Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Editorial

Retropubic versus transobturator MUS: time to revisit?

Authors: Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Synthetic midurethral sling (MUS) operations have become the current standard for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. The retropubic tension-free vaginal tape was introduced by Ulmsten et al. in 1996 [1], while the transobturator technique was introduced by Delorme in 2001 [2]. Thus, we have 20 and 15 years of accumulated evidence regarding these techniques, respectively. According to the latest Cochrane systematic review [3], the retropubic and transobturator procedures are associated with similar cure rates, both subjective and objective in the short term (≤1 year), the medium term (1–5 years), and even in the long term (>5 years). The relative risks vary between 1 and 0.95. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81–5.CrossRefPubMed Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol. 2001;11(6):1306–13.PubMed Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol. 2001;11(6):1306–13.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD006375. Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD006375.
4.
go back to reference Foss Hansen M, Lose G, Kesmodel US, Gradel KO. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(2):263.e1–e8.CrossRef Foss Hansen M, Lose G, Kesmodel US, Gradel KO. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(2):263.e1–e8.CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Ford AA, Ogah JA. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):19–28.CrossRefPubMed Ford AA, Ogah JA. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):19–28.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Schäfer W. Some biomechanical aspects of continence function. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2001;207:44–60.CrossRef Schäfer W. Some biomechanical aspects of continence function. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2001;207:44–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tomoe H. Value of maximum urethral closure pressure in predicting the outcome of tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedure. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2013;5(2):65–8.CrossRefPubMed Tomoe H. Value of maximum urethral closure pressure in predicting the outcome of tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedure. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2013;5(2):65–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lose G, Ostergard DR. Medical technology assessment and surgery for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(6):351–2.CrossRefPubMed Lose G, Ostergard DR. Medical technology assessment and surgery for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(6):351–2.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Blaivas JG, Purohit RS, Benedon MS, et al. Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12(9):481–509.CrossRefPubMed Blaivas JG, Purohit RS, Benedon MS, et al. Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12(9):481–509.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Retropubic versus transobturator MUS: time to revisit?
Authors
Gunnar Lose
Niels Klarskov
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3403-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 8/2017 Go to the issue