Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Commentary

Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency

Authors: Vivian A. Welch, Andrea C. Tricco

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

An increasing number of realist evaluations are being conducted from a wide range of disciplinary perspectives and with diverse, fit-for-purpose methods. This commentary discusses the recent BMC Medicine publication of RAMESES II reporting guidelines for realist evaluations. Knowledge users such as program implementers and decision-makers will benefit from the increased transparency of reporting and interpretation in light of the totality of evidence encouraged by this guidance. It is hoped that these reporting guidelines will eventually lead to improved knowledge synthesis and contribute to the cumulative science regarding realist evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
2.
go back to reference Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. London: Sage; 2013.CrossRef Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. London: Sage; 2013.CrossRef
3.
6.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8), e008567.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8), e008567.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Soobiah C, Antony J, Cogo E, MacDonald H, Lillie E, Tran J, D’Souza J, Hui W, Perrier L. A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:19–28.CrossRefPubMed Tricco AC, Soobiah C, Antony J, Cogo E, MacDonald H, Lillie E, Tran J, D’Souza J, Hui W, Perrier L. A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:19–28.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):834–40.CrossRefPubMed Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):834–40.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Authors
Vivian A. Welch
Andrea C. Tricco
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0658-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue