Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 4/2014

01-08-2014 | PHASE I STUDIES

Differences in maximum tolerated doses and approval doses of molecularly targeted oncology drug between Japan and Western countries

Authors: Hideki Maeda, Tatsuo Kurokawa

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Summary

Approved doses of a number of drugs in Japan are known to be different from those in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU), and doses are often set lower for the Japanese than for the western people. Similarly, some oncology drugs also have lower dose approved for the Japanese than for the western people. A total of 40 oncology drugs were approved as new molecular entities in Japan between 2001 and 2013. Of the 40 drugs, 21 were molecularly targeted drugs and 13 were cytotoxic drugs. Five (12.5 %) of the 40 drugs had different approved dose from that in the US and the EU. Of the 13 cytotoxic drugs, four drugs (30.8 %) differed in approved dose, while all the molecularly targeted drugs (21 of 21 drugs) had the same approved dose. We compared the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the 21 molecularly targeted drugs in the Japanese with that in the western people and found that the MTD was determined lower in the Japanese than that in the western people (two drugs), was not different (10 drugs), and MTD was not determined in the Japanese and incommensurable because of the different dose range tested in Japan (nine drugs). All the molecularly targeted drugs are the same in approved doses and few molecularly targeted drugs differ in MTD between Japan and the Western countries.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malinowski HJ, Westelinck A, Sato J, Ong T (2008) Same drug, different dosing: differences in dosing for drugs approved in the United States, Europe, and Japan. J Clin Pharmacol 48:900–908CrossRefPubMed Malinowski HJ, Westelinck A, Sato J, Ong T (2008) Same drug, different dosing: differences in dosing for drugs approved in the United States, Europe, and Japan. J Clin Pharmacol 48:900–908CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fukunaga S, Kusama M, Arnold FL, Ono S (2011) Ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics in new drug applications and approved doses in Japan. J Clin Pharmacol 51:1237–1240CrossRefPubMed Fukunaga S, Kusama M, Arnold FL, Ono S (2011) Ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics in new drug applications and approved doses in Japan. J Clin Pharmacol 51:1237–1240CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Arnold FL, Kusama M, Ono S (2010) Exploring differences in drug doses between Japan and Western countries. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87(6):714–720CrossRefPubMed Arnold FL, Kusama M, Ono S (2010) Exploring differences in drug doses between Japan and Western countries. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87(6):714–720CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nakashima K, Narukawa M, Takeuchi M (2011) Approaches to Japanese dose evaluation in global drug development: factors that generate different dosage between Japan and the United States. Clin Pharmacol Ther 90(6):836–843CrossRefPubMed Nakashima K, Narukawa M, Takeuchi M (2011) Approaches to Japanese dose evaluation in global drug development: factors that generate different dosage between Japan and the United States. Clin Pharmacol Ther 90(6):836–843CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hyodo I, Shirao K, Doi T, Hatake K, Arai Y, Yamaguchi K et al (2006) A phase II study of the global dose and schedule of capecitabine in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 36(7):410–417CrossRefPubMed Hyodo I, Shirao K, Doi T, Hatake K, Arai Y, Yamaguchi K et al (2006) A phase II study of the global dose and schedule of capecitabine in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 36(7):410–417CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sai K, Sawada J, Minami H (2008) Irinotecan pharmacogenetics in Japanese cancer patients: role of UGT1A1 6 and 28. Yakugaku Zasshi 128(4):575–584CrossRefPubMed Sai K, Sawada J, Minami H (2008) Irinotecan pharmacogenetics in Japanese cancer patients: role of UGT1A1 6 and 28. Yakugaku Zasshi 128(4):575–584CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kudoh S, Takeda K, Nakagawa K, Takada M et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the west Japan thoracic oncology group trial (WJTOG 9904). J Clin Oncol 24:3657–3663CrossRefPubMed Kudoh S, Takeda K, Nakagawa K, Takada M et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the west Japan thoracic oncology group trial (WJTOG 9904). J Clin Oncol 24:3657–3663CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Murakami H, Shimizu K, Sawamura M, Suzuki K et al (2009) Phase II study and pharmacokinetic study of thalidomide in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Int J Hematol 89(5):636–641CrossRefPubMed Murakami H, Shimizu K, Sawamura M, Suzuki K et al (2009) Phase II study and pharmacokinetic study of thalidomide in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Int J Hematol 89(5):636–641CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D et al (1999) Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 341:1565–1571CrossRefPubMed Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D et al (1999) Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 341:1565–1571CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Usami M, Akaza H, Arai Y, Hirano Y, Kagawa S et al (2007) Bicalutamide 80mg combined with a luteinizing hormone relieasing hormone agonist (LHRH-A) versus LHRH-A monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer findings from a phase III randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in Japanese patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10(2):194–201CrossRefPubMed Usami M, Akaza H, Arai Y, Hirano Y, Kagawa S et al (2007) Bicalutamide 80mg combined with a luteinizing hormone relieasing hormone agonist (LHRH-A) versus LHRH-A monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer findings from a phase III randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in Japanese patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10(2):194–201CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Akaza H, Yamaguchi A, Matsuda T, Igawa M et al (2004) Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80mg in combination with luteinizing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized study in Japanese patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34(1):20–28CrossRefPubMed Akaza H, Yamaguchi A, Matsuda T, Igawa M et al (2004) Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80mg in combination with luteinizing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized study in Japanese patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34(1):20–28CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McLeod DG, Iversen P, See WA, Morris T et al (2006) Bicalutamide 150 mg plus standard care alone for early prostate cancer. BJU Int 97(2):247–254CrossRefPubMed McLeod DG, Iversen P, See WA, Morris T et al (2006) Bicalutamide 150 mg plus standard care alone for early prostate cancer. BJU Int 97(2):247–254CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ichimaru K, Toyoshima S, Uyama T (2010) Effective global development strategy for obtaining regulatory approval in the context of ethnicity-related drug response factors. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87(3):362–366CrossRefPubMed Ichimaru K, Toyoshima S, Uyama T (2010) Effective global development strategy for obtaining regulatory approval in the context of ethnicity-related drug response factors. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87(3):362–366CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Merenda C (2012) Racial/ethnic composition of study participants in FDA-approved oncology new molecular entities, 2006–2008. J Natl Med Assoc 104(9–10):430–435PubMed Merenda C (2012) Racial/ethnic composition of study participants in FDA-approved oncology new molecular entities, 2006–2008. J Natl Med Assoc 104(9–10):430–435PubMed
15.
go back to reference Salzberg M (2012) First-in-human phase 1 studies in oncology: the new challenge for investigative sites. Rambam Maimoinides Med J 3(2):e0007 Salzberg M (2012) First-in-human phase 1 studies in oncology: the new challenge for investigative sites. Rambam Maimoinides Med J 3(2):e0007
16.
go back to reference Sinha G (2010) Japan works to shorten “Drug Lag”, boost trials of new drugs. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(3):148–151CrossRefPubMed Sinha G (2010) Japan works to shorten “Drug Lag”, boost trials of new drugs. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(3):148–151CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Asano K, Tanaka A, Sato T, Uyama T (2013) Regulatory challenges in the review of data from global clinical trials: the PMDA prerspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther 94(2):195–198CrossRefPubMed Asano K, Tanaka A, Sato T, Uyama T (2013) Regulatory challenges in the review of data from global clinical trials: the PMDA prerspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther 94(2):195–198CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Molzon JA, Giaquinto A, Lindstrom L, Tominaga T et al (2011) The value and benefit of the international conference on harmonization to drug regulatory authorities: advancing harmonization for better public health. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(4):503–512CrossRefPubMed Molzon JA, Giaquinto A, Lindstrom L, Tominaga T et al (2011) The value and benefit of the international conference on harmonization to drug regulatory authorities: advancing harmonization for better public health. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(4):503–512CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Glickman SW, McHutchison JG, Peterson ED, Cairns CB et al (2009) Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. NEJM 360(8):816–823CrossRefPubMed Glickman SW, McHutchison JG, Peterson ED, Cairns CB et al (2009) Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. NEJM 360(8):816–823CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Forster MD, Saijo N, Seymour L, Calvert H (2010) Performing phase I clinical trials of anticancer agents: perspectives from within the European Union and Japan. Clin Cancer Res 16(6):1737–1744CrossRefPubMed Forster MD, Saijo N, Seymour L, Calvert H (2010) Performing phase I clinical trials of anticancer agents: perspectives from within the European Union and Japan. Clin Cancer Res 16(6):1737–1744CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Differences in maximum tolerated doses and approval doses of molecularly targeted oncology drug between Japan and Western countries
Authors
Hideki Maeda
Tatsuo Kurokawa
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0080-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Investigational New Drugs 4/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine