Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2018

Open Access 01-10-2018 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Superiority of Tumor Location-Modified Lauren Classification System for Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Validation Analysis

Authors: Lin-Yong Zhao, MD, PhD, Jun-Jiang Wang, MD, PhD, Yong-Liang Zhao, MD, PhD, Xin-Zu Chen, MD, PhD, Kun Yang, MD, PhD, Xiao-Long Chen, MD, PhD, Wei-Han Zhang, MD, PhD, Kai Liu, MD, PhD, Xiao-Hai Song, MD, PhD, Jia-Bin Zheng, MD, PhD, Zong-Guang Zhou, MD, PhD, Pei-Wu Yu, MD, PhD, Yong Li, MD, PhD, Jian-Kun Hu, MD, PhD, FRCS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The tumor location-modified Lauren classification (mLC) has been proposed recently, but its clinical significance remains under debate. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical relevance of mLC and evaluate its superiority to the Lauren classification (LC) for gastric cancer patients with gastrectomy.

Methods

This study retrospectively evaluated 2764 consecutive gastric cancer patients from three comprehensive medical institutions. The patients were categorized into training, inner-validation, and independent validation sets. The relationships between mLC and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed, and independent prognostic factors were identified. Survival prognostic discriminatory ability and predictive accuracy were compared between mLC and LC using the concordance index (C-index) and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), and a nomogram based on mLC was constructed to compare its prognostic improvement with the tumor-node metastasis (TNM) staging system.

Results

A significant association between mLC and gender, age, histologic type, T stage, N stage, and M stage was found. The findings showed that mLC, not LC, is an independent prognostic factor, with a smaller AIC and a higher C-index than LC. The nomogram based on mLC showed a better predictive ability than TNM alone.

Conclusions

Compared with LC, mLC, which could be considered a more reliable prognostic factor, may improve the prognostic discriminatory ability and predictive accuracy for gastric cancer patients with gastrectomy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–32.CrossRef Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–32.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma: an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49.CrossRef Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma: an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Monig S, Baldus SE, Collet PH, et al. Histological grading in gastric cancer by Goseki classification: correlation with histopathological subtypes and prognosis. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:617–20.PubMed Monig S, Baldus SE, Collet PH, et al. Histological grading in gastric cancer by Goseki classification: correlation with histopathological subtypes and prognosis. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:617–20.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Calli Demirkan N, Tuncyurek M, Ugur Ertan E, Bulent Alkanat M, Icoz G. Correlation of histological classifications of gastric carcinomas with location and prognosis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2002;26:610–15.PubMed Calli Demirkan N, Tuncyurek M, Ugur Ertan E, Bulent Alkanat M, Icoz G. Correlation of histological classifications of gastric carcinomas with location and prognosis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2002;26:610–15.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sakaguchi T, Watanabe A, Sawada H, et al. Characteristics and clinical outcome of proximal-third gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:352–7.CrossRef Sakaguchi T, Watanabe A, Sawada H, et al. Characteristics and clinical outcome of proximal-third gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:352–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:354–62.CrossRef Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:354–62.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference You WC, Blot WJ, Li JY, et al. Precancerous gastric lesions in a population at high risk of stomach cancer. Cancer Res. 1993;53:1317–21.PubMed You WC, Blot WJ, Li JY, et al. Precancerous gastric lesions in a population at high risk of stomach cancer. Cancer Res. 1993;53:1317–21.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Peek RM Jr, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:28–37.CrossRef Peek RM Jr, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:28–37.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:784–9.CrossRef Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:784–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carneiro F, Huntsman DG, Smyrk TC, et al. Model of the early development of diffuse gastric cancer in E-cadherin mutation carriers and its implications for patient screening. J Pathol. 2004;203:681–7.CrossRef Carneiro F, Huntsman DG, Smyrk TC, et al. Model of the early development of diffuse gastric cancer in E-cadherin mutation carriers and its implications for patient screening. J Pathol. 2004;203:681–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shah MA, Khanin R, Tang L, et al. Molecular classification of gastric cancer: a new paradigm. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:2693–701.CrossRef Shah MA, Khanin R, Tang L, et al. Molecular classification of gastric cancer: a new paradigm. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:2693–701.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7252–9.CrossRef Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7252–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3077–9.CrossRef Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3077–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ma H, Bandos AI, Gur D. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests. Biometric J Biometrische Zeitschrift. 2015;57:304–20.CrossRef Ma H, Bandos AI, Gur D. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests. Biometric J Biometrische Zeitschrift. 2015;57:304–20.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Huitzil-Melendez FD, Capanu M, O’Reilly EM, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2889–95.CrossRef Huitzil-Melendez FD, Capanu M, O’Reilly EM, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2889–95.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zhao LY, Li CC, Jia LY, et al. Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center. Oncotarget. 2016;7:51069–81.PubMedPubMedCentral Zhao LY, Li CC, Jia LY, et al. Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center. Oncotarget. 2016;7:51069–81.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Stemmermann GN, Brown C. A survival study of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1974;33:1190–5.CrossRef Stemmermann GN, Brown C. A survival study of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1974;33:1190–5.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Munoz N, Correa P, Cuello C, Duque E. Histologic types of gastric carcinoma in high- and low-risk areas. Int J Cancer. 1968;3:809–18.CrossRef Munoz N, Correa P, Cuello C, Duque E. Histologic types of gastric carcinoma in high- and low-risk areas. Int J Cancer. 1968;3:809–18.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kim KH, Chi CH, Lee SK, Lee D, Kubo T. Histologic types of gastric carcinoma among Koreans. Cancer. 1972;29:1261–3.CrossRef Kim KH, Chi CH, Lee SK, Lee D, Kubo T. Histologic types of gastric carcinoma among Koreans. Cancer. 1972;29:1261–3.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Choi JK, Park YS, Jung do H, et al. Clinical relevance of the tumor location-modified Lauren classification system of gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2015;15:183–90.CrossRef Choi JK, Park YS, Jung do H, et al. Clinical relevance of the tumor location-modified Lauren classification system of gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2015;15:183–90.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yang K, Choi YY, Zhang WH, et al. Strategies to improve treatment outcome in gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of patients from two high-volume hospitals in Korea and China. Oncotarget. 2016;7:44660–75.PubMedPubMedCentral Yang K, Choi YY, Zhang WH, et al. Strategies to improve treatment outcome in gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of patients from two high-volume hospitals in Korea and China. Oncotarget. 2016;7:44660–75.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Rice TW, Rusch VW, Ishwaran H, Blackstone EH. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals. Cancer. 2010;116:3763–73.CrossRef Rice TW, Rusch VW, Ishwaran H, Blackstone EH. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals. Cancer. 2010;116:3763–73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Superiority of Tumor Location-Modified Lauren Classification System for Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Validation Analysis
Authors
Lin-Yong Zhao, MD, PhD
Jun-Jiang Wang, MD, PhD
Yong-Liang Zhao, MD, PhD
Xin-Zu Chen, MD, PhD
Kun Yang, MD, PhD
Xiao-Long Chen, MD, PhD
Wei-Han Zhang, MD, PhD
Kai Liu, MD, PhD
Xiao-Hai Song, MD, PhD
Jia-Bin Zheng, MD, PhD
Zong-Guang Zhou, MD, PhD
Pei-Wu Yu, MD, PhD
Yong Li, MD, PhD
Jian-Kun Hu, MD, PhD, FRCS
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6654-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2018 Go to the issue