Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016

01-04-2016

Rapid growth in surgeons’ use of secure messaging in a patient portal

Authors: Jared A. Shenson, Robert M. Cronin, Sharon E. Davis, Qingxia Chen, Gretchen Purcell Jackson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Use of secure messaging through patient portals has risen substantially in recent years due to provider incentives and consumer demand. Secure messaging may increase patient satisfaction and improve outcomes, but also adds to physician workload. Most prior studies of secure messaging focused on primary care and medical specialties. We examined surgeons’ use of secure messaging and the contribution of messaging to outpatient interactions in a broadly deployed patient portal.

Methods

We determined the number of clinic visits and secure messages for surgical providers in the first 3 years (2008–2010) after patient portal deployment at an academic medical center. We calculated the proportion of outpatient interaction conducted through messaging for each specialty. Logistic regression models compared the likelihood of message-based versus clinic outpatient interaction across surgical specialties.

Results

Over the study period, surgical providers delivered care in 648,200 clinic visits and received 83,912 messages, with more than 200 % growth in monthly message volume. Surgical specialties receiving the most messages were orthopedics/podiatry (25.1 %), otolaryngology (20.1 %), urology (10.8 %), and general surgery (9.6 %); vascular surgery (0.8 %) and pediatric general surgery (0.2 %) received the fewest. The proportion of outpatient interactions conducted through secure messaging increased significantly from 5.4 % in 2008 to 15.3 % in 2010 (p < 0.001) with all specialties experiencing growth. Heart/lung transplantation (74.9 %), liver/kidney/pancreas transplantation (69.5 %), and general surgery (48.7 %) had the highest proportion of message-based outpatient interaction by the end of the study.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates rapid adoption of online secure messaging across surgical specialties with significant growth in its use for outpatient interaction. Some specialties, particularly those with long-term follow-up, interacted with patients more through secure messaging than in person. As surgeons devote more time to secure messaging, additional research will be needed to understand the care delivered through online interactions and to develop models for reimbursement.
Literature
1.
2.
Osborn CY, Rosenbloom ST, Stenner SP, Anders S, Muse S, Johnson KB, Jirjis J, Jackson GP (2011) MyHealthAtVanderbilt: policies and procedures governing patient portal functionality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18(Suppl 1):i18–i23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Haun JN, Lind JD, Shimada SL, Martin TL, Gosline RM, Antinori N, Stewart M, Simon SR (2014) Evaluating user experiences of the secure messaging tool on the Veterans Affairs’ patient portal system. J Med Internet Res 16(3):e75CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zickmund SL, Hess R, Bryce CL, McTigue K, Olshansky E, Fitzgerald K, Fischer GS (2008) Interest in the use of computerized patient portals: role of the provider-patient relationship. J Gen Int Med 23(Suppl 1):20–26CrossRef
5.
Bishop TF, Press MJ, Mendelsohn JL, Casalino LP (2013) Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Aff 32(8):1361–1367CrossRef
6.
Kleiner KD, Akers R, Burke BL, Werner EJ (2002) Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communication in pediatric practices. Pediatrics 109(5):740–744CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
9.
Anand SG, Feldman MJ, Geller DS, Bisbee A, Bauchner H (2005) A content analysis of e-mail communication between primary care providers and parents. Pediatrics 115(5):1283–1288CrossRefPubMed
10.
Liederman EM, Lee JC, Baquero VH, Seites PG (2005) Patient-physician web messaging. The impact on message volume and satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med 20(1):52–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Lin C-T, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, Beaty BL, Ross SE (2005) An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 7(4):e47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Stalberg P, Yeh M, Ketteridge G, Delbridge H, Delbridge L (2008) E-mail access and improved communication between patient and surgeon. Arch Surg 143(2):164–168CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington
15.
White C, Moyer C, Stern D, Katz S (2004) A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11(4):260–267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Stiles R, Deppen S, Figaro M, Gregg W (2007) Behind-the-scenes of patient-centered care: content analysis of electronic messaging among primary care clinic providers and staff. Med Care 45(12):1205–1209CrossRefPubMed
17.
Wallwiener M, Wallwiener CW, Kansy JK, Seeger H, Rajab TK (2009) Impact of electronic messaging on the patient-physician interaction. J Telemed Telecare 15(5):243–250CrossRefPubMed
18.
Roter DL, Larson S, Sands DZ, Ford DE, Houston T (2008) Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered? Health Commun 23(1):80–86CrossRefPubMed
19.
Nazi KM (2013) The personal health record paradox: health care professionals’ perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings. J Med Internet Res 15(4):e70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zhou YY, Kanter MH, Wang JJ, Garrido T (2010) Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e-mail between physicians and patients. Health Aff 29(7):1370–1375CrossRef
21.
Biermann JS, Golladay GJ, Peterson RN (2006) Using the internet to enhance physician-patient communication. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14(3):136–144CrossRefPubMed
22.
McGeady D, Kujala J, Ilvonen K (2008) The impact of patient-physician web messaging on healthcare service provision. Int J Med Inform 77(1):17–23CrossRefPubMed
23.
Blumenthal D, Tavenner M (2010) The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 363(6):501–504CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Crotty BH, Tamrat Y, Mostaghimi A, Safran C, Landon BE (2014) Patient-to-physician messaging: volume nearly tripled as more patients joined system, but per capita rate plateaued. Health Aff 33(10):1817–1822CrossRef
26.
Harrell FJ, Dupont M, Hmsic D (2007) The design package. Available at: http://​ftp.​uni-bayreuth.​de/​math/​statlib/​R/​CRAN/​doc/​packages/​Design.​pdf.​ Accessed 10 Dec 2014
27.
Byrne JM, Elliott S, Firek A (2009) Initial experience with patient-clinician secure messaging at a VA medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16(2):267–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Gaster B, Knight C, DeWitt D, Sheffield J, Assefi N, Buchwald D (2003) Physicians’ use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication. J Gen Intern Med 18(5):385–389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Wakefield DS, Mehr D, Keplinger L, Canfield S, Gopidi R, Wakefield BJ, Koopman RJ, Belden JL, Kruse R, Kochendorfer KM (2010) Issues and questions to consider in implementing secure electronic patient-provider web portal communications systems. Int J Med Inform 79(7):469–477CrossRefPubMed
30.
Wade-Vuturo AE, Mayberry LS, Osborn CY (2013) Secure messaging and diabetes management: experiences and perspectives of patient portal users. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20(3):519–525CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Couchman GR, Forjuoh SN, Rascoe TG, Reis MD, Koehler B, Van Walsum KL (2005) E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients’ expectations for specific test results? Int J Med Inform 74(1):21–30CrossRefPubMed
32.
Houston TK, Sands DZ, Jenckes MW, Ford DE (2004) Experiences of patients who were early adopters of electronic communication with their physician: satisfaction, benefits, and concerns. Am J Manag Care 10(9):601–608PubMed
33.
McGillicuddy JW, Weiland AK, Frenzel RM, Mueller M, Brunner-Jackson BM, Taber DJ, Baliga PK, Treiber FA (2013) Patient attitudes toward mobile phone-based health monitoring: questionnaire study among kidney transplant recipients. J Med Internet Res 15(1):e6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zhou YY, Garrido T, Chin HL, Wiesenthal AM, Liang LL (2007) Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. Am J Manag Care 13(7):418–424PubMed
35.
Bergmo TS, Kummervold PE, Gammon D, Dahl LB (2005) Electronic patient-provider communication: will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care? Int J Med Inform 74(9):705–710CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
Miller DC, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer N, Skinner J, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Large variations in Medicare payments for surgery highlight savings potential from bundled payment programs. Health Aff 30(11):2107–2115CrossRef
38.
Edmiston CEJ, Krepel CJ, Edmiston SE, Spencer M, Lee C, Brown KR, Lewis BD, Rossi PJ, Malinowski M, Seabrook G (2014) Empowering the surgical patient: a randomized, prospective analysis of an innovative strategy for improving patient compliance with preadmission showering protocol. J Am Coll Surg 219(2):256–264CrossRefPubMed
39.
Tang PC, Black W, Young CY (2006) Proposed criteria for reimbursing eVisits: content analysis of secure patient messages in a personal health record system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:764–768PubMedCentral
40.
41.
Cronin RM, Davis SE, Shenson JA, Chen Q, Rosenbloom ST, Jackson GP (2015) Growth of secure messaging through a patient portal as a form of outpatient interaction across clinical specialties. Appl Clin Inf 6(2):288–304CrossRef
42.
Wade-Vuturo AE, Mayberry LS, Osborn CY (2013) Secure messaging and diabetes management: experiences and perspectives of patient portal users. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20(3):519–525CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Rapid growth in surgeons’ use of secure messaging in a patient portal
Authors
Jared A. Shenson
Robert M. Cronin
Sharon E. Davis
Qingxia Chen
Gretchen Purcell Jackson
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4347-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Delineation of factors associated with prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair leads to a clinical pathway and improves quality of care

OriginalPaper

Prior treatment does not influence the performance or early outcome of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia

OriginalPaper

Long-term functional outcomes of laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

OriginalPaper

EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts offers similar success and complications compared to surgical treatment but with a lower cost

OriginalPaper

Application of carbon nanoparticles to mark locations for re-inspection after colonic polypectomy

OriginalPaper

Does the hands-on, technical training of residents in colonoscopy affect quality outcomes?