Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

Recent trends for drug lag in clinical development of oncology drugs in Japan: does the oncology drug lag still exist in Japan?

Authors: Hideki Maeda, Tatsuo Kurokawa

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study exhaustively and historically investigated the status of drug lag for oncology drugs approved in Japan.

Methods

We comprehensively investigated oncology drugs approved in Japan between April 2001 and July 2014, using publicly available information. We also examined changes in the status of drug lag between Japan and the United States, as well as factors influencing drug lag.

Results

This study included 120 applications for approval of oncology drugs in Japan. The median difference over a 13-year period in the approval date between the United States and Japan was 875 days (29.2 months). This figure peaked in 2002, and showed a tendency to decline gradually each year thereafter. In 2014, the median approval lag was 281 days (9.4 months). Multiple regression analysis identified the following potential factors that reduce drug lag: “Japan’s participation in global clinical trials”; “bridging strategies”; “designation of priority review in Japan”; and “molecularly targeted drugs”.

Conclusions

From 2001 to 2014, molecularly targeted drugs emerged as the predominant oncology drug, and the method of development has changed from full development in Japan or bridging strategy to global simultaneous development by Japan’s taking part in global clinical trials. In line with these changes, the drug lag between the United States and Japan has significantly reduced to less than 1 year.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gunjan S (2010) Japan works to shorten drug lag boost trials of new drugs. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:148–150CrossRef Gunjan S (2010) Japan works to shorten drug lag boost trials of new drugs. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:148–150CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tsuji K, Tsutani K (2008) If Japan is to become a front-runner in pharmaceutical development, it must not only speed up its approval of new drugs, but also enhance its own research capabilities. Nature 32:851–852CrossRef Tsuji K, Tsutani K (2008) If Japan is to become a front-runner in pharmaceutical development, it must not only speed up its approval of new drugs, but also enhance its own research capabilities. Nature 32:851–852CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yonemori K, Hirakawa A, Ando M et al (2011) The notorious “drug lag” for oncology drugs in Japan. Invest New Drugs 29:706–712CrossRefPubMed Yonemori K, Hirakawa A, Ando M et al (2011) The notorious “drug lag” for oncology drugs in Japan. Invest New Drugs 29:706–712CrossRefPubMed
4.
6.
go back to reference Uyama Y, Shibata T, Nagai N et al (2005) Successful bridging strategy based on ICH E5 guideline for drugs approved in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 78:102–113CrossRefPubMed Uyama Y, Shibata T, Nagai N et al (2005) Successful bridging strategy based on ICH E5 guideline for drugs approved in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 78:102–113CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Molzon JA, Giaquinto A, Lindstrom L et al (2011) The value and benefits of the international conference on harmonization to drug regulatory authorities: advancing harmonization for better public health. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:503–512CrossRefPubMed Molzon JA, Giaquinto A, Lindstrom L et al (2011) The value and benefits of the international conference on harmonization to drug regulatory authorities: advancing harmonization for better public health. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:503–512CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Quan H, Zhao PL, Zhang J et al (2010) Sample size considerations for Japanese patients in multi-regional trial based on MHLW guidance. Pharm Stat. doi:10.1002/pst.380 (in press) Quan H, Zhao PL, Zhang J et al (2010) Sample size considerations for Japanese patients in multi-regional trial based on MHLW guidance. Pharm Stat. doi:10.​1002/​pst.​380 (in press)
11.
go back to reference Ito Y, Narimatsu H, Fukui T et al (2013) Critical review of ‘Public domain application’: a flexible drug approval system in Japan. Ann Oncol 24:1297–1305CrossRefPubMed Ito Y, Narimatsu H, Fukui T et al (2013) Critical review of ‘Public domain application’: a flexible drug approval system in Japan. Ann Oncol 24:1297–1305CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shimazawa R, Ikeda M (2012) Japanese regulatory system for approval of off-label drug use: evaluation of safety and effectiveness in literature-based applications. Clin Ther 34:2104–2106CrossRefPubMed Shimazawa R, Ikeda M (2012) Japanese regulatory system for approval of off-label drug use: evaluation of safety and effectiveness in literature-based applications. Clin Ther 34:2104–2106CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Shimura H, Masuda S, Kimura H (2014) A lesson from Japan: research and development efficiency is a key element of pharmaceutical industry consolidation process. Drug Dis Ther 8:57–63CrossRef Shimura H, Masuda S, Kimura H (2014) A lesson from Japan: research and development efficiency is a key element of pharmaceutical industry consolidation process. Drug Dis Ther 8:57–63CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hartmann M, Christine MN, Pfaff O (2013) Approval probabilities and regulatory review patterns for anticancer drugs in the European Union. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 87:112–121CrossRefPubMed Hartmann M, Christine MN, Pfaff O (2013) Approval probabilities and regulatory review patterns for anticancer drugs in the European Union. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 87:112–121CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tsuji K, Tsutani K (2010) Approval of new drugs 1999–2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations. J Clin Pharmacol Ther 35:289–301CrossRef Tsuji K, Tsutani K (2010) Approval of new drugs 1999–2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations. J Clin Pharmacol Ther 35:289–301CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maeda H, Kurokawa T (2015) Acceptance of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials supporting approval of drugs for cancer treatment by the Japanese regulatory agency. Ann Oncol 26:211–216CrossRefPubMed Maeda H, Kurokawa T (2015) Acceptance of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials supporting approval of drugs for cancer treatment by the Japanese regulatory agency. Ann Oncol 26:211–216CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Maeda H, Kurokawa T (2015) Regulatory review time for approval of oncology drugs in Japan between 2001 and, 2014. Considerations of changes, factors that affect review time, and difference with the United States. J Clin Pharmacol. doi:10.1002/jcph.458 PubMed Maeda H, Kurokawa T (2015) Regulatory review time for approval of oncology drugs in Japan between 2001 and, 2014. Considerations of changes, factors that affect review time, and difference with the United States. J Clin Pharmacol. doi:10.​1002/​jcph.​458 PubMed
18.
go back to reference Maeda H, Kurokawa T (2014) Differences in maximum tolerated doses and approval doses of molecular target oncology drug between Japan and Western countries. Invest New Drugs 32:661–669CrossRefPubMed Maeda H, Kurokawa T (2014) Differences in maximum tolerated doses and approval doses of molecular target oncology drug between Japan and Western countries. Invest New Drugs 32:661–669CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Coppinger PL, Peck CC, Temple RJ (1989) Understanding comparisons of drug introductions between the United States and the United Kingdom. Clin Pharmacol Ther 46:139–145CrossRefPubMed Coppinger PL, Peck CC, Temple RJ (1989) Understanding comparisons of drug introductions between the United States and the United Kingdom. Clin Pharmacol Ther 46:139–145CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Shimazawa R, Kusumi I, Ikeda M (2012) Delays in psychiatric development in Japan. J Clin Pharmacol Ther 37:348–351CrossRef Shimazawa R, Kusumi I, Ikeda M (2012) Delays in psychiatric development in Japan. J Clin Pharmacol Ther 37:348–351CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Asano K, Tanaka A, Sato T et al (2013) Regulatory challenges in the review data from global clinical trials: the PMDA perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther 94:195–198CrossRefPubMed Asano K, Tanaka A, Sato T et al (2013) Regulatory challenges in the review data from global clinical trials: the PMDA perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther 94:195–198CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ueno T, Asahina Y, Tanaka A et al (2014) Significant differences in drug lag in clinical development among various strategies used for regulatory submissions in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 95:533–541CrossRefPubMed Ueno T, Asahina Y, Tanaka A et al (2014) Significant differences in drug lag in clinical development among various strategies used for regulatory submissions in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 95:533–541CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Tanaka M, Nagata T (2008) Characterization of clinical data packages using foreign data in new drug applications in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 84:340–346CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M, Nagata T (2008) Characterization of clinical data packages using foreign data in new drug applications in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 84:340–346CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Boku Narikazu (2010) Current status and problems in development of molecularly targeted agents for gastrointestinal malignancy in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:183–187CrossRefPubMed Boku Narikazu (2010) Current status and problems in development of molecularly targeted agents for gastrointestinal malignancy in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:183–187CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Shoda EK, Masuda S, Kimura H (2012) Anticancer drug development from traditional cytotoxic to targeted therapies: evidence of shorter drug research and development time, and shorter drug lag in Japan. J Clin Pharmacol Ther 37:547–552CrossRef Shoda EK, Masuda S, Kimura H (2012) Anticancer drug development from traditional cytotoxic to targeted therapies: evidence of shorter drug research and development time, and shorter drug lag in Japan. J Clin Pharmacol Ther 37:547–552CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hirai Y, Kinoshita H, Kusama M et al (2010) Delays in new drug applications in Japan and industrial R&D strategies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87:212–218CrossRefPubMed Hirai Y, Kinoshita H, Kusama M et al (2010) Delays in new drug applications in Japan and industrial R&D strategies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87:212–218CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hirai Y, Yamanaka Y, Kusama M et al (2012) Analysis of the success rates of new drug development in Japan and the lag behind the US. Health Policy 104:241–246CrossRefPubMed Hirai Y, Yamanaka Y, Kusama M et al (2012) Analysis of the success rates of new drug development in Japan and the lag behind the US. Health Policy 104:241–246CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ishiguro A, Yagi S, Uyama Y (2013) Characteristics of pharmacogenomics/biomarker-guided clinical trials for regulatory approval of anti-cancer drugs in Japan. J Human Gene 58:313–316CrossRef Ishiguro A, Yagi S, Uyama Y (2013) Characteristics of pharmacogenomics/biomarker-guided clinical trials for regulatory approval of anti-cancer drugs in Japan. J Human Gene 58:313–316CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Honig PK (2014) Recent trends and success factors in reducing the lag time to approval of new drugs in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 95:467–469CrossRefPubMed Honig PK (2014) Recent trends and success factors in reducing the lag time to approval of new drugs in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 95:467–469CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Recent trends for drug lag in clinical development of oncology drugs in Japan: does the oncology drug lag still exist in Japan?
Authors
Hideki Maeda
Tatsuo Kurokawa
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0825-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine