Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Relaparotomy | Research

Risk factors for relaparotomy after a cesarean delivery: a case-control study

Authors: Uri Amikam, Yael Botkovsky, Alyssa Hochberg, Aviad Cohen, Ishai Levin, Yariv Yogev, Liran Hiersch, Anat Lavie

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Relaparotomy following a cesarean delivery (CD) is an infrequent complication, with inconsistency regarding risk factors and indications for its occurrence. We therefore aimed to determine risk factors and indications for a relaparotomy following a CD at a single large tertiary center.

Methods

A retrospective case-control single-center study (2013–2023). We identified all women who had a relaparotomy up to six weeks following a CD (study group). Maternal characteristics, obstetrical and surgical data were compared to a control group in a 1:2 ratio. Controls were women with a CD before and immediately after each case in the study group, who did not undergo a relaparotomy. Included were CDs occurring after 24 gestational weeks. CD performed at different centers and indications for repeat surgery unrelated to the primary surgery (e.g., appendicitis) were excluded. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.

Results

During the study period, 131,268 women delivered at our institution. Of them, 28,280 (21.5%) had a CD, and 130 patients (0.46%) underwent a relaparotomy. Relaparotomies following a CD occurred during the first 24 h, the first week, and beyond the first week, in 59.2%, 33.1%, and 7.7% of cases, respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, relaparotomy was significantly associated with Mullerian anomalies (aOR 3.33, 95%CI 1.08–10.24, p = 0.036); uterine fibroids (aOR 3.17, 95%CI 1.11–9.05,p = 0.031); multiple pregnancy (aOR 4.1, 95%CI 1.43–11.79,p = 0.009); hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR 3.46, 95%CI 1.29–9.3,p = 0.014); CD during the second stage of labor (aOR 2.54, 95%CI 1.15–5.88, p = 0.029); complications during CD (aOR 1.62, 95%CI 1.09–3.21,p = 0.045); and excessive bleeding during CD or implementation of bleeding control measures (use of tranexamic acid, a hemostatic agent, or a surgical drain) (aOR 2.23, 95%CI 1.29–4.12,p = 0.012). Indications for relaparotomy differed depending on the time elapsed from the CD, with suspected intra-abdominal bleeding (36.1%) emerging as the primary indication within the initial 24 h.

Conclusion

We detected several pregnancy, intrapartum, and intra-operative risk factors for the need for relaparotomy following a CD. Practitioners may utilize these findings to proactively identify women at risk, thereby potentially reducing their associated morbidity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6). Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6).
2.
go back to reference Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–8.CrossRefPubMed Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP, Births. Final data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023;72(1):1–53.PubMed Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP, Births. Final data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023;72(1):1–53.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Korb D, Goffinet F, Seco A, Chevret S, Deneux-Tharaux C. Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis. CMAJ. 2019;191(13):E352–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Korb D, Goffinet F, Seco A, Chevret S, Deneux-Tharaux C. Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis. CMAJ. 2019;191(13):E352–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Ashwal E, Yogev Y, Melamed N, Khadega R, Ben-Haroush A, Wiznitzer A, et al. Characterizing the need for re-laparotomy during puerperium after cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(1):35–9.CrossRefPubMed Ashwal E, Yogev Y, Melamed N, Khadega R, Ben-Haroush A, Wiznitzer A, et al. Characterizing the need for re-laparotomy during puerperium after cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(1):35–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349–57.CrossRefPubMed Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349–57.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Weissmann-Brenner A, Barzilay E, Meyer R, Levin G, Harmatz D, Alakeli A, et al. Relaparotomy post-cesarean delivery: characteristics and risk factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(6):1427–32.CrossRefPubMed Weissmann-Brenner A, Barzilay E, Meyer R, Levin G, Harmatz D, Alakeli A, et al. Relaparotomy post-cesarean delivery: characteristics and risk factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(6):1427–32.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mik M, Magdzinska J, Dziki L, Tchorzewski M, Trzcinski R, Dziki A. Relaparotomy in colorectal cancer surgery–do any factors influence the risk of mortality? A case controlled study. Int J Surg. 2014;12(11):1192–7.CrossRefPubMed Mik M, Magdzinska J, Dziki L, Tchorzewski M, Trzcinski R, Dziki A. Relaparotomy in colorectal cancer surgery–do any factors influence the risk of mortality? A case controlled study. Int J Surg. 2014;12(11):1192–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Akkurt MO, Coşkun B, Güçlü T, Çift T, Korkmazer E. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean delivery and related maternal near-miss event due to bleeding. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(10):1695–9.CrossRefPubMed Akkurt MO, Coşkun B, Güçlü T, Çift T, Korkmazer E. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean delivery and related maternal near-miss event due to bleeding. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(10):1695–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rajaretnam N, Okoye E, Burns B. Laparotomy. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023. StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2023. Rajaretnam N, Okoye E, Burns B. Laparotomy. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023. StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2023.
11.
go back to reference Sak ME, Turgut A, Evsen MS, Soydinc HE, Ozler A, Sak S, et al. Relaparotomy after initial surgery in obstetric and gynecologic operations: analysis of 113 cases. Ginekol Pol. 2012;83(6):429–32.PubMed Sak ME, Turgut A, Evsen MS, Soydinc HE, Ozler A, Sak S, et al. Relaparotomy after initial surgery in obstetric and gynecologic operations: analysis of 113 cases. Ginekol Pol. 2012;83(6):429–32.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Peker N, Yavuz M, Aydın E, Ege S, Bademkıran MH, Karacor T. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section due to hemorrhage: a tertiary center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(3):464–70.CrossRefPubMed Peker N, Yavuz M, Aydın E, Ege S, Bademkıran MH, Karacor T. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section due to hemorrhage: a tertiary center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(3):464–70.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lurie S, Sadan O, Golan A. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134(2):184–7.CrossRefPubMed Lurie S, Sadan O, Golan A. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134(2):184–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Levin I, Rapaport AS, Salzer L, Maslovitz S, Lessing JB, Almog B. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(2):163–5.CrossRefPubMed Levin I, Rapaport AS, Salzer L, Maslovitz S, Lessing JB, Almog B. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(2):163–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kessous R, Danor D, Weintraub YA, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Ohel I, et al. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(11):2167–70.CrossRefPubMed Kessous R, Danor D, Weintraub YA, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Ohel I, et al. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(11):2167–70.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shinar S, Hareuveni M, Ben-Tal O, Many A. Relaparotomies after cesarean sections: risk factors, indications, and management. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(5):567–72.CrossRefPubMed Shinar S, Hareuveni M, Ben-Tal O, Many A. Relaparotomies after cesarean sections: risk factors, indications, and management. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(5):567–72.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Huras H, Radon-Pokracka M, Nowak M. Relaparotomy following cesarean section - a single center study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;225:185–8.CrossRefPubMed Huras H, Radon-Pokracka M, Nowak M. Relaparotomy following cesarean section - a single center study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;225:185–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ragab A, Mousbah Y, Barakat R, Zayed A, Badawy A. Re-laparotomy after caesarean deliveries: risk factors and how to avoid? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed Ragab A, Mousbah Y, Barakat R, Zayed A, Badawy A. Re-laparotomy after caesarean deliveries: risk factors and how to avoid? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Pencole L, Peyronnet V, Mandelbrot L, Lepercq J. Risk factors of relaparotomy for intra-abdominal hemorrhage after cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;260:118–23.CrossRefPubMed Pencole L, Peyronnet V, Mandelbrot L, Lepercq J. Risk factors of relaparotomy for intra-abdominal hemorrhage after cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;260:118–23.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Levitt L, Sapir H, Kabiri D, Ein-Mor E, Hochner-Celnikier D, Amsalem H. Re-laparotomy following cesarean delivery - risk factors and outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(4):607–9.CrossRefPubMed Levitt L, Sapir H, Kabiri D, Ein-Mor E, Hochner-Celnikier D, Amsalem H. Re-laparotomy following cesarean delivery - risk factors and outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(4):607–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gui J, Ling Z, Hou X, Fan Y, Xie K, Shen R. In vitro fertilization is associated with the onset and progression of preeclampsia. Placenta. 2020;89:50–7.CrossRefPubMed Gui J, Ling Z, Hou X, Fan Y, Xie K, Shen R. In vitro fertilization is associated with the onset and progression of preeclampsia. Placenta. 2020;89:50–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ganer Herman H, Farhadian Y, Shevach Alon A, Mizrachi Y, Ariel D, Raziel A, et al. Complications of the third stage of labor in in vitro fertilization pregnancies: an additional expression of abnormal placentation? Fertil Steril. 2021;115(4):1007-13. Ganer Herman H, Farhadian Y, Shevach Alon A, Mizrachi Y, Ariel D, Raziel A, et al. Complications of the third stage of labor in in vitro fertilization pregnancies: an additional expression of abnormal placentation? Fertil Steril. 2021;115(4):1007-13.
23.
go back to reference Wertheimer A, Melamed S, Ashwal E, Sapir O, Oron G, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Complications of the third stage of labor are more prevalent in IVF pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(4):663–7.CrossRefPubMed Wertheimer A, Melamed S, Ashwal E, Sapir O, Oron G, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Complications of the third stage of labor are more prevalent in IVF pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(4):663–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Nyfløt LT, Sandven I, Stray-Pedersen B, Pettersen S, Al-Zirqi I, Rosenberg M, et al. Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nyfløt LT, Sandven I, Stray-Pedersen B, Pettersen S, Al-Zirqi I, Rosenberg M, et al. Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Wang S, Wang K, Hu Q, Liao H, Wang X, Yu H. Perinatal outcomes of women with Müllerian anomalies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(4):1209–16.CrossRefPubMed Wang S, Wang K, Hu Q, Liao H, Wang X, Yu H. Perinatal outcomes of women with Müllerian anomalies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(4):1209–16.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference von Schmidt auf Altenstadt JF, Hukkelhoven CW, van Roosmalen J, Bloemenkamp KW. Pre-eclampsia increases the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e81959.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral von Schmidt auf Altenstadt JF, Hukkelhoven CW, van Roosmalen J, Bloemenkamp KW. Pre-eclampsia increases the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e81959.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Liu C-n, Yu F-b, Xu Y-z, Li J-s, Guan Z-h, Sun M-n, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of severe postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu C-n, Yu F-b, Xu Y-z, Li J-s, Guan Z-h, Sun M-n, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of severe postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Sharma SK, Philip J, Whitten CW, Padakandla UB, Landers DF. Assessment of changes in coagulation in parturients with preeclampsia using thromboelastography. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(2):385–90.CrossRefPubMed Sharma SK, Philip J, Whitten CW, Padakandla UB, Landers DF. Assessment of changes in coagulation in parturients with preeclampsia using thromboelastography. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(2):385–90.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Erez O, Othman M, Rabinovich A, Leron E, Gotsch F, Thachil J. DIC in pregnancy - pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, diagnostic scores, and treatments. J Blood Med. 2022;13:21–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Erez O, Othman M, Rabinovich A, Leron E, Gotsch F, Thachil J. DIC in pregnancy - pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, diagnostic scores, and treatments. J Blood Med. 2022;13:21–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Vitner D, Bleicher I, Levy E, Sloma R, Kadour-Peero E, Bart Y, et al. Differences in outcomes between cesarean section in the second versus the first stages of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(15):2539–42.CrossRefPubMed Vitner D, Bleicher I, Levy E, Sloma R, Kadour-Peero E, Bart Y, et al. Differences in outcomes between cesarean section in the second versus the first stages of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(15):2539–42.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Rottenstreich M, Sela HY, Shen O, Michaelson-Cohen R, Samueloff A, Reichman O. Prolonged operative time of repeat cesarean is a risk marker for post-operative maternal complications. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rottenstreich M, Sela HY, Shen O, Michaelson-Cohen R, Samueloff A, Reichman O. Prolonged operative time of repeat cesarean is a risk marker for post-operative maternal complications. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Gedikbasi A, Akyol A, Asar E, Bingol B, Uncu R, Sargin A, et al. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section: operative complications in surgical delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(5):419–25.CrossRefPubMed Gedikbasi A, Akyol A, Asar E, Bingol B, Uncu R, Sargin A, et al. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section: operative complications in surgical delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(5):419–25.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Seal SL, Kamilya G, Bhattacharyya SK, Mukherji J, Bhattacharyya AR. Relaparotomy after cesarean delivery: experience from an Indian teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2007;33(6):804–9.CrossRef Seal SL, Kamilya G, Bhattacharyya SK, Mukherji J, Bhattacharyya AR. Relaparotomy after cesarean delivery: experience from an Indian teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2007;33(6):804–9.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Amikam U, Hochberg A, Abramov S, Lavie A, Yogev Y, Hiersch L. Risk factors for maternal complications following uterine rupture: a 12-year single-center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. Amikam U, Hochberg A, Abramov S, Lavie A, Yogev Y, Hiersch L. Risk factors for maternal complications following uterine rupture: a 12-year single-center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023.
Metadata
Title
Risk factors for relaparotomy after a cesarean delivery: a case-control study
Authors
Uri Amikam
Yael Botkovsky
Alyssa Hochberg
Aviad Cohen
Ishai Levin
Yariv Yogev
Liran Hiersch
Anat Lavie
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06455-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024 Go to the issue