Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2018

01-10-2018 | Melanoma

Resection Margins in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Is a 1-cm Margin Wide Enough?

Authors: Matthew C. Perez, MD, Felipe R. de Pinho, MD, Amanda Holstein, BS, Daniel E. Oliver, MD, Syeda M. H. Naqvi, MD, MPH, Youngchul Kim, PhD, Jane L. Messina, MD, Erin Burke, MD, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, MD, Amod A. Sarnaik, MD, C. Wayne Cruse, MD, Evan J. Wuthrick, MD, Louis B. Harrison, MD, Vernon K. Sondak, MD, Jonathan S. Zager, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Guidelines regarding specific resection margins for primary Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) are not well established. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend 1- to 2-cm resection margins. This study aimed to determine the impact of margin width on local recurrence (LR), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and type of wound closure.

Methods

All patients who underwent resection of primary MCC at a single institution from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

A total of 240 patients underwent resection of primary MCC with resection margin width identified in the operative report. The median age was 76 years, and 65.8% of the patients were men. Of the 240 patients, 85 (35.4%) had head and neck primaries, 140 (58.3%) had extremity primaries, and 15 (6.3%) had trunk primaries. In terms of margins, 69 patients (28.8%) had a margin of 1 cm, 36 patients (15%) had a margin of 1.1–1.9 cm, and 135 patients (56.2%) had a margin of 2 cm or more. The median follow-up period was 21 months. The LR rate was 2.9% for a margin of 1 cm, 2.8% for a margin of 1.1–1.9 cm, and 5.2% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.80). The 5-year OS was 63.6% for a margin of 1 cm, 59.7% for a margin of 1.1–1.9, and 70.7% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.66). The 5-year DSS was 80.3% for a margin of 1 cm, 66.2% for a margin of 1.1–1.9 cm, and 91.8% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.28). For wound closure, 43.5, 50, and 65.9% of the patients respectively required a flap or graft with a margin of 1, 1.1–1.9, and 2 cm or more (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

A 1-cm resection margins did not increase the risk of LR. Margin width did not make a significant difference in DSS or OS. Larger resection margins increase the need for a graft or flap closure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Toker C. Trabecular carcinoma of the skin. Arch Dermatol. 1972;105:107–10.CrossRef Toker C. Trabecular carcinoma of the skin. Arch Dermatol. 1972;105:107–10.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Paulson KG, Park SY, Vandeven NA, Lachance K, Thomas H, Chapuis AG, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: current United States incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:457–63.CrossRef Paulson KG, Park SY, Vandeven NA, Lachance K, Thomas H, Chapuis AG, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: current United States incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:457–63.CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Rollison DE, Giuliano AR, Becker JC. New virus associated with Merkel cell carcinoma development. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2010;8:874–80.CrossRef Rollison DE, Giuliano AR, Becker JC. New virus associated with Merkel cell carcinoma development. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2010;8:874–80.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bichakjian CK, Olencki T, Alam M, Andersen JS, Berg D, Bowen GM, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma, version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12:410–24.CrossRef Bichakjian CK, Olencki T, Alam M, Andersen JS, Berg D, Bowen GM, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma, version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12:410–24.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Allen PJ, Bowne WB, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, Busam K, Coit DG. Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2300–9.CrossRef Allen PJ, Bowne WB, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, Busam K, Coit DG. Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2300–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Doepker MP, Thompson ZJ, Fisher KJ, Yamamoto M, Nethers KW, Harb JN, et al. Is a wider margin (2 cm vs 1 cm) for a 1.01–2.0-mm melanoma necessary? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2336–42.CrossRef Doepker MP, Thompson ZJ, Fisher KJ, Yamamoto M, Nethers KW, Harb JN, et al. Is a wider margin (2 cm vs 1 cm) for a 1.01–2.0-mm melanoma necessary? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2336–42.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ghadjar P, Kaanders JH, Poortmans P, Zaucha R, Krengli M, Lagrange JL, et al. The essential role of radiotherapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: a study from the Rare Cancer Network. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:e583–91.CrossRef Ghadjar P, Kaanders JH, Poortmans P, Zaucha R, Krengli M, Lagrange JL, et al. The essential role of radiotherapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: a study from the Rare Cancer Network. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:e583–91.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Strom T, Carr M, Zager JS, Naghavi A, Smith FO, Cruse CW, et al. Radiation therapy is associated with improved outcomes in Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3572–8.CrossRef Strom T, Carr M, Zager JS, Naghavi A, Smith FO, Cruse CW, et al. Radiation therapy is associated with improved outcomes in Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3572–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kang SH, Haydu LE, Goh RY, Fogarty GB. Radiotherapy is associated with significant improvement in local and regional control in Merkel cell carcinoma. Radiation Oncol London, England. 2012;7:171.CrossRef Kang SH, Haydu LE, Goh RY, Fogarty GB. Radiotherapy is associated with significant improvement in local and regional control in Merkel cell carcinoma. Radiation Oncol London, England. 2012;7:171.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nahhas AF, Scarbrough CA, Trotter S. A review of the global guidelines on surgical margins for nonmelanoma skin cancers. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017;10:37–46.PubMedPubMedCentral Nahhas AF, Scarbrough CA, Trotter S. A review of the global guidelines on surgical margins for nonmelanoma skin cancers. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017;10:37–46.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Adamus J, Balch C, Bandiera D, Barchuk A, et al. Thin stage I primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: comparison of excision with margins of 1 or 3 cm. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1159–62.CrossRef Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Adamus J, Balch C, Bandiera D, Barchuk A, et al. Thin stage I primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: comparison of excision with margins of 1 or 3 cm. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1159–62.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Karakousis CP, Balch CM, Urist MM, Ross MM, Smith TJ, Bartolucci AA. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3:446–52.CrossRef Karakousis CP, Balch CM, Urist MM, Ross MM, Smith TJ, Bartolucci AA. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3:446–52.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cohn-Cedermark G, Rutqvist LE, Andersson R, Breivald M, Ingvar C, Johansson H, et al. Long-term results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8–2.0 mm. Cancer. 2000;89:1495–501.CrossRef Cohn-Cedermark G, Rutqvist LE, Andersson R, Breivald M, Ingvar C, Johansson H, et al. Long-term results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8–2.0 mm. Cancer. 2000;89:1495–501.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Balch CM, Soong SJ, Smith T, Ross MI, Urist MM, Karakousis CP, et al. Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2-cm vs 4-cm excision margins for 740 patients with 1–4 mm melanomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:101–8.PubMed Balch CM, Soong SJ, Smith T, Ross MI, Urist MM, Karakousis CP, et al. Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2-cm vs 4-cm excision margins for 740 patients with 1–4 mm melanomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:101–8.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Thomas JM, Newton-Bishop J, A’Hern R, Coombes G, Timmons M, Evans J, et al. Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:757–66.CrossRef Thomas JM, Newton-Bishop J, A’Hern R, Coombes G, Timmons M, Evans J, et al. Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:757–66.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lens MB, Nathan P, Bataille V. Excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma: updated pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2007;142:885–91. (discussion 91–3).CrossRef Lens MB, Nathan P, Bataille V. Excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma: updated pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2007;142:885–91. (discussion 91–3).CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hudson LE, Maithel SK, Carlson GW, Rizzo M, Murray DR, Hestley AC, et al. 1- or 2-cm margins of excision for T2 melanomas: do they impact recurrence or survival? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:346–51.CrossRef Hudson LE, Maithel SK, Carlson GW, Rizzo M, Murray DR, Hestley AC, et al. 1- or 2-cm margins of excision for T2 melanomas: do they impact recurrence or survival? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:346–51.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Becker J, Mauch C, Kortmann RD, Keilholz U, Bootz F, Garbe C, et al. Short German guidelines: Merkel cell carcinoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008(6 Suppl 1):S15–6.CrossRef Becker J, Mauch C, Kortmann RD, Keilholz U, Bootz F, Garbe C, et al. Short German guidelines: Merkel cell carcinoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008(6 Suppl 1):S15–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Frohm ML, Griffith KA, Harms KL, Hayman JA, Fullen DR, Nelson CC, et al. Recurrence and survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma undergoing surgery without adjuvant radiation therapy to the primary site. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:1001–7.CrossRef Frohm ML, Griffith KA, Harms KL, Hayman JA, Fullen DR, Nelson CC, et al. Recurrence and survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma undergoing surgery without adjuvant radiation therapy to the primary site. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:1001–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Harms KL, Healy MA, Nghiem P, Sober AJ, Johnson TM, Bichakjian CK, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors from 9387 Merkel cell carcinoma cases forms the basis for the new 8th edition AJCC staging system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3564–71.CrossRef Harms KL, Healy MA, Nghiem P, Sober AJ, Johnson TM, Bichakjian CK, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors from 9387 Merkel cell carcinoma cases forms the basis for the new 8th edition AJCC staging system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3564–71.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Meeuwissen JA, Bourne RG, Kearsley JH. The importance of postoperative radiation therapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat. Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:325–31.CrossRef Meeuwissen JA, Bourne RG, Kearsley JH. The importance of postoperative radiation therapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat. Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:325–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Resection Margins in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Is a 1-cm Margin Wide Enough?
Authors
Matthew C. Perez, MD
Felipe R. de Pinho, MD
Amanda Holstein, BS
Daniel E. Oliver, MD
Syeda M. H. Naqvi, MD, MPH
Youngchul Kim, PhD
Jane L. Messina, MD
Erin Burke, MD
Ricardo J. Gonzalez, MD
Amod A. Sarnaik, MD
C. Wayne Cruse, MD
Evan J. Wuthrick, MD
Louis B. Harrison, MD
Vernon K. Sondak, MD
Jonathan S. Zager, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6688-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2018 Go to the issue