Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Radiotherapy | Research

Early relapse is an adverse prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: results from a nationwide registry study

Authors: Chi-Ying Tsai, Yu-Wen Wen, Shu-Ru Lee, Shu-Hang Ng, Chung-Jan Kang, Li-Yu Lee, Chuen Hsueh, Chien-Yu Lin, Kang-Hsing Fan, Hung-Ming Wang, Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Chih-Hua Yeh, Chih-Hung Lin, Chung-Kan Tsao, Tuan-Jen Fang, Shiang-Fu Huang, Li-Ang Lee, Ku-Hao Fang, Yu-Chien Wang, Wan-Ni Lin, Li-Jen Hsin, Tzu-Chen Yen, Nai-Ming Cheng, Chun-Ta Liao

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The prognostic significance of the relapse interval in patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a matter of ongoing debate. In this large-scale, registry-based, nationwide study, we examined whether the time interval between surgery and the first disease relapse may affect survival outcomes in Taiwanese patients with OCSCC.

Methods

Data made available by the Taiwan Health Promotion Administration as of 2004 were obtained. The study cohort consisted of patients who were included in the registry between 2011 and 2017. Disease staging was performed according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, Eight Edition. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 13,789 patients with OCSCC who received surgical treatment. A total of 2327 (16.9%) patients experienced a first disease relapse. The optimal cutoff value for the relapse interval was 330 days when both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) (≤ 330/>330 days, n = 1630/697) were taken into account. In addition, we undertook a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis of patients (n = 654 each) with early (≤ 330 days) versus late (> 330 days) relapse.

Results

The median follow-up time in the entire study cohort was 702 days (433 and 2001 days in the early and late relapse groups, respectively). Compared with patients who experienced late relapse, those with early relapse showed a higher prevalence of the following adverse prognostic factors: pT4, pN3, pStage IV, poor differentiation, depth of invasion ≥ 10 mm, and extra-nodal extension. Multivariable analysis revealed that early relapse was an independent adverse prognostic factor for both 5-year DSS and OS (average hazard ratios [AHRs]: 3.24 and 3.91, respectively). In the PS-matched cohort, patients who experienced early relapse showed less favorable 5-year DSS: 58% versus 30%, p < 0.0001 (AHR: 3.10 [2.69 − 3.57]) and OS: 49% versus 22%, p < 0.0001 (AHR: 3.32 [2.89 − 3.81]).

Conclusion

After adjustment for potential confounders and PS matching, early relapse was an adverse prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with OCSCC. Our findings may have significant implications for risk stratification.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak T, Van Glabbeke M, Bourhis J, Forastiere A, et al. Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (# 22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck. 2005;27:843–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20279.CrossRef Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak T, Van Glabbeke M, Bourhis J, Forastiere A, et al. Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (# 22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck. 2005;27:843–50. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hed.​20279.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Head and Neck Cancers, Version II. 2022 Available at: http://www.nccn.org/. (accessed on August 18, 2022.) National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Head and Neck Cancers, Version II. 2022 Available at: http://​www.​nccn.​org/​. (accessed on August 18, 2022.)
18.
go back to reference Liao CT, Hsieh CH, Fan WL, Ng SH, Cheng NM, Lee LY, et al. A combined analysis of maximum standardized uptake value on FDG-PET, genetic markers, and clinicopathological risk factors in the prognostic stratification of patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Eur j Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04453-x.CrossRef Liao CT, Hsieh CH, Fan WL, Ng SH, Cheng NM, Lee LY, et al. A combined analysis of maximum standardized uptake value on FDG-PET, genetic markers, and clinicopathological risk factors in the prognostic stratification of patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Eur j Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:84–93. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-019-04453-x.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2017. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2017.
24.
go back to reference American College of Surgeons. Standards for Oncology Registry Entry. STORE 2021. Effective for Cases Diagnosed. January 1, 2021. American College of Surgeons. Standards for Oncology Registry Entry. STORE 2021. Effective for Cases Diagnosed. January 1, 2021.
25.
29.
go back to reference Lee LY, Lin CY, Cheng NM, Tsai CY, Hsueh C, Fan KH, et al. Poor tumor differentiation is an inde-pendent adverse prognostic variable in patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer – comparison with pathological risk factors according to the NCCN guidelines. Cancer Med. 2021;10:6627–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4195.CrossRef Lee LY, Lin CY, Cheng NM, Tsai CY, Hsueh C, Fan KH, et al. Poor tumor differentiation is an inde-pendent adverse prognostic variable in patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer – comparison with pathological risk factors according to the NCCN guidelines. Cancer Med. 2021;10:6627–41. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cam4.​4195.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Liao CT, Fan KH, Lin CY, Wang HM, Huang SF, Chen IH, et al. Impact of a second FDG PET scan before adjuvant therapy for the early detection of residual/relapsing tumours in high-risk patients with oral cavity cancer and pathological extracapsular spread. Eur j Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:944–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2103-2.CrossRef Liao CT, Fan KH, Lin CY, Wang HM, Huang SF, Chen IH, et al. Impact of a second FDG PET scan before adjuvant therapy for the early detection of residual/relapsing tumours in high-risk patients with oral cavity cancer and pathological extracapsular spread. Eur j Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:944–55. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-012-2103-2.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early relapse is an adverse prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: results from a nationwide registry study
Authors
Chi-Ying Tsai
Yu-Wen Wen
Shu-Ru Lee
Shu-Hang Ng
Chung-Jan Kang
Li-Yu Lee
Chuen Hsueh
Chien-Yu Lin
Kang-Hsing Fan
Hung-Ming Wang
Chia-Hsun Hsieh
Chih-Hua Yeh
Chih-Hung Lin
Chung-Kan Tsao
Tuan-Jen Fang
Shiang-Fu Huang
Li-Ang Lee
Ku-Hao Fang
Yu-Chien Wang
Wan-Ni Lin
Li-Jen Hsin
Tzu-Chen Yen
Nai-Ming Cheng
Chun-Ta Liao
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Radiotherapy
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10602-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine