Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-06-2015 | Research article

Re-inventing care planning in mental health: stakeholder accounts of the imagined implementation of a user/carer involved intervention

Authors: Helen Brooks, Caroline Sanders, Karina Lovell, Claire Fraser, Anne Rogers

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite an increase in mental health innovations designed to increase service user and carer involvement in services, there is evidence that service users and carers are still relatively marginalised. This study aimed to identify key informants operating with knowledge of both policy and practice related to future models of mental health management in order to explore the potential de-implementation of existing care planning and possibilities for the introduction of a training programme designed to implement a new user and carer involved and focussed process of mental health care planning.

Methods

13 semi-structured interviews were carried out with key informants from a range of relevant disciplinary backgrounds and professional roles, who were involved locally and nationally in policy, practice and research. The aim of the interviews was to explore their perspectives on contemporary arrangements for care planning procedures and processes and to identify factors that might promote or inhibit the routine incorporation of user/carer led planning. Findings were compared to data derived from service users, carers and professionals to illuminate added value.

Results

Key stakeholders identified elements of the current care planning context that were likely to impact on the implementability of user - focussed care planning. Like other stakeholders, key informants felt that the proposed intervention coalesced with the increasing normalisation of user involvement as appropriate and desirable. Participants added to existing data by illuminating the need for organisational bureaucracy and the legacy of prior mental health policy and historical practice to be considered in implementation. Adequate relationships within the system were considered by all stakeholders to be crucial to successful implementation and key informants discussed how this could be eroded through attempts at practice standardisation and current connectivity and culture within services.

Conclusions

The study demonstrated the value of incorporating the perspective of stakeholders not directly involved in service delivery in implementation research designed to inform an intervention at the point of design. Their contribution centred on the identification of factors that appeared not be obvious to those working in the system or emanated from political and policy arenas as well as developing the contextual understanding of themes raised by other stakeholders.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brooks H, Pilgrim D, Rogers A. Innovation in mental health services: what are the key components of success? Imp Sci. 2011;6:120.CrossRef Brooks H, Pilgrim D, Rogers A. Innovation in mental health services: what are the key components of success? Imp Sci. 2011;6:120.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vilela Chaves C, Moro S. Mental health system development profiles and indicators of scientific and technology innovation. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009;12(2):67–78.PubMed Vilela Chaves C, Moro S. Mental health system development profiles and indicators of scientific and technology innovation. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009;12(2):67–78.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(1):24–34.CrossRefPubMed Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(1):24–34.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Care Quality Commission. Survey of mental health inpatient services. London: Care Quality Commission; 2009. Care Quality Commission. Survey of mental health inpatient services. London: Care Quality Commission; 2009.
5.
go back to reference Healthcare Commission. Community mental health service users survey. London: Healthcare commission; 2008. Healthcare Commission. Community mental health service users survey. London: Healthcare commission; 2008.
6.
go back to reference Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: DH; 2009. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: DH; 2009.
7.
go back to reference Royal College of Physicians. Advance care planning. In: Turner-Stokes L, Higgins B, editors. Concise guidance to good practice. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2009. Royal College of Physicians. Advance care planning. In: Turner-Stokes L, Higgins B, editors. Concise guidance to good practice. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2009.
8.
go back to reference Crawford M, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325:1263–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Crawford M, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325:1263–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bee P, Playle J, Lovell K, Barnes P, Gray R, Keeley P. Service user views and expectations of UK-registered mental health nurses: A systematic review of empirical research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:442–57.CrossRefPubMed Bee P, Playle J, Lovell K, Barnes P, Gray R, Keeley P. Service user views and expectations of UK-registered mental health nurses: A systematic review of empirical research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:442–57.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bee P, Brooks H, Fraser C and Lovell K. Service user and carer involvement in mental health care planning: a qualitative exploration of the professional perspective. Int J Nurs Stud. In press. Bee P, Brooks H, Fraser C and Lovell K. Service user and carer involvement in mental health care planning: a qualitative exploration of the professional perspective. Int J Nurs Stud. In press.
11.
go back to reference Cree L, Brooks H, Berzins K, Fraser C, Lovell K, Bee P. Carers’ experiences of involvement in care planning: a qualitative exploration of the facilitators and barriers to engagement with mental health services. BMC Psych. 2015;15:208.CrossRef Cree L, Brooks H, Berzins K, Fraser C, Lovell K, Bee P. Carers’ experiences of involvement in care planning: a qualitative exploration of the facilitators and barriers to engagement with mental health services. BMC Psych. 2015;15:208.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grundy A, Bee P, Meade O, Callaghan P, Beatty S, Olleveant N, et al. Bringing meaning to user involvement in mental health care-planning: a qualitative exploration of service user perspectives. J Psychiatr Ment Hlt. In press. Grundy A, Bee P, Meade O, Callaghan P, Beatty S, Olleveant N, et al. Bringing meaning to user involvement in mental health care-planning: a qualitative exploration of service user perspectives. J Psychiatr Ment Hlt. In press.
13.
go back to reference Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):63.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):63.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Coupe N, Anderson E, Gask L, Sykes P, Richards DA, Chew-Graham C. Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:78.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Coupe N, Anderson E, Gask L, Sykes P, Richards DA, Chew-Graham C. Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:78.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference May CR, Mair FS, Dowrick CF, Finch TL. Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:42.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed May CR, Mair FS, Dowrick CF, Finch TL. Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:42.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kennedy A, Rogers A, Chew-Graham C, Blakeman T, Bowen A, Gardner C, et al. Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients. Implement Sci. 2014;9:129.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kennedy A, Rogers A, Chew-Graham C, Blakeman T, Bowen A, Gardner C, et al. Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients. Implement Sci. 2014;9:129.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Blickem C, Kennedy A, Jariwala P, Morris R, Bowen R, Vassilev I, et al. Aligning everyday life priorities with people’s self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:262.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Blickem C, Kennedy A, Jariwala P, Morris R, Bowen R, Vassilev I, et al. Aligning everyday life priorities with people’s self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:262.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Macfarlane A, O’Reilly-de BM. Using a theory-driven conceptual framework in qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(5):607–18.CrossRefPubMed Macfarlane A, O’Reilly-de BM. Using a theory-driven conceptual framework in qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(5):607–18.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rogers A, Vassilev I, Purmar M, Todorova E, Portillo MC, Foss C, et al. Meso level influences on long term condition self-management: stakeholder accounts of commonalities and differences across six European countries. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:622.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Rogers A, Vassilev I, Purmar M, Todorova E, Portillo MC, Foss C, et al. Meso level influences on long term condition self-management: stakeholder accounts of commonalities and differences across six European countries. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:622.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Linton JD. Implementation research: state of the art and directions. Technovation. 2002;22(2):65–79.CrossRef Linton JD. Implementation research: state of the art and directions. Technovation. 2002;22(2):65–79.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Davies B, Higuchi K, Gifford W, Bajmok I, et al. Spreading and sustaining best practices for home care of older adults: a grounded theory study. Implement Sci. 2014;9:162.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Davies B, Higuchi K, Gifford W, Bajmok I, et al. Spreading and sustaining best practices for home care of older adults: a grounded theory study. Implement Sci. 2014;9:162.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gilburt H, Slade M, Bird V, Oduola S, Craig TKJ. Promoting recovery-oriented practice in mental health services: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:167.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gilburt H, Slade M, Bird V, Oduola S, Craig TKJ. Promoting recovery-oriented practice in mental health services: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:167.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Gilburt H, Rose D, Slade M. The importance of relationships in mental health care: a qualitative study of service users’ experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:92.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gilburt H, Rose D, Slade M. The importance of relationships in mental health care: a qualitative study of service users’ experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:92.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lelliott P, Bennett H, McGeorge M, Turner T. Accreditation of acute in-patient mental health services. Psychiatr Bull. 2006;30:361–3.CrossRef Lelliott P, Bennett H, McGeorge M, Turner T. Accreditation of acute in-patient mental health services. Psychiatr Bull. 2006;30:361–3.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bee P, Price O, Baker J, Lovell K. Looking beyond the rhetoric – A systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to user-led care planning. B J Psych. 2015;207(2):104–14.CrossRef Bee P, Price O, Baker J, Lovell K. Looking beyond the rhetoric – A systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to user-led care planning. B J Psych. 2015;207(2):104–14.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Re-inventing care planning in mental health: stakeholder accounts of the imagined implementation of a user/carer involved intervention
Authors
Helen Brooks
Caroline Sanders
Karina Lovell
Claire Fraser
Anne Rogers
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1154-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue