Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2018

01-10-2018 | Breast Oncology

Breast Conservation and Negative Margins in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: The Impact of Oncoplastic Surgery and Shave Margins in 358 Patients

Authors: Rita A. Mukhtar, MD, Jasmine Wong, MD, Merisa Piper, MD, Zelos Zhu, BS, Kelly Fahrner-Scott, BA, Matina Mamounas, BS, Hani Sbitany, MD, Michael Alvarado, MD, Robert Foster, MD, Cheryl Ewing, MD, Laura Esserman, MD, MBA

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast grows in a diffuse pattern, making complete surgical excision difficult. This results in high rates of positive margins and low rates of successful breast-conserving surgery. We hypothesized that utilizing oncoplastic surgical techniques and selective shave margins would be associated with lower positive margin rates and increased breast conservation in women with ILC.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis in a large cohort of prospectively collected ILC cases who received surgical treatment at the University of California, San Francisco, between 1992 and 2017. We identified all patients with histologically proven, unilateral or bilateral, stage 1–3 ILC. The primary outcome was positive margin rates, defined as no ink on tumor.

Results

We identified 365 tumors in 358 women, with an average age of 61 years, who underwent breast-conserving surgery, and found that the use of oncoplastic techniques (odds ratio [OR] 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21–0.79, p = 0.008) and the selective use of shave margins (OR 0.393, 95% CI 0.22–0.7, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with lower positive margin rates, when adjusted for tumor size and multifocality. The success rate for breast-conservation surgery was 75%, with a 25% conversion rate to mastectomy.

Conclusions

Surgeons should consider routine use of oncoplastic techniques and shave margins when performing breast-conservation surgery for women with ILC as these methods are associated with significantly lower odds of having positive margins and higher breast-conservation rates.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(1):6–11.CrossRef Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(1):6–11.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.CrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):704–16.CrossRef Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):704–16.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sakr RA, Poulet B, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Clough KB. Clear margins for invasive lobular carcinoma: a surgical challenge. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(4):350–56.CrossRef Sakr RA, Poulet B, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Clough KB. Clear margins for invasive lobular carcinoma: a surgical challenge. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(4):350–56.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Houssami N, Morrow M. Margins in breast conservation: a clinician’s perspective and what the literature tells us. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(1):2–7.CrossRef Houssami N, Morrow M. Margins in breast conservation: a clinician’s perspective and what the literature tells us. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(1):2–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wanis ML, Wong JA, Rodriguez S, et al. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma. Am Surg. 2013;79(10):1119–22.PubMed Wanis ML, Wong JA, Rodriguez S, et al. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma. Am Surg. 2013;79(10):1119–22.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Clough KB, Gouveia PF, Benyahi D, et al. Positive margins after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4247–53.CrossRef Clough KB, Gouveia PF, Benyahi D, et al. Positive margins after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4247–53.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Johnson K, Sarma D, Hwang ES. Lobular breast cancer series: imaging. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:94.CrossRef Johnson K, Sarma D, Hwang ES. Lobular breast cancer series: imaging. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:94.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sledge GW, Chagpar A, Perou C. Collective Wisdom: Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:18–21.CrossRef Sledge GW, Chagpar A, Perou C. Collective Wisdom: Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:18–21.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mamtani A, King TA. Lobular breast cancer: different disease, different algorithms? Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018;27(1):81–94.CrossRef Mamtani A, King TA. Lobular breast cancer: different disease, different algorithms? Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018;27(1):81–94.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T, et al. The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(2):415–22.CrossRef Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T, et al. The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(2):415–22.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lips EH, Mukhtar RA, Yau C, et al. Lobular histology and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(1):35–43.CrossRef Lips EH, Mukhtar RA, Yau C, et al. Lobular histology and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(1):35–43.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stein RG, Wollschlager D, Kreienberg R, et al. The impact of breast cancer biological subtyping on tumor size assessment by ultrasound and mammography—a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 6543 primary breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:459.CrossRef Stein RG, Wollschlager D, Kreienberg R, et al. The impact of breast cancer biological subtyping on tumor size assessment by ultrasound and mammography—a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 6543 primary breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:459.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Takehara M, Tamura M, Kameda H, Ogita M. Examination of breast conserving therapy in lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer. 2004;11(1):69–72.CrossRef Takehara M, Tamura M, Kameda H, Ogita M. Examination of breast conserving therapy in lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer. 2004;11(1):69–72.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Clough KB, van la Parra RFD, Thygesen HH, et al. Long-term results after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer: a 10-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):165–71.CrossRef Clough KB, van la Parra RFD, Thygesen HH, et al. Long-term results after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer: a 10-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):165–71.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375–91.CrossRef Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375–91.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wijgman DJ, Ten Wolde B, van Groesen NR, Keemers-Gels ME, van den Wildenberg FJ, Strobbe LJ. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(4):665–71.CrossRef Wijgman DJ, Ten Wolde B, van Groesen NR, Keemers-Gels ME, van den Wildenberg FJ, Strobbe LJ. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(4):665–71.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):26–34.CrossRef Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):26–34.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Clough KB, Benyahi D, Nos C, Charles C, Sarfati I. Oncoplastic surgery: pushing the limits of breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2015;21(2):140–46.CrossRef Clough KB, Benyahi D, Nos C, Charles C, Sarfati I. Oncoplastic surgery: pushing the limits of breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2015;21(2):140–46.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(3):145–57.CrossRef Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(3):145–57.CrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Maxwell J, Roberts A, Cil T, Somogyi R, Osman F. Current practices and barriers to the integration of oncoplastic breast surgery: a Canadian perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3259–65.CrossRef Maxwell J, Roberts A, Cil T, Somogyi R, Osman F. Current practices and barriers to the integration of oncoplastic breast surgery: a Canadian perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3259–65.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wang K, Ren Y, He J. Cavity shaving plus lumpectomy versus lumpectomy alone for patients with breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0168705.CrossRef Wang K, Ren Y, He J. Cavity shaving plus lumpectomy versus lumpectomy alone for patients with breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0168705.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(6):503–10.CrossRef Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(6):503–10.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082–88.CrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082–88.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S, Kaufman G, Massey E, Nos C. Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer based on tumour location and a quadrant-per-quadrant atlas. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1389–95.CrossRef Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S, Kaufman G, Massey E, Nos C. Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer based on tumour location and a quadrant-per-quadrant atlas. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1389–95.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1297–1303.CrossRef Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1297–1303.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Azu M, Goyal S, Patel U, Haffty B, Kearney T. Has placement of surgical clips in the lumpectomy bed fallen out of favor? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1529–32.CrossRef Azu M, Goyal S, Patel U, Haffty B, Kearney T. Has placement of surgical clips in the lumpectomy bed fallen out of favor? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1529–32.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast Conservation and Negative Margins in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: The Impact of Oncoplastic Surgery and Shave Margins in 358 Patients
Authors
Rita A. Mukhtar, MD
Jasmine Wong, MD
Merisa Piper, MD
Zelos Zhu, BS
Kelly Fahrner-Scott, BA
Matina Mamounas, BS
Hani Sbitany, MD
Michael Alvarado, MD
Robert Foster, MD
Cheryl Ewing, MD
Laura Esserman, MD, MBA
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6682-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2018 Go to the issue