Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Commentary

(R)evolution: toward a new paradigm of policy and patient advocacy for expanded access to experimental treatments

Author: Melissa Hogan

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

In life-threatening conditions such as cancer and rare diseases, where there is no cure and no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy, patients sometimes seek access to an unapproved, experimental therapy through expanded access programs as their last, best hope for treatment to save their lives. Since the 1980s, the policies and the practice of expanded access have evolved, but a common challenge remains that there is no obligation, and often little incentive, for manufacturers to offer expanded access programs, especially for individual patients. In recent years, online campaigns seeking access to an experimental therapy have become more common, paralleling growth in and representing an intersection of social media, digital health, and patient advocacy.
Mackey and Schoenfeld have examined the evolution of expanded access policy, practice, and trends, as well as case studies of online campaigns to access experimental therapies, to arrive at several recommendations for the future of expanded access. This commentary puts their paper in context, examines their recommendations, and suggests further reforms.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mackey TK, Schoenfeld VJ. Going “social” to access experimental and potentially life-saving treatment: an assessment of the policy and online patient advocacy environment for expanded access. BMC Med. 2016;14:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mackey TK, Schoenfeld VJ. Going “social” to access experimental and potentially life-saving treatment: an assessment of the policy and online patient advocacy environment for expanded access. BMC Med. 2016;14:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007), cert denied 552 U.S. 1159 (2008). Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007), cert denied 552 U.S. 1159 (2008).
8.
go back to reference de Bronkart D. From patient centred to people powered: autonomy on the rise. BMJ. 2015;350:h148.CrossRef de Bronkart D. From patient centred to people powered: autonomy on the rise. BMJ. 2015;350:h148.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
(R)evolution: toward a new paradigm of policy and patient advocacy for expanded access to experimental treatments
Author
Melissa Hogan
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0586-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue