Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process

Authors: Luz Isabel Romero, Cristiane Quental

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Panama is, economically, the fastest growing country in Central America and is making efforts to improve management mechanisms for research and innovation. However, due to contextual factors, the Panamanian Health Research System is not well developed and is poorly coordinated with the Health System. Likewise, despite recent efforts to define a National Health Research Agenda, implementing this agenda and aligning it with Panamanians’ health needs remains difficult. This articles aims to review Panama’s experience in health research priority setting by analyzing the fairness of previous prioritization processes in order to promote an agreed-upon national agenda aligned with public health needs.

Methods

The three health research prioritization processes performed in Panama between 2006 and 2011 were analyzed based on the guidelines established by the four “Accountability for Reasonableness” principles, namely “relevance”, “publicity”, “revision”, and “enforcement”, which provide a framework for evaluating priority-setting fairness.

Results

The three health research priority-setting events performed in Panama during the reference period demonstrated a heterogeneous pattern of decision-making strategies, stakeholder group composition, and prioritization outcomes. None of the three analyzed events featured an open discussion process with the scientific community, health care providers, or civil society in order to reach consensus.

Conclusions

This investigation makes evident the lack of a strategy to encourage open discussion by the multiple stakeholders and interest groups that should be involved during the priority-setting process. The analysis reveals the need for a new priority-setting exercise that validates the National Agenda, promotes its implementation by the National Secretariat for Science, Technology and Innovation in conjunction with the Ministry of Health, and empowers multiple stakeholders; such an exercise would, in turn, favor the implementation of the agenda.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kapiriri L, Martin DK: A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries. Health Care Anal. 2007, 15: 159-167.CrossRefPubMed Kapiriri L, Martin DK: A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries. Health Care Anal. 2007, 15: 159-167.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rudan I: Global health research priorities: mobilizing the developing world. Public Health. 2012, 126 (3): 237-240.CrossRefPubMed Rudan I: Global health research priorities: mobilizing the developing world. Public Health. 2012, 126 (3): 237-240.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ranson MK, Bennett SC: Priority setting and health policy and systems research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009, 27 (7): 1-7. Ranson MK, Bennett SC: Priority setting and health policy and systems research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009, 27 (7): 1-7.
4.
go back to reference Guimarães R: Bases para uma política nacional de ciência, tecnologia e novação em saúde. Ciên Saúde Coletiva. 2004, 9 (2): 375-387. [In Portuguese]CrossRef Guimarães R: Bases para uma política nacional de ciência, tecnologia e novação em saúde. Ciên Saúde Coletiva. 2004, 9 (2): 375-387. [In Portuguese]CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tomlinson M, Chopra M, Hoosain N, Rudan I: A review of selected research priority setting processes at national level in low and middle income countries: towards fair and legitimate priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011, 19 (9): 1-7. Tomlinson M, Chopra M, Hoosain N, Rudan I: A review of selected research priority setting processes at national level in low and middle income countries: towards fair and legitimate priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011, 19 (9): 1-7.
6.
go back to reference Reveiz L, Elias V, Terry RF, Alger J, Becerra-Posada F: Comparison of national health research priority-setting methods and characteristics in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2002–2012. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013, 34 (1): 1-13.PubMed Reveiz L, Elias V, Terry RF, Alger J, Becerra-Posada F: Comparison of national health research priority-setting methods and characteristics in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2002–2012. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013, 34 (1): 1-13.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Diéguez J, Alvarado R: Pobreza e indigencia en 2011. Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas. Encuesta de Mercado de Trabajo, Panamá. 2011, file:///C:/Users/lromero/Downloads/MEF%20POBREZA%20E%20INDIGENCIA%20EN%202011%20(2).pdf] Accessed 4 December 2013 Diéguez J, Alvarado R: Pobreza e indigencia en 2011. Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas. Encuesta de Mercado de Trabajo, Panamá. 2011, file:///C:/Users/lromero/Downloads/MEF%20POBREZA%20E%20INDIGENCIA%20EN%202011%20(2).pdf] Accessed 4 December 2013
11.
go back to reference Chamorro F, Bayard V, De Rivera A, Gomez B, Hurtado L, De Crespo MV, De la Cruz M: Muertes Prematuras en Panamá: Una Estimación de la Mortalidad Evitable en 1990 y 2000. 2006, Panamá: Centro de Información y Documentación en Salud Chamorro F, Bayard V, De Rivera A, Gomez B, Hurtado L, De Crespo MV, De la Cruz M: Muertes Prematuras en Panamá: Una Estimación de la Mortalidad Evitable en 1990 y 2000. 2006, Panamá: Centro de Información y Documentación en Salud
14.
go back to reference Romero LI, Quental C: The Panamanian health research system: a baseline analysis for the construction of a new phase. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013, 11: 33-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Romero LI, Quental C: The Panamanian health research system: a baseline analysis for the construction of a new phase. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013, 11: 33-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Kapiriri L, Martin DK: Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation. Health Care Anal. 2010, 18 (2): 129-147.CrossRefPubMed Kapiriri L, Martin DK: Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation. Health Care Anal. 2010, 18 (2): 129-147.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Daniels N, Sabin J: Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Public Aff. 1997, 26: 303-350.CrossRefPubMed Daniels N, Sabin J: Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Public Aff. 1997, 26: 303-350.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Singer PA, Martin DK, Giacomini M, Purdy L: Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study. Br Med J. 2000, 321: 1316-1318.CrossRef Singer PA, Martin DK, Giacomini M, Purdy L: Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study. Br Med J. 2000, 321: 1316-1318.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Martin DK, Giacomini M, Singer PA: Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy. 2003, 61: 279-290.CrossRef Martin DK, Giacomini M, Singer PA: Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy. 2003, 61: 279-290.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Singer PA: Recent advances in medical ethics. Br Med J. 2000, 321: 282-285.CrossRef Singer PA: Recent advances in medical ethics. Br Med J. 2000, 321: 282-285.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Maluka SO: Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania. Global Health Action. 2011, 4: 7829-CrossRef Maluka SO: Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania. Global Health Action. 2011, 4: 7829-CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Byskov J, Bloch P, Blystad A, Hurtig AK, Fylkesnes K, Kamuzora P, Kombe Y, Kvåle G, Marchal B, Martin DK, Michelo C, Ndawi B, Ngulube TJ, Nyamongo I, Olsen OE, Onyango-Ouma W, Sandøy IF, Shayo EH, Silwamba G, Songstad NG, Tuba M: Accountable priority setting for trust in health systems-the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable health action in developing countries. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009, 7: 23-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Byskov J, Bloch P, Blystad A, Hurtig AK, Fylkesnes K, Kamuzora P, Kombe Y, Kvåle G, Marchal B, Martin DK, Michelo C, Ndawi B, Ngulube TJ, Nyamongo I, Olsen OE, Onyango-Ouma W, Sandøy IF, Shayo EH, Silwamba G, Songstad NG, Tuba M: Accountable priority setting for trust in health systems-the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable health action in developing countries. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009, 7: 23-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Viergever RF, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF: A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010, 8: 36-PubMedPubMedCentral Viergever RF, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF: A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010, 8: 36-PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Maluka S, Kamuzora P, SanSebastián M, Byskov J, Ndawi B, Olsen OE, Hurtig A-N: Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Implement Sci. 2011, 6: 11-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maluka S, Kamuzora P, SanSebastián M, Byskov J, Ndawi B, Olsen OE, Hurtig A-N: Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Implement Sci. 2011, 6: 11-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Younghong S, Kapiriri L, Baltussen R: Setting priorities for health interventions in developing countries: a review of empirical studies. Trop Med Int Health. 2009, 14: 930-939.CrossRef Younghong S, Kapiriri L, Baltussen R: Setting priorities for health interventions in developing countries: a review of empirical studies. Trop Med Int Health. 2009, 14: 930-939.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Commission on Health Research and Development: Priority setting for health research: Lessons from developing countries. Health Policy Plan. 2000, 15 (2): 130-136.CrossRef Commission on Health Research and Development: Priority setting for health research: Lessons from developing countries. Health Policy Plan. 2000, 15 (2): 130-136.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pacheco Santos LM, Moura EC, Barradas Barata Rde C, Serruya SJ, da Motta ML, Silva Elias FT, Angulo-Tuesta A, de Paula AP, de Melo G, Guimarães R, Grabois Gadelha CA: Fulfillment of the Brazilian agenda of priorities in health research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011, 9: 35-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pacheco Santos LM, Moura EC, Barradas Barata Rde C, Serruya SJ, da Motta ML, Silva Elias FT, Angulo-Tuesta A, de Paula AP, de Melo G, Guimarães R, Grabois Gadelha CA: Fulfillment of the Brazilian agenda of priorities in health research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011, 9: 35-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Secretaria Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación: Plan Estratégico Nacional para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación 2010–2014. 2010, Panamá, [http://www.senacyt.gob.pa]. Secretaria Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación: Plan Estratégico Nacional para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación 2010–2014. 2010, Panamá, [http://​www.​senacyt.​gob.​pa].
35.
37.
go back to reference Alger J, Becerra-Posada F, Kennedy A, Martinelli E, Cuervo LG, Grupo Colaborativo de la Primera Conferencia Latinoamericana de Investigación e Innovación para la Salud: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Sistemas nacionales de investigación para la salud en América Latina. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2009, 26 (5): 447-457.PubMed Alger J, Becerra-Posada F, Kennedy A, Martinelli E, Cuervo LG, Grupo Colaborativo de la Primera Conferencia Latinoamericana de Investigación e Innovación para la Salud: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Sistemas nacionales de investigación para la salud en América Latina. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2009, 26 (5): 447-457.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process
Authors
Luz Isabel Romero
Cristiane Quental
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-38

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2014 Go to the issue