Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Letter to the Editor

Registered Reports: response from the Chinese PRO SIG

Authors: Daniel Y. T. Fong, Ahmed M. Y. Osman, Hongmei Wang, Chengwu Yang

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

The Quality of Life Research journal has recently caught up with the trend of publishing Registered Reports, a new publication format for reporting results from a theoretically sound and novel study that has been planned a priori and properly adhered irrespective of whether there is statistical significance [1]. The format of Registered Reports in Quality of Life Research features a two-stage review process, with stage 1 focusing on the scientific rigor and innovation, after which an “In-principle Acceptance” may be issued, and stage 2 focusing on the extent the study conduct has adhered the plan as stipulated in stage 1. Such a new publication format under the 2-stage review process was developed to alleviate the long-standing issue of p-hacking or hypothesizing after results are known (HARKing) that lead to publication bias towards positive findings [2]. The Chinese PRO SIG of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) would like to congratulate Quality of Life Research for the success of accomplishing the new initiative. It had been discussed in the SIG meeting at the 27th virtual annual ISOQOL conference in October 2020. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boehnke, J. R., & Rutherford, C. (2020). Registered Reports at “Quality of Life Research.” Quality of Life Research, 29(10), 2605–2607.CrossRef Boehnke, J. R., & Rutherford, C. (2020). Registered Reports at “Quality of Life Research.” Quality of Life Research, 29(10), 2605–2607.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Clarke, P., Buckell, J., & Barnett, A. (2020). Registered Reports: Time to radically rethink peer review in Health Economics. Pharmacoecon Open, 4(1), 1–4.CrossRef Clarke, P., Buckell, J., & Barnett, A. (2020). Registered Reports: Time to radically rethink peer review in Health Economics. Pharmacoecon Open, 4(1), 1–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference White, K. (2019). Publications output: U.S. Trends and international comparisons. National Science Foundation. White, K. (2019). Publications output: U.S. Trends and international comparisons. National Science Foundation.
4.
go back to reference King, M., Dablander, F., Jakob, L., Agan, M. L. F., Huber, F., Haslbeck, J. M. B., et al. (2016). Registered Reports for student research. Journal of European Psychology Students, 7(1), 20–23.CrossRef King, M., Dablander, F., Jakob, L., Agan, M. L. F., Huber, F., Haslbeck, J. M. B., et al. (2016). Registered Reports for student research. Journal of European Psychology Students, 7(1), 20–23.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Registered Reports: response from the Chinese PRO SIG
Authors
Daniel Y. T. Fong
Ahmed M. Y. Osman
Hongmei Wang
Chengwu Yang
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02696-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Quality of Life Research 12/2020 Go to the issue