Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Public Health | Research article

Public health practitioner perspectives on dealing with measles outbreaks if high anti-vaccination sentiment is present

Authors: Penelope Robinson, Kerrie Wiley, Chris Degeling

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Communities with low vaccination rates are at greater risk during outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases. Most Australian parents support vaccines, but some refuse and are often judged harshly by their community, especially during an outbreak. We sought the perspectives of Australian public health experts on the key issues faced when managing a measles outbreak in an area with high anti-vaccination sentiment.

Methods

A measles outbreak scenario formed the basis of a 3-round modified Delphi process to identify key practitioner concerns in relation to parents/carers who don’t follow the recommended vaccination schedule. We surveyed a range of professionals in the field: policymakers, infectious disease experts, immunisation program staff, and others involved in delivering childhood vaccinations, to identify key priorities when responding to an outbreak in a community with low vaccination coverage.

Results

Findings indicate that responses to measles outbreaks in communities with high anti-vaccination sentiment are motivated by concerns about the potential for a much larger outbreak event. The highest operational priority is to isolate infected children. The two most highly ranked practical issues are mistrust from non-vaccinating members of the local region and combatting misinformation about vaccines. Trying to change minds of such individuals is not a priority during an outbreak, nor is vaccinating their children. Using media and social media to provide information about the outbreak and measures the public can take to limit the spread of the disease was a focus.

Conclusions

Our findings provide a deeper understanding of the challenges faced during an outbreak and priorities for communicating with communities where there is a high level of anti-vaccination sentiment. In the context of a global pandemic, the results of this study also have implications for managing public health responses to community transmission of SARS-CoV-2, as COVID-19 vaccines becomes widely available.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
5.
go back to reference Communicable Diseases Network Authority. CDNA National Guidelines for Public Health Units. 7 May 2019 ed 2019. Communicable Diseases Network Authority. CDNA National Guidelines for Public Health Units. 7 May 2019 ed 2019.
12.
go back to reference Hausman BL. Anti/Vax: Reframing the Vaccination Controversy. In: The culture and politics of health care work. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2019. Hausman BL. Anti/Vax: Reframing the Vaccination Controversy. In: The culture and politics of health care work. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2019.
14.
go back to reference Blume SS. Immunization : how vaccines became controversial. London: Reaktion Books Ltd; 2017. Blume SS. Immunization : how vaccines became controversial. London: Reaktion Books Ltd; 2017.
19.
22.
go back to reference Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Schulz WS, Chaudhuri M, Zhou Y, Dube E, Schuster M, MacDonald N, Wilson R, SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Measuring vaccine hesitancy: the development of a survey tool. Vaccine 2015;33(34):4165–4175. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Schulz WS, Chaudhuri M, Zhou Y, Dube E, Schuster M, MacDonald N, Wilson R, SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Measuring vaccine hesitancy: the development of a survey tool. Vaccine 2015;33(34):4165–4175. doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​vaccine.​2015.​04.​037.
24.
26.
27.
30.
go back to reference Ziglio E. The Delphi method and its contribution to decision-making. In: Adler M, Ziglio E, editors. Gazing into the oracle : the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1996. Ziglio E. The Delphi method and its contribution to decision-making. In: Adler M, Ziglio E, editors. Gazing into the oracle : the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1996.
31.
go back to reference Degeling C, Johnson J, Gilbert G, L. Perspectives of Australian policy-makers on the potential benefits and risks of technologically enhanced communicable disease surveillance – a modified Delphi survey. Health Res Policy Syst 2019;17(1):1–11. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0440-3. Degeling C, Johnson J, Gilbert G, L. Perspectives of Australian policy-makers on the potential benefits and risks of technologically enhanced communicable disease surveillance – a modified Delphi survey. Health Res Policy Syst 2019;17(1):1–11. doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12961-019-0440-3.
33.
go back to reference Kaufman J, Ryan R, Lewin S, Bosch-Capblanch X, Glenton C, Cliff J, Oyo-Ita A, Muloliwa AM, Oku A, Ames H, Rada G, Cartier Y, Hill S Identification of preliminary core outcome domains for communication about childhood vaccination: an online Delphi survey. Vaccine 2018;36(44):6520–6528. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.027. Kaufman J, Ryan R, Lewin S, Bosch-Capblanch X, Glenton C, Cliff J, Oyo-Ita A, Muloliwa AM, Oku A, Ames H, Rada G, Cartier Y, Hill S Identification of preliminary core outcome domains for communication about childhood vaccination: an online Delphi survey. Vaccine 2018;36(44):6520–6528. doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​vaccine.​2017.​08.​027.
35.
go back to reference Boylan S, Sainsbury E, Thow A-M, Degeling C, Craven L, Stellmach D et al. A healthy, sustainable and safe food system: examining the perceptions and role of the Australian policy actor using a Delphi survey. Public Health Nutrition. 2019;22(16):2921–2930. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898001900185X. Boylan S, Sainsbury E, Thow A-M, Degeling C, Craven L, Stellmach D et al. A healthy, sustainable and safe food system: examining the perceptions and role of the Australian policy actor using a Delphi survey. Public Health Nutrition. 2019;22(16):2921–2930. doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1017/​S136898001900185​X.
40.
go back to reference Hansen, J. "Our hot spots for deadly measles", Daily Telegraph, April 7, 2019, page 22, Sydney, Australia. Hansen, J. "Our hot spots for deadly measles", Daily Telegraph, April 7, 2019, page 22, Sydney, Australia.
42.
go back to reference Helps C, Leask J, Barclay L, Carter S. Understanding non-vaccinating parents’ views to inform and improve clinical encounters: a qualitative study in an Australian community. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5). doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026299. Helps C, Leask J, Barclay L, Carter S. Understanding non-vaccinating parents’ views to inform and improve clinical encounters: a qualitative study in an Australian community. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5). doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2018-026299.
43.
45.
go back to reference Steffens MS, Dunn AG, Wiley KE, Leask J. How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: a qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7659-3. Steffens MS, Dunn AG, Wiley KE, Leask J. How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: a qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1):1–12. doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12889-019-7659-3.
47.
go back to reference Randall S, Leask J, Robinson P, Danchin M, Kinnersley P, Witteman H, Trevena L, Berry N Underpinning of the sharing knowledge about immunisation (SKAI) communication approach: a qualitative study using recorded observations. Patient Educ Couns 2020;103(6):1118–1124. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.014. Randall S, Leask J, Robinson P, Danchin M, Kinnersley P, Witteman H, Trevena L, Berry N Underpinning of the sharing knowledge about immunisation (SKAI) communication approach: a qualitative study using recorded observations. Patient Educ Couns 2020;103(6):1118–1124. doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2019.​12.​014.
48.
go back to reference Berry NJ, Danchin M, Trevena L, Witteman HO, Kinnersley P, Snelling T, Robinson P, Leask J Sharing knowledge about immunisation (SKAI): an exploration of parents' communication needs to inform development of a clinical communication support intervention. Vaccine 2018. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.077, 36, 44, 6480, 6490. Berry NJ, Danchin M, Trevena L, Witteman HO, Kinnersley P, Snelling T, Robinson P, Leask J Sharing knowledge about immunisation (SKAI): an exploration of parents' communication needs to inform development of a clinical communication support intervention. Vaccine 2018. doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​vaccine.​2017.​10.​077, 36, 44, 6480, 6490.
51.
52.
go back to reference Attwell K, Meyer SB, Ward PR. The social basis of vaccine questioning and refusal: a qualitative study employing Bourdieu’s concepts of ‘capitals’ and ‘habitus. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15(5):1044. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15051044. Attwell K, Meyer SB, Ward PR. The social basis of vaccine questioning and refusal: a qualitative study employing Bourdieu’s concepts of ‘capitals’ and ‘habitus. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15(5):1044. doi:https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​ijerph15051044.
Metadata
Title
Public health practitioner perspectives on dealing with measles outbreaks if high anti-vaccination sentiment is present
Authors
Penelope Robinson
Kerrie Wiley
Chris Degeling
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10604-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue