Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Radiotherapy | Research article

Development of the ‘REadiness SElf-assessment (RESEA) guide’ to assist low and middle-income countries with establishing safe and sustainable radiotherapy services: a pragmatic sequential mixed qualitative methods project

Authors: Andrew Donkor, Tim Luckett, Sanchia Aranda, Verna Vanderpuye, Jane L. Phillips

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Improving access to radiotherapy services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is challenging. Many LMICs’ radiotherapy initiatives fail because of multi-faceted barriers leading to significant wastage of scarce resources. Supporting LMICs to self-assess their readiness for establishing radiotherapy services will help to improve cancer outcomes by ensuring safe, effective and sustainable evidenced-based cancer care. The aim of the study was to develop practical guidance for LMICs on self-assessing their readiness to establish safe and sustainable radiotherapy services.

Methods

The Access to Radiotherapy for Cancer treatment (ARC) Project was a pragmatic sequential mixed qualitative methods design underpinned by the World Health Organisation’s ‘Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions Framework’ and ‘Health System Building Blocks Framework for Action’ conceptual frameworks. This paper reports on the process of overall data integration and meta-inference from previously published components comprising a systematic review and two-part qualitative study (semi-structured interviews and a participant validation process). The meta-inferences enabled a series of radiotherapy readiness self-assessment requirements to be generated, formalised as a REadiness SElf-Assessment (RESEA) Guide’ for use by LMICs.

Findings

The meta-inferences identified a large number of factors that acted as facilitators and/or barriers, depending on the situation, which include: awareness and advocacy; political leadership; epidemiological data; financial resources; basic physical infrastructure; radiation safety legislative and regulatory framework; project management; and radiotherapy workforce training and education. ‘Commitment’, ‘cooperation’, ‘capacity’ and ‘catalyst’ were identified as the key domains enabling development of radiotherapy services. Across these four domains, the RESEA Guide included 37 requirements and 120 readiness questions that LMICs need to consider and answer as part of establishing a new radiotherapy service.

Conclusions

The RESEA Guide provides a new resource for LMICs to self-assess their capacity to establish safe and sustainable radiotherapy services. Future evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility of the RESEA Guide is needed to inform its validity. Further work, including field study, is needed to inform further refinements. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are required to reduce the data set and test the fit of the four-factor structure (commitment, cooperation, capacity and catalyst) found in the current study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
go back to reference Donkor A, Luckett T, Aranda S, Phillips JL. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of cancer treatment and palliative care strategies in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review. IJPH. 2018;63(9):1047–57. Donkor A, Luckett T, Aranda S, Phillips JL. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of cancer treatment and palliative care strategies in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review. IJPH. 2018;63(9):1047–57.
10.
go back to reference Ndlovu N. Radiotherapy treatment in cancer control and its important role in Africa. Ecancermed Sci. 2019;13:942. Ndlovu N. Radiotherapy treatment in cancer control and its important role in Africa. Ecancermed Sci. 2019;13:942.
11.
go back to reference Donkor A, Luckett T, Aranda S, Vanderpuye V, Phillips JL. Experiences of barriers and facilitators to establishing and sustaining radiotherapy services in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020:1–12. Donkor A, Luckett T, Aranda S, Vanderpuye V, Phillips JL. Experiences of barriers and facilitators to establishing and sustaining radiotherapy services in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020:1–12.
13.
go back to reference Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. London: Sage; 2009. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. London: Sage; 2009.
14.
go back to reference Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A. Qualitative research methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2020. Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A. Qualitative research methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2020.
15.
go back to reference O'Reilly M, Kiyimba N. Advanced qualitative research: a guide to using theory. London: Sage; 2015. O'Reilly M, Kiyimba N. Advanced qualitative research: a guide to using theory. London: Sage; 2015.
18.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for actions: global report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 1–103. World Health Organization. Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for actions: global report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 1–103.
19.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. Everybody's business--strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO's framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. p. 1–56. World Health Organisation. Everybody's business--strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO's framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. p. 1–56.
20.
go back to reference Mutale W, Balabanova D, Chintu N, Mwanamwenge MT, Ayles H. Application of system thinking concepts in health system strengthening in low-income settings: a proposed conceptual framework for the evaluation of a complex health system intervention: the case of the BHOMA intervention in Zambia. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(1):112–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12160.CrossRefPubMed Mutale W, Balabanova D, Chintu N, Mwanamwenge MT, Ayles H. Application of system thinking concepts in health system strengthening in low-income settings: a proposed conceptual framework for the evaluation of a complex health system intervention: the case of the BHOMA intervention in Zambia. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(1):112–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jep.​12160.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Closser S, Cox K, Parris TM, Landis RM, Justice J, Gopinath R, et al. The Impact of Polio Eradication on Routine Immunization and Primary Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Study. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(suppl_1):S504–S13.CrossRef Closser S, Cox K, Parris TM, Landis RM, Justice J, Gopinath R, et al. The Impact of Polio Eradication on Routine Immunization and Primary Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Study. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(suppl_1):S504–S13.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC methods programme Version (1). Lancaster. 2006:b92. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC methods programme Version (1). Lancaster. 2006:b92.
24.
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. Planning national radiotherapy services: a practical tool. In: Agency IAE, editor. Vienna: IAEA; 2010. p. 1–100. International Atomic Energy Agency. Planning national radiotherapy services: a practical tool. In: Agency IAE, editor. Vienna: IAEA; 2010. p. 1–100.
25.
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiotherapy facilities: master planning and concept design considerations. Vienna: IAEA; 2014. p. 1-47 International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiotherapy facilities: master planning and concept design considerations. Vienna: IAEA; 2014. p. 1-47
26.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Washington: Sage; 2018. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Washington: Sage; 2018.
29.
go back to reference Gholamhosseini L, Ayatollahi H. The design and application of an e-health readiness assessment tool. JHIM. 2017;46(1):32–41. Gholamhosseini L, Ayatollahi H. The design and application of an e-health readiness assessment tool. JHIM. 2017;46(1):32–41.
32.
go back to reference Morton R, Henshall S, Aranda S. City Cancer challenge: delivering sustainable, local solutions for cancer care. Glob Cancer Initiat. 2019:22–5. Morton R, Henshall S, Aranda S. City Cancer challenge: delivering sustainable, local solutions for cancer care. Glob Cancer Initiat. 2019:22–5.
33.
go back to reference Rollnick S, Mason P, Butler CC. Health behavior change e-book. 2nd ed. Elsevier Health Sciences: Sydney; 2010. Rollnick S, Mason P, Butler CC. Health behavior change e-book. 2nd ed. Elsevier Health Sciences: Sydney; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Development of the ‘REadiness SElf-assessment (RESEA) guide’ to assist low and middle-income countries with establishing safe and sustainable radiotherapy services: a pragmatic sequential mixed qualitative methods project
Authors
Andrew Donkor
Tim Luckett
Sanchia Aranda
Verna Vanderpuye
Jane L. Phillips
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Radiotherapy
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06274-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue