, Fagin RS, Hebert AE, Kacmarek CA, Pack AN, Payne TN (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(3):365–370PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Vidovsky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR (2013) Single-Site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg October 28, 2013. Epub ahead of print Vidovsky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR (2013) Single-Site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg October 28, 2013. Epub ahead of print
55.
go back to reference Romero-Talamis H, Kroh M (2013) Cholecystectomy by using a surgical robot system. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. September 20, 2013. Epub ahead of print Romero-Talamis H, Kroh M (2013) Cholecystectomy by using a surgical robot system. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. September 20, 2013. Epub ahead of print
56.
go back to reference Ross SB, Sawangkum P, De La Vega KA, Teta A, Luberice K, Rosemurgy AS (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): an initial review of safety and feasibility. Miner Chirurg 68(5):435–443 Ross SB, Sawangkum P, De La Vega KA, Teta A, Luberice K, Rosemurgy AS (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): an initial review of safety and feasibility. Miner Chirurg 68(5):435–443
57.
go back to reference Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Publiese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 14(8):709–714 Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Publiese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 14(8):709–714
58.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ (2010) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 6:125–131PubMed Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ (2010) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 6:125–131PubMed
59.
go back to reference Mi J, Kang Y, Chen X, Wang B, Wang Z (2010) Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1803–1814PubMedCrossRef Mi J, Kang Y, Chen X, Wang B, Wang Z (2010) Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1803–1814PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Wang Z, Zheng Q, Jin Z (2012) Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. ANZ J Surg 82:112–117PubMedCrossRef Wang Z, Zheng Q, Jin Z (2012) Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. ANZ J Surg 82:112–117PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ (2005) Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Rel Dis 1:549–554CrossRef Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ (2005) Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Rel Dis 1:549–554CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, Kinross J, Ziprin P (2011) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot 7:393–400PubMedCrossRef Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, Kinross J, Ziprin P (2011) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot 7:393–400PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M (2011) Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 25:597–603PubMedCrossRef Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M (2011) Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 25:597–603PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P, Morel P (2012) Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 22:52–61PubMedCrossRef Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P, Morel P (2012) Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 22:52–61PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Edelson PK, Dumon KR, Sonnad SS, Shafi BM, Williams NN (2011) Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases. Surg Endosc 25:1402–1408PubMedCrossRef Edelson PK, Dumon KR, Sonnad SS, Shafi BM, Williams NN (2011) Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases. Surg Endosc 25:1402–1408PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Ayloo S, Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy for super-morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:295–299PubMedCrossRef Ayloo S, Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy for super-morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:295–299PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2288–2294PubMedCrossRef Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2288–2294PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 151:537–542PubMedCrossRef Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 151:537–542PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Arch Surg 147:272–275PubMedCrossRef Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Arch Surg 147:272–275PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Brunaud L, Germain A, Zarnegar R, Cuny T, Ayav A, Bresler L (2011) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:248–254PubMedCrossRef Brunaud L, Germain A, Zarnegar R, Cuny T, Ayav A, Bresler L (2011) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:248–254PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Gelmini R, Franzoni C, Spaziani A, Patriti A, Casciola L, Saviano M (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy: conventional versus robotic approach—a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:393–398PubMedCrossRef Gelmini R, Franzoni C, Spaziani A, Patriti A, Casciola L, Saviano M (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy: conventional versus robotic approach—a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:393–398PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Tudor S (2012) Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach. Surg Endosc 26:2802–2809PubMedCrossRef Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Tudor S (2012) Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach. Surg Endosc 26:2802–2809PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 25:2004–2009PubMedCrossRef Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 25:2004–2009PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Ball CG, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148:814–823PubMedCrossRef Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Ball CG, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148:814–823PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128–132PubMedCrossRef Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128–132PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, Leung DH, Klimstra D, Conlon KC (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137:164–168PubMedCrossRef Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, Leung DH, Klimstra D, Conlon KC (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137:164–168PubMedCrossRef
77.
78.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 215:810–819PubMedCrossRef Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 215:810–819PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo S, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo S, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746PubMedCrossRef
81.
Metadata
Title
Review of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery
Authors
Fred Brody
Nathan G. Richards
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3342-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2014 Go to the issue