Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 2/2014

Open Access 01-02-2014 | Original Article

Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Devices in the Pediatric Population Improves Detection of Adverse Events

Authors: Lindsey E. Malloy, Jean Gingerich, Mark D. Olson, Dianne L. Atkins

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

With the exponential growth of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in pediatric patients, a new method of long-term surveillance, remote monitoring (RM), has become the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of RM as a monitoring tool in the pediatric population. A retrospective review was performed of 198 patients at the University of Iowa Children’s Hospital who had CIEDs. Data transmitted by RM were analyzed. The following data were examined: patient demographics; median interval between transmissions; detection of adverse events requiring corrective measures, including detection of lead failure; detection of arrhythmias and device malfunctions independent of symptoms; time gained in the detection of events using RM versus standard practice; the validity of RM; and the impact of RM on data management. Of 198 patients, 162 submitted 615 RM transmissions. The median time between remote transmissions was 91 days. Of 615 total transmissions, 16 % had true adverse events with 11 % prompting clinical intervention. Of those events requiring clinical response, 61 % of patients reported symptoms. The median interval between last follow-up and occurrence of events detected by RM was 46 days, representing a gain of 134 days for patients followed-up at 6-month intervals and 44 days for patients followed-up at 3 month-intervals. The sensitivity and specificity of RM were found to be 99 and 72 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 41 and 99 %, respectively. RM allows for early identification of arrhythmias and device malfunctions, thus prompting earlier corrective measures and improving care and safety in pediatric patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen J, Wilkoff BL, Choucair W, Cohen TJ, Crossley GH, Johnson WB et al (2008) Design of the Pacemaker REmote Follow-up Evaluation and Review (PREFER) trial to assess the clinical value of the remote pacemaker interrogation in the management of pacemaker patients. Trials 9:18PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chen J, Wilkoff BL, Choucair W, Cohen TJ, Crossley GH, Johnson WB et al (2008) Design of the Pacemaker REmote Follow-up Evaluation and Review (PREFER) trial to assess the clinical value of the remote pacemaker interrogation in the management of pacemaker patients. Trials 9:18PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hauser RG, Kallinen LM, Almquist AK, Gornick CC, Katsiyiannis WT (2007) Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead. Heart Rhythm 4(7):892–896CrossRefPubMed Hauser RG, Kallinen LM, Almquist AK, Gornick CC, Katsiyiannis WT (2007) Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead. Heart Rhythm 4(7):892–896CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Joglar JA (2009) Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: new questions raised. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32(12):1489–1491CrossRefPubMed Joglar JA (2009) Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: new questions raised. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32(12):1489–1491CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lazarus A (2007) Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 30(Suppl 1):S2–S12PubMed Lazarus A (2007) Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 30(Suppl 1):S2–S12PubMed
5.
go back to reference Mabo P, Victor F, Bazin P, Ahres S, Babuty D, Da Costa A et al (2012) A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (the COMPAS trial). Eur Heart J 33(9):1105–1111PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Mabo P, Victor F, Bazin P, Ahres S, Babuty D, Da Costa A et al (2012) A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (the COMPAS trial). Eur Heart J 33(9):1105–1111PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Movsowitz C, Mittal S (2011) Remote patient management using implantable devices. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 31(1):81–90CrossRefPubMed Movsowitz C, Mittal S (2011) Remote patient management using implantable devices. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 31(1):81–90CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Raatikainen MJ, Uusimaa P, van Ginneken MM, Janssen JP, Linnaluoto M (2008) Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up. Europace 10(10):1145–1151PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Raatikainen MJ, Uusimaa P, van Ginneken MM, Janssen JP, Linnaluoto M (2008) Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up. Europace 10(10):1145–1151PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sticherling C, Kuhne M, Schaer B, Altmann D, Osswald S (2009) Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: prerequisite or luxury? Swiss Med Wkly 139(41–42):596–601PubMed Sticherling C, Kuhne M, Schaer B, Altmann D, Osswald S (2009) Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: prerequisite or luxury? Swiss Med Wkly 139(41–42):596–601PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wilkoff BL, Auricchio A, Brugada J, Cowie M, Ellenbogen KA, Gillis AM et al (2008) HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. Heart Rhythm 5(6):907–925CrossRefPubMed Wilkoff BL, Auricchio A, Brugada J, Cowie M, Ellenbogen KA, Gillis AM et al (2008) HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. Heart Rhythm 5(6):907–925CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Devices in the Pediatric Population Improves Detection of Adverse Events
Authors
Lindsey E. Malloy
Jean Gingerich
Mark D. Olson
Dianne L. Atkins
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-013-0774-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Pediatric Cardiology 2/2014 Go to the issue