Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 9/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Paper

Public attitudes towards people with depression in times of uncertainty: results from three population surveys in Germany

Authors: Matthias C. Angermeyer, Herbert Matschinger, Georg Schomerus

Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The recent increase of so-called precarious work conditions plus the current financial crisis have led to a growing sense of uncertainty among the public. This may have repercussions on attitudes towards people with mental illness. Particularly, the public may have become more reluctant to support access to work for these people.

Methods

In 1990, 2001 and 2011, population surveys were conducted in the “old” states of Germany, using the same sampling procedure, interview mode and measures. Within the context of a fully structured interview respondents were presented a case-vignette depicting a person with symptoms of depression. They were then asked how willing they would be to accept the person in the vignette in various social relationships.

Results

While the German public’s unwillingness to recommend an individual with depression for a job remained unchanged during the 1990s, it increased significantly during the subsequent decade. By contrast, in all other social relationships studied, no increase of the desire for social distance could be observed during this time period. The trend towards withholding access to jobs was most pronounced among employed respondents.

Conclusions

The results of our study underline the importance of macro-social factors for the discrimination of people with mental illness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Statistisches Bundesamt (2009) Statistisches Jahrbuch für die Bundesrepublik 2009. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden Statistisches Bundesamt (2009) Statistisches Jahrbuch für die Bundesrepublik 2009. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden
2.
go back to reference Böhnke P (2006) Marginalisierung und Verunsicherung. Ein empirischer Beitrag zur Exklusionsdebatte [Marginalization and uncertainty. An empirical contribution to the debate on exclusion]. In: Bude H, Willisch A (eds) Das Problem der Exklusion. Ausgegrenzte, Entbehrliche, Überflüssige [The problem of exclusion. Excluded, dispensable, useless]. Hamburger Edition, Hamburg, p 97–120 Böhnke P (2006) Marginalisierung und Verunsicherung. Ein empirischer Beitrag zur Exklusionsdebatte [Marginalization and uncertainty. An empirical contribution to the debate on exclusion]. In: Bude H, Willisch A (eds) Das Problem der Exklusion. Ausgegrenzte, Entbehrliche, Überflüssige [The problem of exclusion. Excluded, dispensable, useless]. Hamburger Edition, Hamburg, p 97–120
3.
go back to reference Weibmann M, Decker O (2010) Prekarisierung und Krise [Precariousness and crisis]. In: Decker O, Weibmann M, Kiess J, Brähler E (eds) Die Mitte in der Krise. Rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland 2010 [The middle in crisis. Right-wing orientations in Germany 2010]. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Berlin Weibmann M, Decker O (2010) Prekarisierung und Krise [Precariousness and crisis]. In: Decker O, Weibmann M, Kiess J, Brähler E (eds) Die Mitte in der Krise. Rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland 2010 [The middle in crisis. Right-wing orientations in Germany 2010]. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Berlin
4.
go back to reference Mansel J, Christ O, Heitmeyer W (2012) Der Effekt der Prekarisierung auf fremdenfeindliche Einstellungen. Ergebnisse aus einem Drei-Wellen-Panel und zehn jährlichen Surveys [The effect of precariousness on xenophobic attitudes. Results from a three-wave panel and ten yearly surveys]. In: Heitmeyer W (ed) Deutsche Zustände. Folge 10 [German conditions. 10th issue]. Suhrkamp Verlag Berlin (pp 105–128) Mansel J, Christ O, Heitmeyer W (2012) Der Effekt der Prekarisierung auf fremdenfeindliche Einstellungen. Ergebnisse aus einem Drei-Wellen-Panel und zehn jährlichen Surveys [The effect of precariousness on xenophobic attitudes. Results from a three-wave panel and ten yearly surveys]. In: Heitmeyer W (ed) Deutsche Zustände. Folge 10 [German conditions. 10th issue]. Suhrkamp Verlag Berlin (pp 105–128)
5.
go back to reference Heitmeyer W (2010) Disparate Entwicklungen in Krisenzeiten, Entsolidarisierung und Gruppenbezogene Menschenfeindlichkeit [Disparate developments in times of crisis. Loss of solidarity and group-related misanthropy]. In: Heitmeyer W (ed) Deutsche Zustände. Folge 9 [German conditions. 9th issue]. Suhrkamp Verlag, Berlin (pp 13–33) Heitmeyer W (2010) Disparate Entwicklungen in Krisenzeiten, Entsolidarisierung und Gruppenbezogene Menschenfeindlichkeit [Disparate developments in times of crisis. Loss of solidarity and group-related misanthropy]. In: Heitmeyer W (ed) Deutsche Zustände. Folge 9 [German conditions. 9th issue]. Suhrkamp Verlag, Berlin (pp 13–33)
6.
go back to reference Phelan JC, Link BG, Dovidio JF (2008) Stigma and prejudice: one animal or two? Soc Sci Med 67:358–367PubMedCrossRef Phelan JC, Link BG, Dovidio JF (2008) Stigma and prejudice: one animal or two? Soc Sci Med 67:358–367PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Angermeyer M, Matschinger H (2004) Public attitudes to people with depression: have there been any changes over the last decade? J Affect Disord 83:177–182PubMedCrossRef Angermeyer M, Matschinger H (2004) Public attitudes to people with depression: have there been any changes over the last decade? J Affect Disord 83:177–182PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Heitmeyer W (2012) Gruppenbezogene Menschenfeindlichkeit (GMF) in einem entsicherten Jahrzehnt [Group-related misanthropy in a decade of uncertainty] In: Heitmeyer W (ed) Deutsche Zustände. Folge 10 [German conditions. 10th issue]. Suhrkamp Verlag, Berlin (pp 15–41) Heitmeyer W (2012) Gruppenbezogene Menschenfeindlichkeit (GMF) in einem entsicherten Jahrzehnt [Group-related misanthropy in a decade of uncertainty] In: Heitmeyer W (ed) Deutsche Zustände. Folge 10 [German conditions. 10th issue]. Suhrkamp Verlag, Berlin (pp 15–41)
9.
go back to reference Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (1997) Social distance towards the mentally ill: results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. Psychol Med 27:131–141PubMedCrossRef Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (1997) Social distance towards the mentally ill: results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. Psychol Med 27:131–141PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Link BG, Cullen FT, Frank J, Wozniak JF (1987) The social rejection of former mental patients: understanding why labels matter. Am J Sociol 92:1461–1500CrossRef Link BG, Cullen FT, Frank J, Wozniak JF (1987) The social rejection of former mental patients: understanding why labels matter. Am J Sociol 92:1461–1500CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Long SJ, Freese J (2006) Regression models for categorical dependent variable using stata (2nd ed). Stata Press, College Station, TX Long SJ, Freese J (2006) Regression models for categorical dependent variable using stata (2nd ed). Stata Press, College Station, TX
12.
go back to reference Xu J, Long SJ (2005) Confidence intervals for predicted outcomes in regression models for categorical outcomes. Stata J 5:537–559 Xu J, Long SJ (2005) Confidence intervals for predicted outcomes in regression models for categorical outcomes. Stata J 5:537–559
13.
go back to reference Statacorp (2011) Stata Statistical Software. Release 12. Stata Press, College Station, TX Statacorp (2011) Stata Statistical Software. Release 12. Stata Press, College Station, TX
14.
go back to reference Reavley NJ, Jorm AF (2012) Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: Changes in Australia over 8 years. Psychiatr Res Epub ahead of print Reavley NJ, Jorm AF (2012) Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: Changes in Australia over 8 years. Psychiatr Res Epub ahead of print
15.
go back to reference WonPat-Borja AJ, Yang LH, Link BG, Phelan JC (2012) Eugenics, genetics, and mental illness stigma in Chinese Americans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47:145–156PubMedCrossRef WonPat-Borja AJ, Yang LH, Link BG, Phelan JC (2012) Eugenics, genetics, and mental illness stigma in Chinese Americans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47:145–156PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yap MBH, Wright A (2011) Jorm AF (2011) The influence of stigma on young people’s help-seeking intentions and beliefs about the helpfulness of various sources of help. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:1257–1265PubMedCrossRef Yap MBH, Wright A (2011) Jorm AF (2011) The influence of stigma on young people’s help-seeking intentions and beliefs about the helpfulness of various sources of help. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:1257–1265PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Barke A, Nyarko S, Klecha D (2011) The stigma of mental illness in Southern Ghana: attitudes of the urban population and patients’ views. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:1191–1202PubMedCrossRef Barke A, Nyarko S, Klecha D (2011) The stigma of mental illness in Southern Ghana: attitudes of the urban population and patients’ views. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:1191–1202PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Leiderman EA, Vazquez G, Berizzo C, Bonifacio A, Bruscoli N et al (2011) Public knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards patients with schizophrenia: Buenos Aires. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:281–290PubMedCrossRef Leiderman EA, Vazquez G, Berizzo C, Bonifacio A, Bruscoli N et al (2011) Public knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards patients with schizophrenia: Buenos Aires. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:281–290PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Corrigan PW, Markowitz FE, Watson AC (2004) Structural levels of mental illness stigma and discrimination. Schizophr Bull 30:481–491PubMedCrossRef Corrigan PW, Markowitz FE, Watson AC (2004) Structural levels of mental illness stigma and discrimination. Schizophr Bull 30:481–491PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2004) The public’s preferences concerning the allocation of financial resources to health care: results from a representative population survey in Germany. Eur Psychiatry 19:478–482PubMedCrossRef Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2004) The public’s preferences concerning the allocation of financial resources to health care: results from a representative population survey in Germany. Eur Psychiatry 19:478–482PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schomerus G, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2006) Preferences of the public regarding cut-backs of the expenditures for patient care: are there indications for the discrimination of people with mental disorders? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:369–377PubMedCrossRef Schomerus G, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2006) Preferences of the public regarding cut-backs of the expenditures for patient care: are there indications for the discrimination of people with mental disorders? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:369–377PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Beck M, Dietrich S, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2003) Alcoholism: low standing with the public? Attitudes towards spending financial resources on medical care and research on alcoholism. Alcohol Alcohol 38:602–605PubMedCrossRef Beck M, Dietrich S, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2003) Alcoholism: low standing with the public? Attitudes towards spending financial resources on medical care and research on alcoholism. Alcohol Alcohol 38:602–605PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Public attitudes towards people with depression in times of uncertainty: results from three population surveys in Germany
Authors
Matthias C. Angermeyer
Herbert Matschinger
Georg Schomerus
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0933-7954
Electronic ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0618-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 9/2013 Go to the issue