Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 7/2018

01-07-2018

Renal cancer at unenhanced CT: imaging features, detection rates, and outcomes

Authors: Stacy D. O’Connor, Stuart G. Silverman, Laila R. Cochon, Ramin K. Khorasani

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and quantify the rate of detection of renal cancer on unenhanced CT.

Methods

This retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Electronic health records for all patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal CT at our institution between 2000 and 2005 were reviewed to identify patients subsequently diagnosed with renal cancer during a follow-up period of up to 12 years. Images were reviewed to determine if the cancer was visible at index (first) unenhanced CT and their findings recorded. Original radiology reports were reviewed to determine whether the renal cancer was reported; Fisher’s Exact Test compared imaging features of detected and missed cancers. Clinical outcomes including time until diagnosis and stage at diagnosis were used to assess the potential impact of missed cancers.

Results

Of 15,695 patients, 82 (0.52%) were diagnosed with renal cancer. Of these, 43/82 (52%) cancers were retrospectively detectable on index unenhanced CT. Among retrospectively detectable cancers, 63% (27/43) were originally detected and reported on index CT and 37% (16/43) were missed. Size was the only feature associated with detection; 83% (20/24) of cancers > 3.0 cm were detected versus 37% (7/19) of cancers ≤ 3.0 cm (p = 0.0036). Although none of the 16 missed renal cancers developed metastases between index CT and time of diagnosis (median 33.5 months), 4 (25%) progressed in stage.

Conclusions

Renal cancer was rare in patients undergoing unenhanced abdominal CT. Over one-third of potentially detectable cancers were missed prospectively. However, missed cancers did not metastasize and infrequently progressed in stage before being diagnosed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jayson M, Sanders H (1998) Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51(2):203–205CrossRefPubMed Jayson M, Sanders H (1998) Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51(2):203–205CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology 56(1):58–62CrossRefPubMed Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology 56(1):58–62CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Schlomer B, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Venkatesh R, Bhayani SB (2006) Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology. J Urol 176(4):1317–1320 (discussion 1320)CrossRefPubMed Schlomer B, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Venkatesh R, Bhayani SB (2006) Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology. J Urol 176(4):1317–1320 (discussion 1320)CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rabjerg M, Mikkelsen MN, Walter S, Marcussen N (2014) Incidental renal neoplasms: is there a need for routine screening? A Danish single-center epidemiological study. APMIS 122(8):708–714CrossRefPubMed Rabjerg M, Mikkelsen MN, Walter S, Marcussen N (2014) Incidental renal neoplasms: is there a need for routine screening? A Danish single-center epidemiological study. APMIS 122(8):708–714CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2008) Pitfalls in Renal Mass Evaluation and How to Avoid Them. RadioGraphics 28(5):1325–1338CrossRefPubMed Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2008) Pitfalls in Renal Mass Evaluation and How to Avoid Them. RadioGraphics 28(5):1325–1338CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, Richie JP (2008) Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 249(1):16–31CrossRefPubMed Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, Richie JP (2008) Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 249(1):16–31CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2005) An update of the Bosniak renal cyst classification system. Urology 66(3):484–488CrossRefPubMed Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2005) An update of the Bosniak renal cyst classification system. Urology 66(3):484–488CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Silverman SG, Israel GM, Trinh Q-D (2015) Incompletely characterized incidental renal masses: emerging data support conservative management. Radiology 275(1):28–42CrossRefPubMed Silverman SG, Israel GM, Trinh Q-D (2015) Incompletely characterized incidental renal masses: emerging data support conservative management. Radiology 275(1):28–42CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Akita H, et al. (2014) Renal angiomyolipoma: a radiological classification and update on recent developments in diagnosis and management. Abdom Imaging 39(3):588–604CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Akita H, et al. (2014) Renal angiomyolipoma: a radiological classification and update on recent developments in diagnosis and management. Abdom Imaging 39(3):588–604CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Jonisch AI, Rubinowitz AN, Mutalik PG, Israel GM (2007) Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT? Radiology 243(2):445–450CrossRefPubMed Jonisch AI, Rubinowitz AN, Mutalik PG, Israel GM (2007) Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT? Radiology 243(2):445–450CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference O’Connor SD, Silverman SG, Ip IK, Maehara CK, Khorasani R (2013) Simple cyst-appearing renal masses at unenhanced CT: can they be presumed to be benign? Radiology 269(3):793–800CrossRefPubMed O’Connor SD, Silverman SG, Ip IK, Maehara CK, Khorasani R (2013) Simple cyst-appearing renal masses at unenhanced CT: can they be presumed to be benign? Radiology 269(3):793–800CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pooler BD, Pickhardt PJ, O’Connor SD, et al. (2012) Renal cell carcinoma: attenuation values on unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(5):1115–1120CrossRefPubMed Pooler BD, Pickhardt PJ, O’Connor SD, et al. (2012) Renal cell carcinoma: attenuation values on unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(5):1115–1120CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference O’Connor SD, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Oliva MR, Silverman SG (2011) Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management. Am J Roentgenol 197(1):139–145CrossRef O’Connor SD, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Oliva MR, Silverman SG (2011) Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management. Am J Roentgenol 197(1):139–145CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jung SI, Park HS, Kim YJ, Jeon HJ (2014) Unenhanced CT for the detection of renal cell carcinoma: effect of tumor size and contour type. Abdominal Imaging 39(2):348–357CrossRefPubMed Jung SI, Park HS, Kim YJ, Jeon HJ (2014) Unenhanced CT for the detection of renal cell carcinoma: effect of tumor size and contour type. Abdominal Imaging 39(2):348–357CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sahi K, Jackson S, Wiebe E, et al. (2014) The value of “liver windows” settings in the detection of small renal cell carcinomas on unenhanced computed tomography. Can Assoc Radiol J 65(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed Sahi K, Jackson S, Wiebe E, et al. (2014) The value of “liver windows” settings in the detection of small renal cell carcinomas on unenhanced computed tomography. Can Assoc Radiol J 65(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Donald JJ, Barnard SA (2012) Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors: Common patterns of diagnostic errors. J Med Imaging and Radiat Oncol 56(2):173–178CrossRef Donald JJ, Barnard SA (2012) Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors: Common patterns of diagnostic errors. J Med Imaging and Radiat Oncol 56(2):173–178CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Horton KM, Johnson PT, Fishman EK (2010) MDCT of the abdomen: common misdiagnoses at a busy academic center. Am J Roentgenol 194(3):660–667CrossRef Horton KM, Johnson PT, Fishman EK (2010) MDCT of the abdomen: common misdiagnoses at a busy academic center. Am J Roentgenol 194(3):660–667CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. (eds) (2002) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. New York: Springer Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. (eds) (2002) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. New York: Springer
19.
go back to reference Evans KK, Birdwell RL, Wolfe JM (2013) If you don’t find it often, you often don’t find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening. PLoS ONE 8(5):e64366CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Evans KK, Birdwell RL, Wolfe JM (2013) If you don’t find it often, you often don’t find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening. PLoS ONE 8(5):e64366CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, et al. (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175(2):425–431CrossRefPubMed Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, et al. (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175(2):425–431CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG (2008) Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma–a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 179(4):1227–1234CrossRefPubMed Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG (2008) Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma–a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 179(4):1227–1234CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mues AC, Haramis G, Badani K, et al. (2010) Active surveillance for larger (cT1bN0M0 and cT2N0M0) renal cortical neoplasms. Urology 76(3):620–623CrossRefPubMed Mues AC, Haramis G, Badani K, et al. (2010) Active surveillance for larger (cT1bN0M0 and cT2N0M0) renal cortical neoplasms. Urology 76(3):620–623CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Haramis G, Mues AC, Rosales JC, et al. (2011) Natural history of renal cortical neoplasms during active surveillance with follow-up longer than 5 years. Urology 77(4):787–791CrossRefPubMed Haramis G, Mues AC, Rosales JC, et al. (2011) Natural history of renal cortical neoplasms during active surveillance with follow-up longer than 5 years. Urology 77(4):787–791CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Krupinski EA (2010) Current perspectives in medical image perception. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(5):1205–1217CrossRefPubMed Krupinski EA (2010) Current perspectives in medical image perception. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(5):1205–1217CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Provenzale JM, Kranz PG (2011) Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology. Emerg Radiol. 18(5):403–408CrossRefPubMed Provenzale JM, Kranz PG (2011) Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology. Emerg Radiol. 18(5):403–408CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tay MHW, Thamboo TP, Wu FMW, et al. (2014) High R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scores are associated with pathologic upstaging of clinical T1 renal-cell carcinomas in radical nephrectomy specimens: implications for nephron-sparing surgery. J Endourol 28(9):1138–1142CrossRefPubMed Tay MHW, Thamboo TP, Wu FMW, et al. (2014) High R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scores are associated with pathologic upstaging of clinical T1 renal-cell carcinomas in radical nephrectomy specimens: implications for nephron-sparing surgery. J Endourol 28(9):1138–1142CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Renal cancer at unenhanced CT: imaging features, detection rates, and outcomes
Authors
Stacy D. O’Connor
Stuart G. Silverman
Laila R. Cochon
Ramin K. Khorasani
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1376-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Abdominal Radiology 7/2018 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Spinnaker sail sign

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.