Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original Article

Relevance of anatomy to medical education and clinical practice: perspectives of medical students, clinicians, and educators

Authors: Amgad Sbayeh, Mohammad A. Qaedi Choo, Kathleen A. Quane, Paul Finucane, Deirdre McGrath, Siun O’Flynn, Siobhain M. O’Mahony, Colm M. P. O’Tuathaigh

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Against a backdrop of ever-changing diagnostic and treatment modalities, stakeholder perceptions (medical students, clinicians, anatomy educators) are crucial for the design of an anatomy curriculum which fulfils the criteria required for safe medical practice. This study compared perceptions of students, practising clinicians, and anatomy educators with respect to the relevance of anatomy education to medicine.

Methods

A quantitative survey was administered to undergraduate entry (n = 352) and graduate entry students (n = 219) at two Irish medical schools, recently graduated Irish clinicians (n = 146), and anatomy educators based in Irish and British medical schools (n = 30). Areas addressed included the association of anatomy with medical education and clinical practice, mode of instruction, and curriculum duration.

Results

Graduate-entry students were less likely to associate anatomy with the development of professionalism, teamwork skills, or improved awareness of ethics in medicine. Clinicians highlighted the challenge of tailoring anatomy education to increase student readiness to function effectively in a clinical role. Anatomy educators indicated dissatisfaction with the time available for anatomy within medical curricula, and were equivocal about whether curriculum content should be responsive to societal feedback.

Conclusions

The group differences identified in the current study highlight areas and requirements which medical education curriculum developers should be sensitive to when designing anatomy courses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:321–5.CrossRef Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:321–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gogalniceanu P, Madani H, Paraskeva PA, Darzi A. A minimally invasive approach to undergraduate anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1:46–7.CrossRef Gogalniceanu P, Madani H, Paraskeva PA, Darzi A. A minimally invasive approach to undergraduate anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1:46–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:253–9.CrossRef Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:253–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, McAndrew D. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80:212–6.CrossRef Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, McAndrew D. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80:212–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF. Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: a case for medical imaging and vertical integration. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:251–61.CrossRef Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF. Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: a case for medical imaging and vertical integration. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:251–61.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference James D, Ferguson E, Powis D, Symonds I, Yates J. Graduate entry to medicine: widening academic and socio-demographic access. Med Educ. 2008;42:294–300.CrossRef James D, Ferguson E, Powis D, Symonds I, Yates J. Graduate entry to medicine: widening academic and socio-demographic access. Med Educ. 2008;42:294–300.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Duggan EM, O’Tuathaigh CM, Horgan M, O’Flynn S. Enhanced research assessment performance in graduate vs. undergraduate-entry medical students: implications for recruitment into academic medicine. QJM. 2014;107:735–41.CrossRef Duggan EM, O’Tuathaigh CM, Horgan M, O’Flynn S. Enhanced research assessment performance in graduate vs. undergraduate-entry medical students: implications for recruitment into academic medicine. QJM. 2014;107:735–41.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Finucane P, Flannery D, McGrath D, Saunders J. Demographic attributes and knowledge acquisition among graduate-entry medical students. Med Teach. 2013;35:134–8.CrossRef Finucane P, Flannery D, McGrath D, Saunders J. Demographic attributes and knowledge acquisition among graduate-entry medical students. Med Teach. 2013;35:134–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sandover S, Jonas-Dwyer D, Marr T. Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:5.CrossRef Sandover S, Jonas-Dwyer D, Marr T. Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lazarus MD, Chinchilli VM, Leong SL, Kauffman GL Jr.. Perceptions of anatomy: critical components in the clinical setting. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:187–99.CrossRef Lazarus MD, Chinchilli VM, Leong SL, Kauffman GL Jr.. Perceptions of anatomy: critical components in the clinical setting. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:187–99.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference World Federation for Medical Education. MEDINE. The Thematic Network in medicine in Europe, WFME global standards for quality improvement in medical education – European specifications 2007. http://www.wfme.org.. World Federation for Medical Education. MEDINE. The Thematic Network in medicine in Europe, WFME global standards for quality improvement in medical education – European specifications 2007. http://​www.​wfme.​org..
12.
go back to reference Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2014;47:9–86. Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2014;47:9–86.
13.
go back to reference Link MW, Mokdad AH. Alternative modes for health surveillance surveys: an experiment with web, mail, and telephone. Epidemiology. 2005;16:701–4.CrossRef Link MW, Mokdad AH. Alternative modes for health surveillance surveys: an experiment with web, mail, and telephone. Epidemiology. 2005;16:701–4.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Spampinato CM, Wittich CM, Beckman TJ, Cha SS, Pawlina W. ‘Safe Harbor’: evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:191–8.CrossRef Spampinato CM, Wittich CM, Beckman TJ, Cha SS, Pawlina W. ‘Safe Harbor’: evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:191–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gale-Grant O, Gatter M, Abel P. Developing ideas of professionalism. Clin Teach. 2013;10:165–9.CrossRef Gale-Grant O, Gatter M, Abel P. Developing ideas of professionalism. Clin Teach. 2013;10:165–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vorstenbosch MA, Kooloos JG, Bolhuis SM, Laan RF. An investigation of anatomical competence in junior medical doctors. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9:8–17.CrossRef Vorstenbosch MA, Kooloos JG, Bolhuis SM, Laan RF. An investigation of anatomical competence in junior medical doctors. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9:8–17.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lachman N, Pawlina W. Integrating professionalism in early medical education: The theory and application of reflective practice in the anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat. 2006;19:456–60.CrossRef Lachman N, Pawlina W. Integrating professionalism in early medical education: The theory and application of reflective practice in the anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat. 2006;19:456–60.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Murphy KP, Crush L, O’Malley E, et al. Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:629–34.CrossRef Murphy KP, Crush L, O’Malley E, et al. Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:629–34.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Carter YH, Peile E. Graduate entry medicine: high aspirations at birth. Clin Med. 2007;7:143–7.CrossRef Carter YH, Peile E. Graduate entry medicine: high aspirations at birth. Clin Med. 2007;7:143–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Halliday N, O’Donoghue D, Klump KE, Thompson B. Human structure in six and one-half weeks: one approach to providing foundational anatomical competency in an era of compressed medical school anatomy curricula. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:149–57.CrossRef Halliday N, O’Donoghue D, Klump KE, Thompson B. Human structure in six and one-half weeks: one approach to providing foundational anatomical competency in an era of compressed medical school anatomy curricula. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:149–57.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference O’Flynn S, Power S, Horgan M, O’Tuathaigh CM. Attitudes towards professionalism in graduate and non-graduate entrants to medical school. Educ Heal. 2014;27:200–4.CrossRef O’Flynn S, Power S, Horgan M, O’Tuathaigh CM. Attitudes towards professionalism in graduate and non-graduate entrants to medical school. Educ Heal. 2014;27:200–4.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kooloos JG, de Waal Malefijt MC, Ruiter DJ, Vorstenbosch MA. Loosely-guided, self-directed learning versus strictly-guided, station-based learning in gross anatomy laboratory sessions. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:340–6.CrossRef Kooloos JG, de Waal Malefijt MC, Ruiter DJ, Vorstenbosch MA. Loosely-guided, self-directed learning versus strictly-guided, station-based learning in gross anatomy laboratory sessions. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:340–6.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kirschner PA, van Merrinboer JJG. Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educ Psychol. 2013;48:169–83.CrossRef Kirschner PA, van Merrinboer JJG. Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educ Psychol. 2013;48:169–83.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pizzimenti MA, Axelson RD. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:104–10.CrossRef Pizzimenti MA, Axelson RD. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:104–10.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference World Federation for Medical Education. Basic medical education WFME global standards for quality improvement. Copenhagen: WFME Office; 2003. World Federation for Medical Education. Basic medical education WFME global standards for quality improvement. Copenhagen: WFME Office; 2003.
Metadata
Title
Relevance of anatomy to medical education and clinical practice: perspectives of medical students, clinicians, and educators
Authors
Amgad Sbayeh
Mohammad A. Qaedi Choo
Kathleen A. Quane
Paul Finucane
Deirdre McGrath
Siun O’Flynn
Siobhain M. O’Mahony
Colm M. P. O’Tuathaigh
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0310-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2016 Go to the issue

Thanks to Reviewers

Thanks to reviewers

Statistical Points and Pitfalls

Effect size – large, medium, and small