Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Interventional

Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection by Minimizing Preliminary Planning Imaging

Author: Nam Chull Paik

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To test whether radiation dose reduction in CTF-guided LIESI would be achieved by replacing the preliminary planning CT with a spot CTF while still maintaining technical performance.

Methods

This retrospective study included a review of 247 consecutive procedures performed on 241 patients before (comparison group: n = 124) and after (study group: n = 123) instituting the above-mentioned the protocol modification. The patient (age, sex, body diameter, and level injected) and performance (procedure time, number of CTF acquisitions, and DLP) characteristics were compared between the two groups.

Results

The total DLP of the study group (median 4.94 mGy · cm) was significantly reduced compared to that of the comparison group (median 31.78 mGy · cm, P < 0.001). The numbers of CTF acquisitions needed for needle placement and epidurography were very similar for both groups (median 3, P = 0.685). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter for the study group (5:14 ± 1:06 min) compared to the comparison group (5:53 ± 1:19 min, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

When conducting CTF-guided LIESIs, a significant radiation dose reduction (median 84.5 % in DLP, P < 0.001) can be achieved by minimizing the preliminary planning examination, without compromising the number of CTF acquisitions and the procedure time.

Key Points

• Majority of radiation is delivered during the preliminary planning image acquisition
• Spot CTF scan can replace the preliminary planning helical examination
• Patient dose can be reduced to as low as 0.09 mSv
Literature
1.
go back to reference Friedly J, Chan L, Deyo R (2007) Increases in lumbosacral injections in the medicare population: 1994 to 2001. Spine 32:1754–1760PubMedCrossRef Friedly J, Chan L, Deyo R (2007) Increases in lumbosacral injections in the medicare population: 1994 to 2001. Spine 32:1754–1760PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hameed F, Hunter DJ, Rainville J, Li L, Suri P (2012) Prevalence of anatomic impediments to interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:339–343PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hameed F, Hunter DJ, Rainville J, Li L, Suri P (2012) Prevalence of anatomic impediments to interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:339–343PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chang AL, Schoenfeld AH, Brook AL, Miller TS (2013) Radiation dose for 345 CT-guided interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1882–1886PubMedCrossRef Chang AL, Schoenfeld AH, Brook AL, Miller TS (2013) Radiation dose for 345 CT-guided interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1882–1886PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Artner J (2012) Effective dose of CT-guided epidural and periradicular injections of the lumbar spine: a retrospective study. Open Orthop J 6:357–361PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Artner J (2012) Effective dose of CT-guided epidural and periradicular injections of the lumbar spine: a retrospective study. Open Orthop J 6:357–361PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hoang JK, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G et al (2011) Radiation dose exposure for lumbar spine epidural steroid injections: a comparison of conventional fluoroscopy data and CT fluoroscopy techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:778–782PubMedCrossRef Hoang JK, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G et al (2011) Radiation dose exposure for lumbar spine epidural steroid injections: a comparison of conventional fluoroscopy data and CT fluoroscopy techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:778–782PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sarti M, Brehmer WP, Gay SB (2012) Low-dose techniques in CT-guided interventions. Radiographics 32:1109–1119PubMedCrossRef Sarti M, Brehmer WP, Gay SB (2012) Low-dose techniques in CT-guided interventions. Radiographics 32:1109–1119PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Paik NC, Lim CS, Jang HS (2013) Numeric and morphological verification of lumbosacral segments in 8280 consecutive patients. Spine 38:E573–E578PubMedCrossRef Paik NC, Lim CS, Jang HS (2013) Numeric and morphological verification of lumbosacral segments in 8280 consecutive patients. Spine 38:E573–E578PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, Bruesewitz MR, McCollough CH (2008) CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics 28:245–253PubMedCrossRef Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, Bruesewitz MR, McCollough CH (2008) CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics 28:245–253PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gary MF (2011) CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 259:311–316PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gary MF (2011) CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 259:311–316PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leng S, Christner JA, Carlson SK et al (2011) Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W97–W103PubMedCrossRef Leng S, Christner JA, Carlson SK et al (2011) Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W97–W103PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2010) Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:881–889PubMedCrossRef Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2010) Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:881–889PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim S, Toncheva G, Anderson-Evans C, Huh BK, Gray L, Yoshizumi T (2009) Kerma area product method for effective dose estimation during lumbar epidural steroid injection procedures: phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1726–1730PubMedCrossRef Kim S, Toncheva G, Anderson-Evans C, Huh BK, Gray L, Yoshizumi T (2009) Kerma area product method for effective dose estimation during lumbar epidural steroid injection procedures: phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1726–1730PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Report No. 160—ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Report No. 160—ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda
15.
go back to reference Schauberger JS, Kranz PG, Choudhury KR, Eastwood JD, Gray L, Hoang JK (2012) CT-guided lumbar nerve root injections: are we using the correct radiation dose settings? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1855–1859PubMedCrossRef Schauberger JS, Kranz PG, Choudhury KR, Eastwood JD, Gray L, Hoang JK (2012) CT-guided lumbar nerve root injections: are we using the correct radiation dose settings? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1855–1859PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pajunen P, Rissanen H, Laaksonen MA, Heliövaara M, Reunanen A, Knekt P (2013) Sagittal abdominal diameter as a new predictor for incident diabetes. Diabetes Care 36:283–288PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pajunen P, Rissanen H, Laaksonen MA, Heliövaara M, Reunanen A, Knekt P (2013) Sagittal abdominal diameter as a new predictor for incident diabetes. Diabetes Care 36:283–288PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ohrvall M, Berglund L, Vessby B (2000) Sagittal abdominal diameter compared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24:497–501PubMedCrossRef Ohrvall M, Berglund L, Vessby B (2000) Sagittal abdominal diameter compared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24:497–501PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sullivan WJ, Willick SE, Chira-Adisai W et al (2000) Incidence of intravascular uptake in lumbar spinal injection procedures. Spine 25:481–486PubMedCrossRef Sullivan WJ, Willick SE, Chira-Adisai W et al (2000) Incidence of intravascular uptake in lumbar spinal injection procedures. Spine 25:481–486PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Manchikanti L, Malla Y, Wargo BW, Cash KA, Pampati V, Fellows B (2012) A prospective evaluation of complications of 10,000 fluoroscopically directed epidural injections. Pain Physician 15:131–140PubMed Manchikanti L, Malla Y, Wargo BW, Cash KA, Pampati V, Fellows B (2012) A prospective evaluation of complications of 10,000 fluoroscopically directed epidural injections. Pain Physician 15:131–140PubMed
Metadata
Title
Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection by Minimizing Preliminary Planning Imaging
Author
Nam Chull Paik
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3245-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

European Radiology 9/2014 Go to the issue