Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2008

01-12-2008 | Perspectives

Publication Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies in Health Care: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project

Authors: Frank Davidoff, MD, Paul Batalden, MD, David Stevens, MD, Greg Ogrinc, MD, MS, Susan Mooney, MD, MS, for the SQUIRE development group

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

In 2005 we published draft guidelines for reporting studies of quality improvement interventions as the initial step in a consensus process for development of a more definitive version. The current article contains the revised version, which we refer to as SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence). We describe the consensus process, which included informal feedback, formal written commentaries, input from publication guideline developers, review of the literature on the epistemology of improvement and on methods for evaluating complex social programs, and a meeting of stakeholders for critical review of the guidelines’ content and wording, followed by commentary on sequential versions from an expert consultant group. Finally, we examine major differences between SQUIRE and the initial draft, and consider limitations of and unresolved questions about SQUIRE; we also describe ancillary supporting documents and alternative versions under development, and plans for dissemination, testing, and further development of SQUIRE.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:319–25.PubMedCrossRef Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:319–25.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Janisse T. A next step: reviewer feedback on quality improvement publication guidelines. Permanente Journal. 2007;11:1. Janisse T. A next step: reviewer feedback on quality improvement publication guidelines. Permanente Journal. 2007;11:1.
5.
6.
go back to reference Thomson RG. Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement? Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:317–8.PubMedCrossRef Thomson RG. Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement? Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:317–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chin MH, Chien AT. Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:79–80.PubMedCrossRef Chin MH, Chien AT. Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:79–80.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Baker GR. Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:150–1.PubMedCrossRef Baker GR. Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:150–1.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pronovost P, Wachter R. Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:152–3.PubMedCrossRef Pronovost P, Wachter R. Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:152–3.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gawande A. The checklist. The New Yorker. December 10, 2007, pp. 86–95. Gawande A. The checklist. The New Yorker. December 10, 2007, pp. 86–95.
11.
go back to reference Rennie D. Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers. JAMA. 1995;273:1054–5.PubMedCrossRef Rennie D. Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers. JAMA. 1995;273:1054–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Williams JW, Holleman JR, Samsa GP, Simel DL. Randomized controlled trial of 3 vs 10 days of timethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for acute maxillary sinusitis. JAMA. 1995;273:1015–21.PubMedCrossRef Williams JW, Holleman JR, Samsa GP, Simel DL. Randomized controlled trial of 3 vs 10 days of timethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for acute maxillary sinusitis. JAMA. 1995;273:1015–21.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2002. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2002.
15.
go back to reference Day RA. The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRaD format. J Am Med Writ Assoc. 1989;4:16–8. Day RA. The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRaD format. J Am Med Writ Assoc. 1989;4:16–8.
16.
go back to reference Huth EJ. The research paper: general principles for structure and content. In Writing and Publishing in Medicine, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1999, pp. 63–73. Huth EJ. The research paper: general principles for structure and content. In Writing and Publishing in Medicine, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1999, pp. 63–73.
17.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Enkin MW. Randomized Controlled Trials. Questions, Answers, and Musings. 2London: Blackwell Publishing/BMJ Books; 2007. Jadad AR, Enkin MW. Randomized Controlled Trials. Questions, Answers, and Musings. 2London: Blackwell Publishing/BMJ Books; 2007.
18.
go back to reference Batalden P, Davidoff F. Teaching quality improvement. The devil is in the details. JAMA. 2007;298:1059–61.PubMedCrossRef Batalden P, Davidoff F. Teaching quality improvement. The devil is in the details. JAMA. 2007;298:1059–61.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kolb DA. Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.
20.
go back to reference Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10Suppl 121–34.PubMedCrossRef Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10Suppl 121–34.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997.
22.
go back to reference Evaluation for the 21st Century. In: E Chelimsky, William Shadish, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997. Evaluation for the 21st Century. In: E Chelimsky, William Shadish, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997.
23.
go back to reference Health Care Quality Improvement: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. In: Jennings B, Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, eds. Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center; 2007. Health Care Quality Improvement: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. In: Jennings B, Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, eds. Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center; 2007.
24.
go back to reference Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: What would succesful reform of medicine look like? In: Forest PG, McKintosh K, Marchilden G, eds. Health Care Services and the Process of Change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004. Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: What would succesful reform of medicine look like? In: Forest PG, McKintosh K, Marchilden G, eds. Health Care Services and the Process of Change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004.
25.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, for the STROBE initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, for the STROBE initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.
26.
go back to reference Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Estrada C, et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; Supplement, in press. Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Estrada C, et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; Supplement, in press.
27.
go back to reference Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Goetzsche PC, Lang T, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–94.PubMed Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Goetzsche PC, Lang T, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–94.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gastonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Lijmer JG. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7–18.PubMedCrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gastonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Lijmer JG. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7–18.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche P, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, for the STROBE initiative, et al.. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:W–164. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche P, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, for the STROBE initiative, et al.. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:W–164.
30.
go back to reference Keech A, Gebski V, Pike R. Interpreting and Reporting Clinical Trials. A Guide to the CONSORT Statement and the Principles of Randomized Trials. Sydney: Australian Medical Publishing Company; 2007. Keech A, Gebski V, Pike R. Interpreting and Reporting Clinical Trials. A Guide to the CONSORT Statement and the Principles of Randomized Trials. Sydney: Australian Medical Publishing Company; 2007.
31.
go back to reference Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185:263–7.PubMed Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185:263–7.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1996–9.PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1996–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Publication Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies in Health Care: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project
Authors
Frank Davidoff, MD
Paul Batalden, MD
David Stevens, MD
Greg Ogrinc, MD, MS
Susan Mooney, MD, MS
for the SQUIRE development group
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0797-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2008 Go to the issue

Reflection

Two Deaths

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.