Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Article

Effect of mesh width on apical support after sacrocolpopexy

Authors: Sunil Balgobin, Joseph L. Fitzwater, Donald D. McIntire, Imelda J. Delgado, Clifford Y. Wai

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We evaluated the effect of polypropylene mesh width on vaginal apical support, mesh elongation, and mesh tensile strength for abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Methods

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy was performed on ten cadavers using pieces of polypropylene mesh of width 1, 2, and 3 cm. Weights of 1, 2, 3, and 4 kg were sequentially applied to the vagina. The total distance moved by the vaginal apex, and the amount of stretch of the intervening mesh segment between the sacrum and the vagina were recorded for each width. The failure strengths of additional single and double layer sets of each width were also tested using a tensiometer. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance using a random effects model.

Results

The mean (standard error of the mean) maximum distance moved by the vaginal apex was 4.63 cm (0.37 cm) for the 1 cm mesh compared to 3.67 cm (0.26 cm) and 2.73 cm (0.14 cm) for the 2 and 3 cm meshes, respectively (P < 0.0001). The 1 cm width ruptured during testing in four of the ten cadavers. The results were similar for mesh elongation, with the 1 cm mesh stretching the most and the 3 cm mesh stretching the least. Mesh failure loads for double-layer mesh were 52.9 N (2.5 N), 124.4 N (2.7 N), and 201.2 N (4.5 N) for the 1, 2, and 3 cm meshes, respectively, and were higher than the failure loads for single mesh (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In a cadaver model, increasing mesh width is associated with better vaginal apical support, less mesh elongation, and higher failure loads. Mesh widths of 2–3 cm provide sufficient repair strength for sacrocolpopexy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(4), CD004014. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(4), CD004014.
2.
go back to reference Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309:2016–2024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309:2016–2024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–823.CrossRefPubMed Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–823.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference O’Sullivan OE, Matthews CA, O’Reilly BA. Sacrocolpopexy: is there a consistent surgical technique? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:747–750.CrossRefPubMed O’Sullivan OE, Matthews CA, O’Reilly BA. Sacrocolpopexy: is there a consistent surgical technique? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:747–750.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L. The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;8:105–115.CrossRef Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L. The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;8:105–115.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ulrich D, Edwards SL, Alexander DLJ, Rosamilia A, Werkmeister JA, Gargett CE, et al. Changes in pelvic organ prolapse mesh mechanical properties following implantation in rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:260.e1–260.e8.CrossRef Ulrich D, Edwards SL, Alexander DLJ, Rosamilia A, Werkmeister JA, Gargett CE, et al. Changes in pelvic organ prolapse mesh mechanical properties following implantation in rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:260.e1–260.e8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jones KA, Feola A, Meyn L, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Tensile properties of commonly used prolapse meshes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:847–853.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones KA, Feola A, Meyn L, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Tensile properties of commonly used prolapse meshes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:847–853.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Shepherd JP, Feola A, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Uniaxial biomechanical properties of seven different vaginal implanted meshes for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:613–620.CrossRefPubMed Shepherd JP, Feola A, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Uniaxial biomechanical properties of seven different vaginal implanted meshes for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:613–620.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Culligan PJ, Salamon C, Priestley JL, Shariati A. Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:143–151.CrossRefPubMed Culligan PJ, Salamon C, Priestley JL, Shariati A. Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:143–151.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Medina CA, Pietro PA, Whitted RW, Penalver M. The use of dura mater allografts for abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Pelvic Surg. 2002;8:247–251. Medina CA, Pietro PA, Whitted RW, Penalver M. The use of dura mater allografts for abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Pelvic Surg. 2002;8:247–251.
12.
go back to reference Timmons MC, Addison WA, Addison SB, Cavenar MG. Abdominal sacral colpopexy in 163 women with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele: evolution of operative techniques. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:323–327.PubMed Timmons MC, Addison WA, Addison SB, Cavenar MG. Abdominal sacral colpopexy in 163 women with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele: evolution of operative techniques. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:323–327.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Deprest J, Zheng F, Konstantinovic M, Spelzini F, Claerhout F, Steensma A, et al. The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:S16–S25.CrossRefPubMed Deprest J, Zheng F, Konstantinovic M, Spelzini F, Claerhout F, Steensma A, et al. The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:S16–S25.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference White AB, Karrick KS, Corton MM, McIntire DD, Word RA, Rahn DD, et al. Optimal location and orientation of suture placement in abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1098–1103.CrossRefPubMed White AB, Karrick KS, Corton MM, McIntire DD, Word RA, Rahn DD, et al. Optimal location and orientation of suture placement in abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1098–1103.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rahn DD, Stone RJ, Vu AK, White AB, Wai CY. Abdominal hysterectomy with or without angle stitch: correlation with subsequent vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:669.e1–669.e4.CrossRef Rahn DD, Stone RJ, Vu AK, White AB, Wai CY. Abdominal hysterectomy with or without angle stitch: correlation with subsequent vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:669.e1–669.e4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rodeheaver GT, Thacker JG, Owen J, Strauss M, Masterson T, Edlich RF. Knotting and handling characteristics of coated synthetic absorbable sutures. J Surg Res. 1983;35:525–530.CrossRefPubMed Rodeheaver GT, Thacker JG, Owen J, Strauss M, Masterson T, Edlich RF. Knotting and handling characteristics of coated synthetic absorbable sutures. J Surg Res. 1983;35:525–530.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rempen A, Kraus M. Measurement of head compression during labor: preliminary results. J Perinat Med. 1991;19:115–120.CrossRefPubMed Rempen A, Kraus M. Measurement of head compression during labor: preliminary results. J Perinat Med. 1991;19:115–120.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Woodruff AJ, Roth CC, Winters JC. Abdominal sacral colpopexy: surgical pearls and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep. 2007;8:399–404.CrossRefPubMed Woodruff AJ, Roth CC, Winters JC. Abdominal sacral colpopexy: surgical pearls and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep. 2007;8:399–404.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Brizzolara S, Pillai-Allen A. Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:306–310.PubMedPubMedCentral Brizzolara S, Pillai-Allen A. Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:306–310.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Iosof CS. Abdominal sacral colpopexy with use of synthetic mesh. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72:214–217.CrossRef Iosof CS. Abdominal sacral colpopexy with use of synthetic mesh. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72:214–217.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Good MM, Abele TA, Balgobin S, Montoya TI, McIntire DD, Corton MM. Vascular and ureteral anatomy relative to the midsacral promontory. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:486.e1–486.e7.CrossRef Good MM, Abele TA, Balgobin S, Montoya TI, McIntire DD, Corton MM. Vascular and ureteral anatomy relative to the midsacral promontory. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:486.e1–486.e7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pilsgaard K, Mouritsen L. Follow up after repair of vaginal vault prolapse with abdominal colposacropexy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:66–70.CrossRefPubMed Pilsgaard K, Mouritsen L. Follow up after repair of vaginal vault prolapse with abdominal colposacropexy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:66–70.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Salamon CG, Lewis C, Priestley J, Gurshumov E, Culligan PJ. Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1371–1375.CrossRefPubMed Salamon CG, Lewis C, Priestley J, Gurshumov E, Culligan PJ. Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1371–1375.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Schofield ML, Higgs P, Hawnaur JM. MRI findings following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:333–339.CrossRefPubMed Schofield ML, Higgs P, Hawnaur JM. MRI findings following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:333–339.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of mesh width on apical support after sacrocolpopexy
Authors
Sunil Balgobin
Joseph L. Fitzwater
Donald D. McIntire
Imelda J. Delgado
Clifford Y. Wai
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3250-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 8/2017 Go to the issue