Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2022

Open Access 18-03-2022 | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

Radiomics with 3-dimensional magnetic resonance fingerprinting: influence of dictionary design on repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features

Authors: Shohei Fujita, Akifumi Hagiwara, Koichiro Yasaka, Hiroyuki Akai, Akira Kunimatsu, Shigeru Kiryu, Issei Fukunaga, Shimpei Kato, Toshiaki Akashi, Koji Kamagata, Akihiko Wada, Osamu Abe, Shigeki Aoki

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the influence of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) dictionary design on radiomic features using in vivo human brain scans.

Methods

Scan-rescans of three-dimensional MRF and conventional T1-weighted imaging were performed on 21 healthy volunteers (9 males and 12 females; mean age, 41.3 ± 14.6 years; age range, 22–72 years). Five patients with multiple sclerosis (3 males and 2 females; mean age, 41.2 ± 7.3 years; age range, 32–53 years) were also included. MRF data were reconstructed using various dictionaries with different step sizes. First- and second-order radiomic features were extracted from each dataset. Intra-dictionary repeatability and inter-dictionary reproducibility were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Features with ICCs > 0.90 were considered acceptable. Relative changes were calculated to assess inter-dictionary biases.

Results

The overall scan-rescan ICCs of MRF-based radiomics ranged from 0.86 to 0.95, depending on dictionary step size. No significant differences were observed in the overall scan-rescan repeatability of MRF-based radiomic features and conventional T1-weighted imaging (p = 1.00). Intra-dictionary repeatability was insensitive to dictionary step size differences. MRF-based radiomic features varied among dictionaries (overall ICC for inter-dictionary reproducibility, 0.62–0.99), especially when step sizes were large. First-order and gray level co-occurrence matrix features were the most reproducible feature classes among different step size dictionaries. T1 map-derived radiomic features provided higher repeatability and reproducibility among dictionaries than those obtained with T2 maps.

Conclusion

MRF-based radiomic features are highly repeatable in various dictionary step sizes. Caution is warranted when performing MRF-based radiomics using datasets containing maps generated from different dictionaries.

Key Points

MRF-based radiomic features are highly repeatable in various dictionary step sizes.
Use of different MRF dictionaries may result in variable radiomic features, even when the same MRF acquisition data are used.
Caution is needed when performing radiomic analysis using data reconstructed from different dictionaries.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577CrossRef Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aerts HJ (2016) The potential of radiomic-based phenotyping in precision medicine: a review. JAMA Oncol 2:1636–1642CrossRef Aerts HJ (2016) The potential of radiomic-based phenotyping in precision medicine: a review. JAMA Oncol 2:1636–1642CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kassner A, Thornhill RE (2010) Texture analysis: a review of neurologic MR imaging applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:809–816 Kassner A, Thornhill RE (2010) Texture analysis: a review of neurologic MR imaging applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:809–816
4.
go back to reference Hagiwara A, Fujita S, Ohno Y, Aoki S (2020) Variability and standardization of quantitative imaging: monoparametric to multiparametric quantification, radiomics, and artificial intelligence. Invest Radiol 55:601–616CrossRef Hagiwara A, Fujita S, Ohno Y, Aoki S (2020) Variability and standardization of quantitative imaging: monoparametric to multiparametric quantification, radiomics, and artificial intelligence. Invest Radiol 55:601–616CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749–762CrossRef Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749–762CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Berenguer R, Pastor-Juan MDR, Canales-Vazquez J et al (2018) Radiomics of CT features may be nonreproducible and redundant: influence of CT acquisition parameters. Radiology 288:407–415CrossRef Berenguer R, Pastor-Juan MDR, Canales-Vazquez J et al (2018) Radiomics of CT features may be nonreproducible and redundant: influence of CT acquisition parameters. Radiology 288:407–415CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zwanenburg A, Vallieres M, Abdalah MA et al (2020) The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology 295:328–338CrossRef Zwanenburg A, Vallieres M, Abdalah MA et al (2020) The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology 295:328–338CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Meyer M, Ronald J, Vernuccio F et al (2019) Reproducibility of CT radiomic features within the same patient: influence of radiation dose and CT reconstruction settings. Radiology 293:583–591CrossRef Meyer M, Ronald J, Vernuccio F et al (2019) Reproducibility of CT radiomic features within the same patient: influence of radiation dose and CT reconstruction settings. Radiology 293:583–591CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baessler B, Weiss K, Pinto Dos Santos D (2019) Robustness and reproducibility of radiomics in magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study. Invest Radiol 54:221–228CrossRef Baessler B, Weiss K, Pinto Dos Santos D (2019) Robustness and reproducibility of radiomics in magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study. Invest Radiol 54:221–228CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fornacon-Wood I, Mistry H, Ackermann CJ et al (2020) Reliability and prognostic value of radiomic features are highly dependent on choice of feature extraction platform. Eur Radiol 30:6241–6250CrossRef Fornacon-Wood I, Mistry H, Ackermann CJ et al (2020) Reliability and prognostic value of radiomic features are highly dependent on choice of feature extraction platform. Eur Radiol 30:6241–6250CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N et al (2013) Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 495:187–192CrossRef Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N et al (2013) Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 495:187–192CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Korzdorfer G, Kirsch R, Liu K et al (2019) Reproducibility and repeatability of MR fingerprinting relaxometry in the human brain. Radiology 292:429–437CrossRef Korzdorfer G, Kirsch R, Liu K et al (2019) Reproducibility and repeatability of MR fingerprinting relaxometry in the human brain. Radiology 292:429–437CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Buonincontri G, Biagi L, Retico A et al (2019) Multi-site repeatability and reproducibility of MR fingerprinting of the healthy brain at 1.5 and 3.0T. Neuroimage 195:362–372CrossRef Buonincontri G, Biagi L, Retico A et al (2019) Multi-site repeatability and reproducibility of MR fingerprinting of the healthy brain at 1.5 and 3.0T. Neuroimage 195:362–372CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Buonincontri G, Kurzawski JW, Kaggie JD et al (2020) Three dimensional MRF obtains highly repeatable and reproducible multi-parametric estimations in the healthy human brain at 1.5T and 3T. Neuroimage 226:117573CrossRef Buonincontri G, Kurzawski JW, Kaggie JD et al (2020) Three dimensional MRF obtains highly repeatable and reproducible multi-parametric estimations in the healthy human brain at 1.5T and 3T. Neuroimage 226:117573CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hamilton JI, Jiang Y, Chen Y et al (2017) MR fingerprinting for rapid quantification of myocardial T1, T2 , and proton spin density. Magn Reson Med 77:1446–1458CrossRef Hamilton JI, Jiang Y, Chen Y et al (2017) MR fingerprinting for rapid quantification of myocardial T1, T2 , and proton spin density. Magn Reson Med 77:1446–1458CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Panda A, Chen Y, Ropella-Panagis K et al (2019) Repeatability and reproducibility of 3D MR fingerprinting relaxometry measurements in normal breast tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:1133–1143CrossRef Panda A, Chen Y, Ropella-Panagis K et al (2019) Repeatability and reproducibility of 3D MR fingerprinting relaxometry measurements in normal breast tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:1133–1143CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chen Y, Panda A, Pahwa S et al (2019) Three-dimensional MR fingerprinting for quantitative breast imaging. Radiology 290:33–40CrossRef Chen Y, Panda A, Pahwa S et al (2019) Three-dimensional MR fingerprinting for quantitative breast imaging. Radiology 290:33–40CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Panda A, Obmann VC, Lo WC et al (2019) MR fingerprinting and ADC mapping for characterization of lesions in the transition zone of the prostate gland. Radiology 292:685–694CrossRef Panda A, Obmann VC, Lo WC et al (2019) MR fingerprinting and ADC mapping for characterization of lesions in the transition zone of the prostate gland. Radiology 292:685–694CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chen Y, Jiang Y, Pahwa S et al (2016) MR fingerprinting for rapid quantitative abdominal imaging. Radiology 279:278–286CrossRef Chen Y, Jiang Y, Pahwa S et al (2016) MR fingerprinting for rapid quantitative abdominal imaging. Radiology 279:278–286CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ma D, Jones SE, Deshmane A et al (2019) Development of high-resolution 3D MR fingerprinting for detection and characterization of epileptic lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:1333–1346CrossRef Ma D, Jones SE, Deshmane A et al (2019) Development of high-resolution 3D MR fingerprinting for detection and characterization of epileptic lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:1333–1346CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ma D, Jiang Y, Chen Y et al (2018) Fast 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting for a whole-brain coverage. Magn Reson Med 79:2190–2197CrossRef Ma D, Jiang Y, Chen Y et al (2018) Fast 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting for a whole-brain coverage. Magn Reson Med 79:2190–2197CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Badve C, Yu A, Dastmalchian S et al (2017) MR fingerprinting of adult brain tumors: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:492–499CrossRef Badve C, Yu A, Dastmalchian S et al (2017) MR fingerprinting of adult brain tumors: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:492–499CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bipin Mehta B, Coppo S, Frances McGivney D et al (2019) Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: a technical review. Magn Reson Med 81:25–46CrossRef Bipin Mehta B, Coppo S, Frances McGivney D et al (2019) Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: a technical review. Magn Reson Med 81:25–46CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Ma D, Keenan KE, Stupic KF, Gulani V, Griswold MA (2017) Repeatability of magnetic resonance fingerprinting T1 and T2 estimates assessed using the ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom. Magn Reson Med 78:1452–1457CrossRef Jiang Y, Ma D, Keenan KE, Stupic KF, Gulani V, Griswold MA (2017) Repeatability of magnetic resonance fingerprinting T1 and T2 estimates assessed using the ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom. Magn Reson Med 78:1452–1457CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kato Y, Ichikawa K, Okudaira K et al (2019) Comprehensive evaluation of B1(+)-corrected FISP-based magnetic resonance fingerprinting: accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of T1 and T2 relaxation times for ISMRM/NIST system phantom and volunteers. Magn Reson Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0016 Kato Y, Ichikawa K, Okudaira K et al (2019) Comprehensive evaluation of B1(+)-corrected FISP-based magnetic resonance fingerprinting: accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of T1 and T2 relaxation times for ISMRM/NIST system phantom and volunteers. Magn Reson Med Sci. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2463/​mrms.​mp.​2019-0016
29.
go back to reference Sanduleanu S, Woodruff HC, de Jong EEC et al (2018) Tracking tumor biology with radiomics: a systematic review utilizing a radiomics quality score. Radiother Oncol 127:349–360CrossRef Sanduleanu S, Woodruff HC, de Jong EEC et al (2018) Tracking tumor biology with radiomics: a systematic review utilizing a radiomics quality score. Radiother Oncol 127:349–360CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Traverso A, Wee L, Dekker A, Gillies R (2018) Repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 102:1143–1158CrossRef Traverso A, Wee L, Dekker A, Gillies R (2018) Repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 102:1143–1158CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hatt M, Vallieres M, Visvikis D, Zwanenburg A (2018) IBSI: an international community radiomics standardization initiative. J Nucl Med 59:287–287 Hatt M, Vallieres M, Visvikis D, Zwanenburg A (2018) IBSI: an international community radiomics standardization initiative. J Nucl Med 59:287–287
32.
go back to reference Cao X, Ye H, Liao C, Li Q, He H, Zhong J (2019) Fast 3D brain MR fingerprinting based on multi-axis spiral projection trajectory. Magn Reson Med 82:289–301CrossRef Cao X, Ye H, Liao C, Li Q, He H, Zhong J (2019) Fast 3D brain MR fingerprinting based on multi-axis spiral projection trajectory. Magn Reson Med 82:289–301CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J et al (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341CrossRef Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J et al (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341CrossRef
34.
go back to reference van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C et al (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107CrossRef van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C et al (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Mahmoud-Ghoneim D, Alkaabi MK, de Certaines JD, Goettsche FM (2008) The impact of image dynamic range on texture classification of brain white matter. BMC Med Imaging 8:18CrossRef Mahmoud-Ghoneim D, Alkaabi MK, de Certaines JD, Goettsche FM (2008) The impact of image dynamic range on texture classification of brain white matter. BMC Med Imaging 8:18CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240PubMed Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240PubMed
37.
go back to reference Coroller TP, Agrawal V, Narayan V et al (2016) Radiomic phenotype features predict pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 119:480–486CrossRef Coroller TP, Agrawal V, Narayan V et al (2016) Radiomic phenotype features predict pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 119:480–486CrossRef
38.
go back to reference van Velden FH, Kramer GM, Frings V et al (2016) Repeatability of radiomic features in non-small-cell lung cancer [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT studies: impact of reconstruction and delineation. Mol Imaging Biol 18:788–795CrossRef van Velden FH, Kramer GM, Frings V et al (2016) Repeatability of radiomic features in non-small-cell lung cancer [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT studies: impact of reconstruction and delineation. Mol Imaging Biol 18:788–795CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bogowicz M, Riesterer O, Bundschuh RA et al (2016) Stability of radiomic features in CT perfusion maps. Phys Med Biol 61:8736–8749CrossRef Bogowicz M, Riesterer O, Bundschuh RA et al (2016) Stability of radiomic features in CT perfusion maps. Phys Med Biol 61:8736–8749CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Scalco E, Belfatto A, Mastropietro A et al (2020) T2w-MRI signal normalization affects radiomics features reproducibility. Med Phys 47:1680–1691 Scalco E, Belfatto A, Mastropietro A et al (2020) T2w-MRI signal normalization affects radiomics features reproducibility. Med Phys 47:1680–1691
41.
go back to reference Jang J, Ngo LH, Mancio J et al (2020) Reproducibility of segmentation-based myocardial radiomic features with cardiac MRI. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2:e190216CrossRef Jang J, Ngo LH, Mancio J et al (2020) Reproducibility of segmentation-based myocardial radiomic features with cardiac MRI. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2:e190216CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiomics with 3-dimensional magnetic resonance fingerprinting: influence of dictionary design on repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features
Authors
Shohei Fujita
Akifumi Hagiwara
Koichiro Yasaka
Hiroyuki Akai
Akira Kunimatsu
Shigeru Kiryu
Issei Fukunaga
Shimpei Kato
Toshiaki Akashi
Koji Kamagata
Akihiko Wada
Osamu Abe
Shigeki Aoki
Publication date
18-03-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08555-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

European Radiology 7/2022 Go to the issue