Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2/2022

26-01-2021 | Rapid Sequence Induction | Original Research

Assessment of the 50 % and 95 % effective paratracheal forces for occluding the esophagus in anesthetized patients

Authors: Hyerim Kim, Shuvra Mondal, Choon-Gi Choi, Jin-Young Hwang

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the 50% and 95% effective paratracheal forces for occluding the esophagus in anesthetized patients. In 46 anesthetized patients, the upper esophagus was examined using ultrasonography, and the lower paratracheal area over the esophagus just above the clavicle was marked. Manual paratracheal force was applied over that area using a novel pressure sensing device set-up. In the first patient, a 20 N paratracheal force was applied, and the patency of the esophagus was assessed by advancing the esophageal stethoscope. Unsuccessful advancement of the esophageal stethoscope was considered an effective paratracheal force. If advancement of the esophageal stethoscope was successful, the paratracheal force was increased by 2 N for the next patient, and if it was unsuccessful, the force was decreased by 2 N for the next patient. These sequential tests were performed using 12- and 18-Fr esophageal stethoscopes, respectively. According to Dixon and Mood method, the 50% effective paratracheal force (confidence interval) was 18.4 (17.5‒19.3) N with the use of a 12-Fr esophageal stethoscope and 12.8 (11.0‒14.6) N with the use of an 18-Fr esophageal stethoscope. Using probit regression analysis, the 50% and 95% effective paratracheal forces were 18.4 (16.8‒19.6) N and 20.6 (19.4‒27.9) N, respectively, with the use of a 12-Fr esophageal stethoscope, and 12.4 (8.3‒14.4) N and 16.9 (14.7‒37.3) N, respectively, with the use of an 18-Fr esophageal stethoscope. Our findings suggest a guide for applying paratracheal force during rapid sequence induction and tracheal intubation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Salem MR, Khorasani A, Zeidan A, Crystal GJ. Cricoid pressure controversies: narrative review. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:738–52.CrossRef Salem MR, Khorasani A, Zeidan A, Crystal GJ. Cricoid pressure controversies: narrative review. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:738–52.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sellick BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia. Lancet. 1961;2:404–6.CrossRef Sellick BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia. Lancet. 1961;2:404–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith KJ, Ladak S, Choi PT, Dobranowski J. The cricoid cartilage and the esophagus are not aligned in close to half of adult patients. Can J Anesth. 2002;49:503–7.CrossRef Smith KJ, Ladak S, Choi PT, Dobranowski J. The cricoid cartilage and the esophagus are not aligned in close to half of adult patients. Can J Anesth. 2002;49:503–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Smith KJ, Dobranowski J, Yip G, Dauphin A, Choi PT. Cricoid pressure displaces the esophagus: an observational study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:60–4.CrossRef Smith KJ, Dobranowski J, Yip G, Dauphin A, Choi PT. Cricoid pressure displaces the esophagus: an observational study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:60–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rice MJ, Mancuso AA, Gibbs C, Morey TE, Gravenstein N, Deitte LA. Cricoid pressure results in compression of the postcricoid hypopharynx: the esophageal position is irrelevant. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1546–52.CrossRef Rice MJ, Mancuso AA, Gibbs C, Morey TE, Gravenstein N, Deitte LA. Cricoid pressure results in compression of the postcricoid hypopharynx: the esophageal position is irrelevant. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1546–52.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zeidan AM, Salem MR, Mazoit JX, Abdullah MA, Ghattas T, Crystal GJ. The effectiveness of cricoid pressure for occluding the esophageal entrance in anesthetized and paralyzed patients: an experimental and observational glidescope study. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:580–6.CrossRef Zeidan AM, Salem MR, Mazoit JX, Abdullah MA, Ghattas T, Crystal GJ. The effectiveness of cricoid pressure for occluding the esophageal entrance in anesthetized and paralyzed patients: an experimental and observational glidescope study. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:580–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zhu SY, Liu RC, Chen LH, Yang H, Feng X, Liao XH. Sonographic anatomy of the cervical esophagus. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32:163–71.CrossRef Zhu SY, Liu RC, Chen LH, Yang H, Feng X, Liao XH. Sonographic anatomy of the cervical esophagus. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32:163–71.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gautier N, Danklou J, Brichant JF, Lopez AM, Vandepitte C, Kuroda MM, et al. The effect of force applied to the left paratracheal oesophagus on air entry into the gastric antrum during positive-pressure ventilation using a facemask. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:22–8.CrossRef Gautier N, Danklou J, Brichant JF, Lopez AM, Vandepitte C, Kuroda MM, et al. The effect of force applied to the left paratracheal oesophagus on air entry into the gastric antrum during positive-pressure ventilation using a facemask. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:22–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dixon WJ, Mood AM. A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1948;43:109–26.CrossRef Dixon WJ, Mood AM. A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1948;43:109–26.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:144–52.CrossRef Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:144–52.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Paul M, Fisher DM. Are estimates of MAC reliable? Anesthesiology. 2001;95:1362–70.CrossRef Paul M, Fisher DM. Are estimates of MAC reliable? Anesthesiology. 2001;95:1362–70.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Noguchi K, Marmolejo-Ramos F. Assessing equality of means using the overlap of range-preserving confidence intervals. Am Stat. 2016;70:325–34.CrossRef Noguchi K, Marmolejo-Ramos F. Assessing equality of means using the overlap of range-preserving confidence intervals. Am Stat. 2016;70:325–34.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Andruszkiewicz P, Wojtczak J, Wroblewski L, Kaczor M, Sobczyk D, Kowalik I. Ultrasound evaluation of the impact of cricoid pressure versus novel “paralaryngeal pressure” on anteroposterior oesophageal diameter. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:1024–9.CrossRef Andruszkiewicz P, Wojtczak J, Wroblewski L, Kaczor M, Sobczyk D, Kowalik I. Ultrasound evaluation of the impact of cricoid pressure versus novel “paralaryngeal pressure” on anteroposterior oesophageal diameter. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:1024–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vanner RG, Pryle BJ. Regurgitation and oesophageal rupture with cricoid pressure: a cadaver study. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:732–5.CrossRef Vanner RG, Pryle BJ. Regurgitation and oesophageal rupture with cricoid pressure: a cadaver study. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:732–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hartsilver EL, Vanner RG, Bewley J, Clayton T. Gastric pressure during emergency caesarean section under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:752–4.CrossRef Hartsilver EL, Vanner RG, Bewley J, Clayton T. Gastric pressure during emergency caesarean section under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:752–4.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zeidan AM, Salem MR, Bamadhaj M, Mazoit J-X, Sadek H, Houjairy H, et al. The cricoid force necessary to occlude the esophageal entrance: is there a gender difference? Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1168–73.CrossRef Zeidan AM, Salem MR, Bamadhaj M, Mazoit J-X, Sadek H, Houjairy H, et al. The cricoid force necessary to occlude the esophageal entrance: is there a gender difference? Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1168–73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of the 50 % and 95 % effective paratracheal forces for occluding the esophagus in anesthetized patients
Authors
Hyerim Kim
Shuvra Mondal
Choon-Gi Choi
Jin-Young Hwang
Publication date
26-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00652-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2/2022 Go to the issue