Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Trauma Surgery

Relationships between Hoffa fragment size and surgical approach selection: a cadaveric study

Authors: Wich Orapiriyakul, Theerachai Apivatthakakul, Chanakarn Phornphutkul

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Fixation of a small Hoffa fragment requires a selection of the proper surgical approach for reduction and posterior to anterior screws fixation. However, currently there are no guidelines regarding how to select the best approach for small posterior Hoffa fractures.

Objectives

To compare the size of Hoffa fractures that are appropriate for reduction and fixation with the medial parapatellar approach (MPPA) and those which require the direct medial approach (DMA), and to make a similar comparison between the lateral parapatellar approach (LPPA) and the posterolateral approach (PLA).

Materials and methods

Twenty extremities of fresh cadavers were included. After completion of each approach, the articular surface boundaries were marked and soft tissue was removed. On the medial condyle, an imaginary line was drawn from the most anterior (A) to the most posterior (B) point, representing the AP diameter (d3). The most posterior boundary of MPPA (C) and the most anterior boundary of DMA (D) were similarly marked. Distances between B and C (d1) and between B and D (d2) were measured as well as the anterior–posterior diameter of the condyle (d3). The same measurements were made for the lateral condyle.

Results

On the medial condyle, the average values of d1, d2, and d3 were 10.8 mm ± 3.8, 17.3 mm ± 3.3, and 60.1 mm ± 3.2, while percentages of d1/d3 and d2/d3 were 18.3% ± 6.4 and 28.7% ± 4.7. In lateral condyle, the averages for d1, d2, d3 were 6.1 mm ± 1.4, 12.1 mm ± 2.8 and 60.9 mm ± 3.3 mm and the percentages of d1/d3 and d2/d3 were 10.1% ± 2.3 and 19.9% ± 4.9.

Conclusions

When the Hoffa fragment is less than 18.3% of the AP diameter of medial condyle or 10.1% of lateral condyle, the fracture is invisible with the PPA. When the Hoffa fragment is more than 28.7% of the medial condyle or 19.9% of the lateral condyle, the PPA should be selected. If the Hoffa fragment is less than 28.7% of the medial condyle or 19.9% of the lateral condyle, the DMA or PLA with posterior-to-anterior screws is recommended. Combined approaches should be considered in some complex cases with articular comminution.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Viskontas DG, Nork SE, Barei DP, Dunbar R (2010) Technique of reduction and fixation of unicondylar medial Hoffa fracture. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:424–428 Viskontas DG, Nork SE, Barei DP, Dunbar R (2010) Technique of reduction and fixation of unicondylar medial Hoffa fracture. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:424–428
7.
go back to reference Jarit GJ, Kummer FJ, Gibber MJ, Egol KA (2006) A mechanical evaluation of two fixation methods using cancellous screws for coronal fractures of the lateral condyle of the distal femur (OTA type 33B). J Orthop Trauma 20:273–276CrossRef Jarit GJ, Kummer FJ, Gibber MJ, Egol KA (2006) A mechanical evaluation of two fixation methods using cancellous screws for coronal fractures of the lateral condyle of the distal femur (OTA type 33B). J Orthop Trauma 20:273–276CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lewis SL, Pozo JL, Muirhead-Allwood WF (1989) Coronal fractures of the lateral femoral condyle. J Bone Jt Surg Br 71:118–120CrossRef Lewis SL, Pozo JL, Muirhead-Allwood WF (1989) Coronal fractures of the lateral femoral condyle. J Bone Jt Surg Br 71:118–120CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kumar R, Malhotra R (2001) The Hoffa fracture: three case reports. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 9:47–51CrossRef Kumar R, Malhotra R (2001) The Hoffa fracture: three case reports. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 9:47–51CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lian X, Zeng Y-J (2018) Meta plate and cannulated screw fixation for treatment of type Letenneur III lateral Hoffa fracture through posterolateral approach. Zhongguo Gu Shang 31:267–271PubMed Lian X, Zeng Y-J (2018) Meta plate and cannulated screw fixation for treatment of type Letenneur III lateral Hoffa fracture through posterolateral approach. Zhongguo Gu Shang 31:267–271PubMed
19.
go back to reference Yücel İ, Degirmenci E, Özturan K (2008) Hoffa fracture: a case report. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Derg 2:37–40 Yücel İ, Degirmenci E, Özturan K (2008) Hoffa fracture: a case report. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Derg 2:37–40
23.
go back to reference Holmes SM, Bomback D, Baumgaertner MR (2004) Coronal fractures of the femoral condyle: a brief report of five cases. J Orthop Trauma 18:316–319CrossRef Holmes SM, Bomback D, Baumgaertner MR (2004) Coronal fractures of the femoral condyle: a brief report of five cases. J Orthop Trauma 18:316–319CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sahu RL, Gupta P (2014) Operative management of Hoffa fracture of the femoral condyle. Acta Med Iran 52:443–447PubMed Sahu RL, Gupta P (2014) Operative management of Hoffa fracture of the femoral condyle. Acta Med Iran 52:443–447PubMed
Metadata
Title
Relationships between Hoffa fragment size and surgical approach selection: a cadaveric study
Authors
Wich Orapiriyakul
Theerachai Apivatthakakul
Chanakarn Phornphutkul
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3022-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2018 Go to the issue