Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Antibiotic | Study protocol

Are preoperative oral antibiotics effective in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery? Study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled study

Authors: Rui Qi Gao, Wei Dong Wang, Peng Fei Yu, Zhen Chang Mo, Dan Hong Dong, Xi Sheng Yang, Xiao Hua Li, Gang Ji

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The optimal preoperative preparation for elective colorectal cancer surgery has been debated in academic circles for decades. Previously, several expert teams have conducted studies on whether preoperative mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, such as surgical site infections and anastomotic leakage. Most of the results of these studies have suggested that preoperative mechanical bowel preparation for elective colon surgery has no significant effect on the occurrence of surgical site infections and anastomotic leakage.

Methods/design

This study will examine whether oral antibiotic bowel preparation (OABP) influences the incidence of anastomotic leakage after surgery in a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial that will enrol 1500 patients who require colon surgery. The primary endpoint, incidence of anastomotic leakage, is based on 2.3% in the OABP ± mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) group in the study by Morris et al. Patients will be randomized (1:1) into two groups: the test group will be given antibiotics (both neomycin 1 g and metronidazole 0.9 g) the day before surgery, and the control group will not receive any special intestinal preparation before surgery, including oral antibiotics or mechanical intestinal preparation. All study-related clinical data, such as general patient information, past medical history, laboratory examination, imaging results, and surgery details, will be recorded before surgery and during the time of hospitalization. The occurrence of postoperative fistulas, including anastomotic leakage, will be recorded as the main severe postoperative adverse event and will represent the primary endpoint.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics approval was obtained from the Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials (ChiECRCT20200173). The results of this study will be disseminated at several research conferences and as published articles in peer-reviewed journals. Protocol was revised on November 22, 2021, version 4.0.

Trial registration

ChiCTR2000035550​. Registered on 13 Aug 2020.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bellows CF, Mills KT, Kelly TN, Gagliardi G. Combination of oral non-absorbable and intravenous antibiotics versus intravenous antibiotics alone in the prevention of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):385–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0714-4. Epub 2011 Jul 23. PMID: 21785981.CrossRefPubMed Bellows CF, Mills KT, Kelly TN, Gagliardi G. Combination of oral non-absorbable and intravenous antibiotics versus intravenous antibiotics alone in the prevention of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):385–95. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10151-011-0714-4. Epub 2011 Jul 23. PMID: 21785981.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Miettinen RP, Laitinen ST, Mäkelä JT, Pääkkönen ME. Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(5):669–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235585. discussion 675–7. PMID: 10826429. Miettinen RP, Laitinen ST, Mäkelä JT, Pääkkönen ME. Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(5):669–75. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​BF02235585. discussion 675–7. PMID: 10826429.
7.
go back to reference Vadhwana B, Pouzi A, Surjus Kaneta G, Reid V, Claxton D, Pyne L, et al. Preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation in elective resectional colorectal surgery reduces rates of surgical site infections: a single-centre experience with a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102(2):133–40. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2019.0117. Epub 2019 Sep 11. PMID: 31508999; PMCID: PMC6996415. Vadhwana B, Pouzi A, Surjus Kaneta G, Reid V, Claxton D, Pyne L, et al. Preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation in elective resectional colorectal surgery reduces rates of surgical site infections: a single-centre experience with a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102(2):133–40. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1308/​rcsann.​2019.​0117. Epub 2019 Sep 11. PMID: 31508999; PMCID: PMC6996415.
8.
go back to reference Migaly J, Bafford AC, Francone TD, Gaertner WB, Eskicioglu C, Bordeianou L, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Bowel Preparation in Elective Colon and Rectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001238. Erratum in: Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Oct;62(10):e436. PMID: 30531263. Migaly J, Bafford AC, Francone TD, Gaertner WB, Eskicioglu C, Bordeianou L, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Bowel Preparation in Elective Colon and Rectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(1):3–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​DCR.​0000000000001238​. Erratum in: Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Oct;62(10):e436. PMID: 30531263.
9.
go back to reference Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, et al. Solomkin JS; WHO Guidelines Development Group. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e276–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X. Epub 2016 Nov 2. PMID: 27816413. Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, et al. Solomkin JS; WHO Guidelines Development Group. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e276–87. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1473-3099(16)30398-X. Epub 2016 Nov 2. PMID: 27816413.
10.
go back to reference NICE Guideline Updates Team (UK). Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2019. PMID: 31211539. NICE Guideline Updates Team (UK). Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2019. PMID: 31211539.
Metadata
Title
Are preoperative oral antibiotics effective in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery? Study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled study
Authors
Rui Qi Gao
Wei Dong Wang
Peng Fei Yu
Zhen Chang Mo
Dan Hong Dong
Xi Sheng Yang
Xiao Hua Li
Gang Ji
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06235-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue