Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2016

Open Access 01-08-2016 | Original Research Article

Psychometric Evaluation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptom Diary for Varicose Veins: VVSymQ® Instrument

Authors: David D. I. Wright, Jean Paty, Diane M. Turner-Bowker, Andrew Bradbury

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the VVSymQ® instrument, a new 5-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for symptoms of varicose veins.

Method

The VVSymQ® electronic daily diary was administered to outpatients who received routine treatment for varicose veins (N = 40). Compliance with diary administration and item score variability, reliability, construct validity, sensitivity to change, and clinically meaningful change were evaluated.

Results

Patients completed >97 % of scheduled diary assessments (at screening, baseline, and week 8). The VVSymQ® instrument captured patients’ pre-treatment symptoms (all VVSymQ® symptoms were endorsed by ≥75 % of patients at baseline), and the change post-treatment (mean change in score −6.1), with a large Cohen effect size (1.6). Test–retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.96); internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.76; baseline, week 8). VVSymQ® scores were more strongly associated with PRO scores that reflect symptoms and symptom impact (the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study—Quality of Life/Symptoms [VEINES-QOL/Sym] instrument and the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire [CIVIQ-20]) than with PRO scores that reflect appearance (the Patient Self-Assessment of Appearance of Visible Varicose Veins [PA-V3]) or clinician-reported outcome scores (the Clinical–Etiology–Anatomy–Pathophysiology [CEAP] Classification of Venous Disorders and Venous Clinical Severity Score [VCSS]), demonstrating construct validity. Patients reporting that symptoms were “moderately” or “much improved” on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) anchor (i.e., >97 % of patients) had mean improvements of −6.3 VVSymQ® points, while a cumulative distribution curve showed that 50 % of patients improved by ≥−5.8 points; thus, a score change of approximately −6 demonstrated a clinically meaningful change in this study. The clinically meaningful change in the VVSymQ® score was greater in patients with a greater baseline VVSymQ® symptom burden, and the VVSymQ® instrument captured clinically meaningful treatment benefit even in patients with a low baseline symptom burden.

Conclusion

The 5-item VVSymQ® instrument is a brief, psychometrically sound, useful tool for evaluating patient-reported varicose veins symptoms.
Footnotes
1
VVSymQ® is a registered trademark of Provensis Ltd., a BTG International group company.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15:175–84.CrossRefPubMed Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15:175–84.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Darvall KA, Bate GR, Adam DJ, Bradbury AW. Generic health-related quality of life is significantly worse in varicose vein patients with lower limb symptoms independent of CEAP clinical grade. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:341–4.CrossRefPubMed Darvall KA, Bate GR, Adam DJ, Bradbury AW. Generic health-related quality of life is significantly worse in varicose vein patients with lower limb symptoms independent of CEAP clinical grade. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:341–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kahn SR, M’Lan CE, Lamping DL, for the VEINES Study Group, et al. Relationship between clinical classification of chronic venous disease and patient-reported quality of life: results from an international cohort study. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:823–8. Kahn SR, M’Lan CE, Lamping DL, for the VEINES Study Group, et al. Relationship between clinical classification of chronic venous disease and patient-reported quality of life: results from an international cohort study. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:823–8.
4.
go back to reference Marston WA. Evaluation of varicose veins: what do the clinical signs and symptoms reveal about the underlying disease and need for intervention? Semin Vasc Surg. 2010;23:78–84.CrossRefPubMed Marston WA. Evaluation of varicose veins: what do the clinical signs and symptoms reveal about the underlying disease and need for intervention? Semin Vasc Surg. 2010;23:78–84.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Paty J. VVSymQ® score and patient profiles: interpreting a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for great saphenous vein incompetence (GSVI). Presented at the Society for Interventional Radiology 2014 annual meeting, San Diego, California, 22–27 Mar 2014. Paty J. VVSymQ® score and patient profiles: interpreting a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for great saphenous vein incompetence (GSVI). Presented at the Society for Interventional Radiology 2014 annual meeting, San Diego, California, 22–27 Mar 2014.
8.
go back to reference Lamping DL, Schroter S, Kurz X, et al. Evaluation of outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: development of a scientifically rigorous, patient-reported measure of symptoms and quality of life. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:410–9.CrossRefPubMed Lamping DL, Schroter S, Kurz X, et al. Evaluation of outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: development of a scientifically rigorous, patient-reported measure of symptoms and quality of life. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:410–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Guex JJ, Zimmet SE, Boussetta S, et al. Construction and validation of a patient-reported outcome dedicated to chronic venous disorders: SQOR-V (Specific Quality of Life and Outcome Response—Venous). J Mal Vasc. 2007;32(3):135–47.CrossRefPubMed Guex JJ, Zimmet SE, Boussetta S, et al. Construction and validation of a patient-reported outcome dedicated to chronic venous disorders: SQOR-V (Specific Quality of Life and Outcome Response—Venous). J Mal Vasc. 2007;32(3):135–47.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Launois R, Reboul-Marty J, Henry B. Construction and validation of a quality of life instrument in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:539–54.CrossRefPubMed Launois R, Reboul-Marty J, Henry B. Construction and validation of a quality of life instrument in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:539–54.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kahn SR, Lamping DL, Ducruet T, et al. VEINES-QOL/Sym instrument was a reliable and valid disease-specific quality of life measure for deep venous thrombosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1049–56.PubMed Kahn SR, Lamping DL, Ducruet T, et al. VEINES-QOL/Sym instrument was a reliable and valid disease-specific quality of life measure for deep venous thrombosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1049–56.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Norquist JM, Girman C, Fehnel S, DeMuro-Mercon C, Santanello N. Choice of recall period for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: criteria for consideration. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1013–20.CrossRefPubMed Norquist JM, Girman C, Fehnel S, DeMuro-Mercon C, Santanello N. Choice of recall period for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: criteria for consideration. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1013–20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther. 1996;18:979–92.CrossRefPubMed Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther. 1996;18:979–92.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl.):S125–37. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl.):S125–37.
17.
go back to reference Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1993. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1993.
18.
go back to reference Fleiss J. Reliability of measurement: the design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley; 1986. Fleiss J. Reliability of measurement: the design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley; 1986.
19.
go back to reference Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health. 2008;11:322–33.CrossRefPubMed Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health. 2008;11:322–33.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.PubMedPubMedCentral Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.
22.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, et al. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371–83.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, et al. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371–83.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hinchcliff M, Beaumont JL, Thavarajah K, et al. Validity of two new patient-reported outcome measures in systemic sclerosis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Health Profile and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Dyspnea short form. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:1620–8.CrossRef Hinchcliff M, Beaumont JL, Thavarajah K, et al. Validity of two new patient-reported outcome measures in systemic sclerosis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Health Profile and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Dyspnea short form. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:1620–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mazari FAK, Carradice D, Rahman MN, et al. An analysis of relationship between quality of life indices and clinical improvement following intervention in patients with intermittent claudication due to femoropopliteal disease. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:77–84.CrossRefPubMed Mazari FAK, Carradice D, Rahman MN, et al. An analysis of relationship between quality of life indices and clinical improvement following intervention in patients with intermittent claudication due to femoropopliteal disease. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:77–84.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Psychometric Evaluation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptom Diary for Varicose Veins: VVSymQ® Instrument
Authors
David D. I. Wright
Jean Paty
Diane M. Turner-Bowker
Andrew Bradbury
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0159-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.