Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 7/2007

01-07-2007 | Letter

Response to comment on: Nauck MA, Duran S, Kim D et al (2007) A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study. Diabetologia 50:259–267

Authors: M. A. Nauck, M. Trautman, R. Brodows, D. Johns, J. Northrup, D. Kim

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 7/2007

Login to get access

Excerpt

To the Editor: In his letter to Diabetologia [1], P. D. Home highlights the difficulties of achieving optimal glycaemic control with insulins. While good glycaemic control was achieved with insulin (endpoint HbA1c about 7.0% on average) in the several recently published trials identified by Home [1], other trials have reported less than optimal results, particularly for insulin mixtures [2, 3]. Subjects in the treat-to-target trial conducted by Janka et al. [3] achieved a mean endpoint HbA1c of 7.49% with human NPH insulin 70/30. Subjects treated with biphasic insulin aspart 30 in the study conducted by Boehm et al. [2] achieved a mean HbA1c of 8.15% at endpoint. Incidentally, this study [2] was used as a reference when designing our non-inferiority study [4]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Home PD (2007) Comment on: Nauck MA, Duran S, Kim D et al (2007) A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study. Diabetologia 50:259–267 DOI 10.1007/s00125-007-0653-9 Home PD (2007) Comment on: Nauck MA, Duran S, Kim D et al (2007) A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study. Diabetologia 50:259–267 DOI 10.​1007/​s00125-007-0653-9
2.
go back to reference Boehm BO, Home PD, Behrend C et al (2002) Premixed insulin aspart 30 vs premixed human insulin 30/70 twice daily: a randomized trial in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 19:393–399CrossRefPubMed Boehm BO, Home PD, Behrend C et al (2002) Premixed insulin aspart 30 vs premixed human insulin 30/70 twice daily: a randomized trial in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 19:393–399CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Janka HU, Plewe G, Riddle MC et al (2005) Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28:254–259CrossRefPubMed Janka HU, Plewe G, Riddle MC et al (2005) Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28:254–259CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nauck MA, Duran S, Kim D et al (2007) A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study. Diabetologia 50:259–267CrossRefPubMed Nauck MA, Duran S, Kim D et al (2007) A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study. Diabetologia 50:259–267CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rosenstock J, Dailey G, Massi-Benedetti M et al (2005) Reduced hypoglycemia risk with insulin glargine. Diabetes Care 28:950–955CrossRefPubMed Rosenstock J, Dailey G, Massi-Benedetti M et al (2005) Reduced hypoglycemia risk with insulin glargine. Diabetes Care 28:950–955CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich JE, Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators (2003) The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 26:3080–3086CrossRefPubMed Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich JE, Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators (2003) The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 26:3080–3086CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Heine RJ, Van Gaal L, Johns D et al (2005) Exenatide vs insulin glargine in patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 143:559–569PubMed Heine RJ, Van Gaal L, Johns D et al (2005) Exenatide vs insulin glargine in patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 143:559–569PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hermansen K, Colombo M, Storgaard H et al (2002) Improved postprandial glycemic control with biphasic insulin aspart relative to biphasic insulin lispro and biphasic human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:883–888CrossRefPubMed Hermansen K, Colombo M, Storgaard H et al (2002) Improved postprandial glycemic control with biphasic insulin aspart relative to biphasic insulin lispro and biphasic human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:883–888CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Response to comment on: Nauck MA, Duran S, Kim D et al (2007) A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study. Diabetologia 50:259–267
Authors
M. A. Nauck
M. Trautman
R. Brodows
D. Johns
J. Northrup
D. Kim
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-007-0680-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Diabetologia 7/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.