Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2018

01-10-2018 | Breast Oncology

Randomized Trial Comparing Resection of Primary Tumor with No Surgery in Stage IV Breast Cancer at Presentation: Protocol MF07-01

Authors: Atilla Soran, MD, MPH, FNCBC, FACS, Vahit Ozmen, MD, FACS, Serdar Ozbas, MD, Hasan Karanlik, MD, Mahmut Muslumanoglu, MD, Abdullah Igci, MD, Zafer Canturk, MD, Zafer Utkan, MD, Cihangir Ozaslan, MD, Turkkan Evrensel, MD, Cihan Uras, MD, Erol Aksaz, MD, Aykut Soyder, MD, Umit Ugurlu, MD, Cavit Col, MD, Neslihan Cabioglu, MD, Betül Bozkurt, MD, Ali Uzunkoy, MD, Neset Koksal, MD, Bahadir M. Gulluoglu, MD, FACS, Bulent Unal, MD, Can Atalay, MD, Emin Yıldırım, MD, Ergun Erdem, MD, Semra Salimoglu, MD, Atakan Sezer, MD, Ayhan Koyuncu, MD, Gunay Gurleyik, MD, Haluk Alagol, MD, Nalan Ulufi, MD, Uğur Berberoglu, MD, Mustafa Dulger, MD, Omer Cengiz, MD, Efe Sezgin, PhD, Ronald Johnson, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The MF07-01 trial is a multicenter, phase III, randomized, controlled study comparing locoregional treatment (LRT) followed by systemic therapy (ST) with ST alone for treatment-naïve stage IV breast cancer (BC) patients.

Methods

At initial diagnosis, patients were randomized 1:1 to either the LRT or ST group. All the patients were given ST either immediately after randomization or after surgical resection of the intact primary tumor.

Results

The trial enrolled 274 patients: 138 in the LRT group and 136 in the ST group. Hazard of death was 34% lower in the LRT group than in the ST group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49–0.88; p = 0.005). Unplanned subgroup analyses showed that the risk of death was statistically lower in the LRT group than in the ST group with respect to estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)(+) (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.46–0.91; p = 0.01), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)/neu(–) (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45–0.91; p = 0.01), patients younger than 55 years (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38–0.86; p = 0.007), and patients with solitary bone-only metastases (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23–0.98; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

In the current trial, improvement in 36-month survival was not observed with upfront surgery for stage IV breast cancer patients. However, a longer follow-up study (median, 40 months) showed statistically significant improvement in median survival. When locoregional treatment in de novo stage IV BC is discussed with the patient as an option, practitioners must consider age, performance status, comorbidities, tumor type, and metastatic disease burden.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carmichael AR, Anderson EDC, Chetty U, Dixon JM. Does local surgery have a role in the management of stage IV breast cancer? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:17–9.CrossRef Carmichael AR, Anderson EDC, Chetty U, Dixon JM. Does local surgery have a role in the management of stage IV breast cancer? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:17–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gnerlich J, Jeffe DB, Deshpande AD, Beers C, Zander C, Margenthaler JA. Surgical removal of the primary tumor increases overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of the 1988–2003 SEER data. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2187–94.CrossRef Gnerlich J, Jeffe DB, Deshpande AD, Beers C, Zander C, Margenthaler JA. Surgical removal of the primary tumor increases overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of the 1988–2003 SEER data. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2187–94.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Blanchard DK, Bhatia P, Hilsenbeck SG, Elledge RM. Does surgical management of stage IV breast cancer affect outcome?. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006; 2006(Suppl 1):100:18 Blanchard DK, Bhatia P, Hilsenbeck SG, Elledge RM. Does surgical management of stage IV breast cancer affect outcome?. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006; 2006(Suppl 1):100:18
4.
5.
go back to reference Giordano SH, Buzdar AU, Smith TL, et al. Is breast cancer survival improving? Cancer. 2004;100:44–52.CrossRef Giordano SH, Buzdar AU, Smith TL, et al. Is breast cancer survival improving? Cancer. 2004;100:44–52.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Andre F, Slimane K, Bachelot T, et al. Breast cancer with synchronous metastases: trends in survival during a 14-year period. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3302–8.CrossRef Andre F, Slimane K, Bachelot T, et al. Breast cancer with synchronous metastases: trends in survival during a 14-year period. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3302–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Essner R, Lee JH, Wanek LA, et al. Contemporary surgical treatment of advanced-stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 2004;139:961–6.CrossRef Essner R, Lee JH, Wanek LA, et al. Contemporary surgical treatment of advanced-stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 2004;139:961–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Flanigan RC, Salmon SE, Blumenstein BA, et al. Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1655–9.CrossRef Flanigan RC, Salmon SE, Blumenstein BA, et al. Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1655–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosen SA, Buell JF, Yoshida A, et al. Initial presentation with stage IV colorectal cancer: how aggressive should we be? Arch Surg. 2000;135:530–4.CrossRef Rosen SA, Buell JF, Yoshida A, et al. Initial presentation with stage IV colorectal cancer: how aggressive should we be? Arch Surg. 2000;135:530–4.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hallissey MT, Allum WH, Roginski C, et al. Palliative surgery for gastric cancer. Cancer. 1988;62:440–4.CrossRef Hallissey MT, Allum WH, Roginski C, et al. Palliative surgery for gastric cancer. Cancer. 1988;62:440–4.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Danna EA, Sinha P, Gilbert M, Clements UK, Pulaski BA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Surgical removal of primary tumor reverses tumor-induced immunosuppression despite the presence of metastatic disease. Cancer Res. 2004; 64:2205–11.CrossRef Danna EA, Sinha P, Gilbert M, Clements UK, Pulaski BA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Surgical removal of primary tumor reverses tumor-induced immunosuppression despite the presence of metastatic disease. Cancer Res. 2004; 64:2205–11.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Norton L, Massague J, et al. Is cancer a disease of self-seeding? Nat Med. 2006;12:875–8.CrossRef Norton L, Massague J, et al. Is cancer a disease of self-seeding? Nat Med. 2006;12:875–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khan SA, Stewart AK, Morrow M. Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer? Surgery. 2002;132:620–7.CrossRef Khan SA, Stewart AK, Morrow M. Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer? Surgery. 2002;132:620–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Khan SA. Primary tumor resection in stage IV breast cancer: consistent benefit, or consistent bias? Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3285–7.CrossRef Khan SA. Primary tumor resection in stage IV breast cancer: consistent benefit, or consistent bias? Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3285–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Babiera GV, Rao R, Feng L, et al. Effect of primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:776–82.CrossRef Babiera GV, Rao R, Feng L, et al. Effect of primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:776–82.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rapiti E, Verkooijen HM, Vlastos G, et al. Complete excision of primary breast tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2743–9.CrossRef Rapiti E, Verkooijen HM, Vlastos G, et al. Complete excision of primary breast tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2743–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fields RC, Jeffe DB, Trinkaus K, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumor is associated with increased long-term survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer after controlling for site of metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3345–51.CrossRef Fields RC, Jeffe DB, Trinkaus K, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumor is associated with increased long-term survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer after controlling for site of metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3345–51.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Arriagada R, Rutqvist LE, Mattsson A, et al. Adequate locoregional treatment for early breast cancer may prevent secondary dissemination. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:2869–78.CrossRef Arriagada R, Rutqvist LE, Mattsson A, et al. Adequate locoregional treatment for early breast cancer may prevent secondary dissemination. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:2869–78.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hazard HW, Gorla SR, Scholtens D, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumor, chest wall control, and survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;113:2011–9.CrossRef Hazard HW, Gorla SR, Scholtens D, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumor, chest wall control, and survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;113:2011–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nieto Y, Nawaz S, Jones RB, et al. Prognostic model for relapse after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for stage IV oligometastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:707–18.CrossRef Nieto Y, Nawaz S, Jones RB, et al. Prognostic model for relapse after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for stage IV oligometastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:707–18.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bafford AC, Burstein HJ, Barkley CR, et al. Breast surgery in stage IV breast cancer: impact of staging and patient selection on overall survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115:7.CrossRef Bafford AC, Burstein HJ, Barkley CR, et al. Breast surgery in stage IV breast cancer: impact of staging and patient selection on overall survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115:7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ruiterkamp J, Ernst MF, van de Poll-Franse LV, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumour is associated with improved survival in patients with distant metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:1146–51.CrossRef Ruiterkamp J, Ernst MF, van de Poll-Franse LV, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumour is associated with improved survival in patients with distant metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:1146–51.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shien T, Kionoshita T, Shimzu C, et al. Primary tumor resection improves the survival of younger patients with metastatic breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2009;21:827–32.PubMed Shien T, Kionoshita T, Shimzu C, et al. Primary tumor resection improves the survival of younger patients with metastatic breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2009;21:827–32.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Harris E, Barry M, Kell MR. Meta-analysis to determine if surgical resection of the primary tumour in the setting of stage IV breast cancer impacts on survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2828–34.CrossRef Harris E, Barry M, Kell MR. Meta-analysis to determine if surgical resection of the primary tumour in the setting of stage IV breast cancer impacts on survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2828–34.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Petrelli F, Barni S. Surgery of primary tumors in stage 4 breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of published studies with meta-regression. Med Oncol. 2012;29:3282–90.CrossRef Petrelli F, Barni S. Surgery of primary tumors in stage 4 breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of published studies with meta-regression. Med Oncol. 2012;29:3282–90.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Khan SA. Surgical management of de novo stage 4 breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016;26:79–86.CrossRef Khan SA. Surgical management of de novo stage 4 breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016;26:79–86.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Baum M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W, et al. Does surgery unfavourably perturb the ‘‘natural history’’ of early breast cancer by accelerating the appearance of distant metastases? Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:508–15.CrossRef Baum M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W, et al. Does surgery unfavourably perturb the ‘‘natural history’’ of early breast cancer by accelerating the appearance of distant metastases? Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:508–15.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Coffey JC, Wang JH, Smith MJ, et al. Excisional surgery for cancer cure: therapy at a cost. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:760–8.CrossRef Coffey JC, Wang JH, Smith MJ, et al. Excisional surgery for cancer cure: therapy at a cost. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:760–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Demicheli R, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G. Does surgery modify growth kinetics of breast cancer micrometastases? Br J Cancer. 2001;85:490–2.CrossRef Demicheli R, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G. Does surgery modify growth kinetics of breast cancer micrometastases? Br J Cancer. 2001;85:490–2.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Soran A, Ozbas S, Kelsey SF, Gulluoglu BM. Randomized trial comparing locoregional resection of primary tumor with no surgery in stage IV breast cancer at the presentation (Protocol MF07-01): a study of Turkish Federation of the National Societies for Breast Disease. Breast J. 2009;15:399–403.CrossRef Soran A, Ozbas S, Kelsey SF, Gulluoglu BM. Randomized trial comparing locoregional resection of primary tumor with no surgery in stage IV breast cancer at the presentation (Protocol MF07-01): a study of Turkish Federation of the National Societies for Breast Disease. Breast J. 2009;15:399–403.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Makuch RW, Brass LM, Horwitz RI. Stratified randomization for clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:19–26.CrossRef Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Makuch RW, Brass LM, Horwitz RI. Stratified randomization for clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:19–26.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Badwe R, Hawaldar R, Nair N, Kaushik R, Parmar V, Siddique S, Budrukkar A, Mittra I, Gupta S. Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1380–8.CrossRef Badwe R, Hawaldar R, Nair N, Kaushik R, Parmar V, Siddique S, Budrukkar A, Mittra I, Gupta S. Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1380–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Neuman HB, Morrogh M, Gonen M, Van Zee KJ, Morrow M, King TA. Stage IV breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy: does surgery of the primary tumor matter? Cancer. 2010;116:1226–33CrossRef Neuman HB, Morrogh M, Gonen M, Van Zee KJ, Morrow M, King TA. Stage IV breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy: does surgery of the primary tumor matter? Cancer. 2010;116:1226–33CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ceylan B, Ozerdogan N. Factors affecting age of onset of menopause and determination of quality of life in menopause. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol. 2015;1:43–9.CrossRef Ceylan B, Ozerdogan N. Factors affecting age of onset of menopause and determination of quality of life in menopause. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol. 2015;1:43–9.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Mendoza ESR, Moreno E, Caguioa PB. Predictors of early distant metastasis in women with breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:645–52.CrossRef Mendoza ESR, Moreno E, Caguioa PB. Predictors of early distant metastasis in women with breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:645–52.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Retsky M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W. Premenopausal status accelerates relapse in node positive breast cancer: hypothesis links angiogenesis, screening controversy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;65:217–24.CrossRef Retsky M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W. Premenopausal status accelerates relapse in node positive breast cancer: hypothesis links angiogenesis, screening controversy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;65:217–24.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Nguyen DH, Truong PT, Walter CV, Hayashi E, Christie JL, Alexander C. Limited M1 disease: a significant prognostic factor for stage IV breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3028–34.CrossRef Nguyen DH, Truong PT, Walter CV, Hayashi E, Christie JL, Alexander C. Limited M1 disease: a significant prognostic factor for stage IV breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3028–34.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference André F, Bachelot T, Commo F, et al. Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER). Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:267–74.CrossRef André F, Bachelot T, Commo F, et al. Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER). Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:267–74.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Amir E, Miller N, Geddie W, et al. Prospective study evaluating the impact of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:587–92.CrossRef Amir E, Miller N, Geddie W, et al. Prospective study evaluating the impact of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:587–92.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Balci TA, Koc ZP, Komek H. Bone scan or (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: which modality better shows bone metastases of breast cancer? Breast Care Basel. 2012;7:389–93.PubMedPubMedCentral Balci TA, Koc ZP, Komek H. Bone scan or (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: which modality better shows bone metastases of breast cancer? Breast Care Basel. 2012;7:389–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Caglar M, Kupik O, Karabulut E, Høilund-Carlsen PF. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: do we still need the bone scan? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2016;35:3–11.PubMed Caglar M, Kupik O, Karabulut E, Høilund-Carlsen PF. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: do we still need the bone scan? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2016;35:3–11.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Niikura N, Hashimoto J, Kazama T, et al. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in breast cancer patients with suspected bone metastasis. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:662–7.CrossRef Niikura N, Hashimoto J, Kazama T, et al. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in breast cancer patients with suspected bone metastasis. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:662–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Randomized Trial Comparing Resection of Primary Tumor with No Surgery in Stage IV Breast Cancer at Presentation: Protocol MF07-01
Authors
Atilla Soran, MD, MPH, FNCBC, FACS
Vahit Ozmen, MD, FACS
Serdar Ozbas, MD
Hasan Karanlik, MD
Mahmut Muslumanoglu, MD
Abdullah Igci, MD
Zafer Canturk, MD
Zafer Utkan, MD
Cihangir Ozaslan, MD
Turkkan Evrensel, MD
Cihan Uras, MD
Erol Aksaz, MD
Aykut Soyder, MD
Umit Ugurlu, MD
Cavit Col, MD
Neslihan Cabioglu, MD
Betül Bozkurt, MD
Ali Uzunkoy, MD
Neset Koksal, MD
Bahadir M. Gulluoglu, MD, FACS
Bulent Unal, MD
Can Atalay, MD
Emin Yıldırım, MD
Ergun Erdem, MD
Semra Salimoglu, MD
Atakan Sezer, MD
Ayhan Koyuncu, MD
Gunay Gurleyik, MD
Haluk Alagol, MD
Nalan Ulufi, MD
Uğur Berberoglu, MD
Mustafa Dulger, MD
Omer Cengiz, MD
Efe Sezgin, PhD
Ronald Johnson, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6494-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2018 Go to the issue