Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Psychiatric Treatment | Study protocol

Evaluation of a flexible and integrative psychiatric care model in a department of child and adolescent psychiatry in Tübingen, Germany: study protocol (EVA_TIBAS)

Authors: Anne Neumann, Helene Hense, Fabian Baum, Roman Kliemt, Martin Seifert, Lorenz Harst, Denise Kubat, Birgit Maicher, Christopher Schrey, Jochen Schmitt, Andrea Pfennig, Ines Weinhold, Enno Swart, Bettina Soltmann

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Model projects for flexible and integrated treatment (FIT) in Germany aim at advancing the quality of care for people with mental disorders. A new FIT model project was established in 2017 at the Department of child and adolescent psychiatry (KJP) of the University Hospital Tübingen (Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, UKT). The study design of EVA_TIBAS presented here describes the evaluation of the FIT model project at the KJP of the UKT. This evaluation aims at quantifying the anticipated FIT model project changes, which are to improve patients’ cross-sectoral care at the same maximum cost as standard care.

Methods

EVA_TIBAS is a controlled cohort study using a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods. The FIT evaluation consists of three modules. In Module A, anonymized claims data of a statutory health insurance fund will be used to compare outcomes (duration of inpatient and day care psychiatric treatment, inpatient and day care psychiatric length of stay, outpatient psychiatric treatment in hospital, inpatient hospital readmission, emergency admission rate, direct medical costs) of patients treated in the model hospital with patients treated in structurally comparable control hospitals (estimated sample size = ca. 600 patients). In Module B, patient-reported outcomes (health related quality of life, symptom burden, return to psychosocial relationships (e.g. school, friends, hobbies), treatment satisfaction, societal costs) will be assessed quantitatively using validated questionnaires for the model and two control hospitals (estimated sample size = ca. 300 patients). A subsequent health economic evaluation will be based on cost-effectiveness analyses from both the insurance fund’s and the societal perspective. In Module C, about 30 semi-structured interviews will examine the quality of offer, effects and benefits of the service offered by the social service of the AOK Baden-Württemberg (for stabilizing the overall situation of care in the family) in the model hospital. A focus group discussion will address the quality of cooperation between employees of the university hospital and the social services.

Discussion

The results of this evaluation will be used to inform policy makers whether this FIT model project or aspects of it should be implemented into standard care.

Trial registration

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (ID: NCT04727359, date: 27 January 2021).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mauz E, Lange M, Houben R, Hoffmann R, Allen J, Gößwald A, et al. Cohort profile: KiGGs cohorot longitudinal study on the health of children, adolescents and young adults in Germany. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(2):375-k.CrossRef Mauz E, Lange M, Houben R, Hoffmann R, Allen J, Gößwald A, et al. Cohort profile: KiGGs cohorot longitudinal study on the health of children, adolescents and young adults in Germany. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(2):375-k.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Klipker K, Baumgarten F, Göbel K, Lampert T, Hölling H. Psychische Auffälligkeiten bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Querschnittergebnisse aus KiGGS Welle 2 und Trends. J Health Monit. 2018;3:37–45. Klipker K, Baumgarten F, Göbel K, Lampert T, Hölling H. Psychische Auffälligkeiten bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Querschnittergebnisse aus KiGGS Welle 2 und Trends. J Health Monit. 2018;3:37–45.
3.
go back to reference Harsch D, Hoffmann U. Vielfältige Versorgungsangebote. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2018;6:267–9. Harsch D, Hoffmann U. Vielfältige Versorgungsangebote. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2018;6:267–9.
4.
go back to reference Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Bettge S, Erhart M. Mental health of children and adolescents in Germany. Results from the BELLA study within the German health interview and examination survey for children and Adolescnets (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 2007;50(5-6):871–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-007-0250-6.CrossRef Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Bettge S, Erhart M. Mental health of children and adolescents in Germany. Results from the BELLA study within the German health interview and examination survey for children and Adolescnets (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 2007;50(5-6):871–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00103-007-0250-6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Plener PL, Straub J, Fegert M, Keller F. Treatment of mental diseases in children in German hospitals: analysis of frequencies in the years 2003 to 2012. Nervenheilkunde. 2015;34:18–23.CrossRef Plener PL, Straub J, Fegert M, Keller F. Treatment of mental diseases in children in German hospitals: analysis of frequencies in the years 2003 to 2012. Nervenheilkunde. 2015;34:18–23.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fegert JM. Versorgung psychisch kranker Kinder und Jugendlicher in Deutschland - Bestandsaufnahme und Bedarfsanalyse. Berlin: APK-Jahrestagung; 2018. Fegert JM. Versorgung psychisch kranker Kinder und Jugendlicher in Deutschland - Bestandsaufnahme und Bedarfsanalyse. Berlin: APK-Jahrestagung; 2018.
10.
go back to reference Fegert JM, Kölch M, Krüger U. Sachbericht: Versorgung psychische kranker Kinder und Jugendliche in Deutschland - Bestandsaufnahme und Bedarfsanalyse; 2017. Fegert JM, Kölch M, Krüger U. Sachbericht: Versorgung psychische kranker Kinder und Jugendliche in Deutschland - Bestandsaufnahme und Bedarfsanalyse; 2017.
11.
go back to reference Kliemt R, Häckl D. Anreize und Weiterentwicklungsperspektiven der Vergütung von Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik unter der Berücksichtigung von Modellprojekten. In: Klauber J, Geraedts M, Friedrich J, Wasem J, Beivers A, editors. Krankenhaus-Report 2020 - Finanzierung und Vergütung am Scheideweg. Berlin: Springer; 2020. p. 263–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60487-8_14.CrossRef Kliemt R, Häckl D. Anreize und Weiterentwicklungsperspektiven der Vergütung von Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik unter der Berücksichtigung von Modellprojekten. In: Klauber J, Geraedts M, Friedrich J, Wasem J, Beivers A, editors. Krankenhaus-Report 2020 - Finanzierung und Vergütung am Scheideweg. Berlin: Springer; 2020. p. 263–80. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-662-60487-8_​14.CrossRef
12.
16.
go back to reference Baum F, Schoffer O, Neumann A, Seifert M, Kliemt R, March S, et al. Effectiveness of Global Treatment Budgets for Patients With Mental Disorders—Claims Data Based Meta-Analysis of 13 Controlled Studies From Germany. Front. Psychiatry, 24 March 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00131. Baum F, Schoffer O, Neumann A, Seifert M, Kliemt R, March S, et al. Effectiveness of Global Treatment Budgets for Patients With Mental Disorders—Claims Data Based Meta-Analysis of 13 Controlled Studies From Germany. Front. Psychiatry, 24 March 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​fpsyt.​2020.​00131.
18.
go back to reference Bundesinstitut für Bau- S-uRIfRoB, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR)],. INKAR - Indikatoren und Karten zur Raum- und Stadtentwicklung Bonn2016 Available from: http://inkar.de/. Bundesinstitut für Bau- S-uRIfRoB, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR)],. INKAR - Indikatoren und Karten zur Raum- und Stadtentwicklung Bonn2016 Available from: http://​inkar.​de/​.
20.
go back to reference Petzold T, Neumann A, Seifert M, Kuster D, Pfennig A, Weiss J, et al. Identification of control hospitals for the implementation of the Nationwide and standardized evaluation of model projects according to section sign 64b SGB V: analysis of data from structured quality reports. Gesundheitswesen. 2019;81(1):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-116436.CrossRefPubMed Petzold T, Neumann A, Seifert M, Kuster D, Pfennig A, Weiss J, et al. Identification of control hospitals for the implementation of the Nationwide and standardized evaluation of model projects according to section sign 64b SGB V: analysis of data from structured quality reports. Gesundheitswesen. 2019;81(1):63–71. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0042-116436.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Neumann A, Baum F, Seifert M, Schoffer O, Kliemt R, March S, et al. Reduction of days in inpatient Care in Psychiatric Hospitals with flexible and integrated treatment for patient-centered care with a global budget - results with three-year follow-up from the evaluation study EVA64. Psychiatr Prax. 2021;48(3):127–34. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1274-3731.CrossRefPubMed Neumann A, Baum F, Seifert M, Schoffer O, Kliemt R, March S, et al. Reduction of days in inpatient Care in Psychiatric Hospitals with flexible and integrated treatment for patient-centered care with a global budget - results with three-year follow-up from the evaluation study EVA64. Psychiatr Prax. 2021;48(3):127–34. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​a-1274-3731.CrossRefPubMed
25.
27.
go back to reference Mattejat F, Remschmidt H. Assessing the quality of life of children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders--a review. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 1998;26(3):183–96.PubMed Mattejat F, Remschmidt H. Assessing the quality of life of children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders--a review. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 1998;26(3):183–96.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Kusch M, Hudde-Korte K, Knauer B. LARES-Geschwisterkinder. Validierung eines psychosozialen Screeninginstruments für Geschwister von Kindern mit besonderem Versorgungsbedarf; 2011. Kusch M, Hudde-Korte K, Knauer B. LARES-Geschwisterkinder. Validierung eines psychosozialen Screeninginstruments für Geschwister von Kindern mit besonderem Versorgungsbedarf; 2011.
34.
go back to reference Kullback S. Information theory and statistics. New York: Wiley; 1959. Kullback S. Information theory and statistics. New York: Wiley; 1959.
38.
go back to reference Gabrielova J, Veleminsky M Sr. Interdisciplinary collaboration between medical and non-medical professions in health and social care. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35(Suppl 1):59–66.PubMed Gabrielova J, Veleminsky M Sr. Interdisciplinary collaboration between medical and non-medical professions in health and social care. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35(Suppl 1):59–66.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken Weinheim: Beltz; 2010. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken Weinheim: Beltz; 2010.
41.
go back to reference Creamer EG. An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles | London New Delhi | Singapore | Washington DC | Melbourne: SAGE Publications; 2018.CrossRef Creamer EG. An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles | London New Delhi | Singapore | Washington DC | Melbourne: SAGE Publications; 2018.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference German Society for Epidemiology (DGEpi). Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP). 2004. German Society for Epidemiology (DGEpi). Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP). 2004.
45.
go back to reference Swart E, Bitzer E, Gothe H, Harling M, Hoffmann F, Horenkamp-Sonntag D, et al. STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen (STROSA) – ein konsentierter Berichtsstandard fürDeutschland, Version 2. Gesundheitswesen 2016;78(S 01): e145–60.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108647. Swart E, Bitzer E, Gothe H, Harling M, Hoffmann F, Horenkamp-Sonntag D, et al. STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen (STROSA) – ein konsentierter Berichtsstandard fürDeutschland, Version 2. Gesundheitswesen 2016;78(S 01): e145–60.https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0042-108647.
46.
go back to reference von der Schulenburg G, Greiner W, Jost F, Klusen N, Kubin M, Leidl R, et al. Deutsche Empfehlung zur gesundheitsökonomischen evaluation - dritte und aktualisierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens [German recommendations on health economic evaluation - third and updated version of the Hannover consensus]. Gesudh ökon Qual Manag. 2007;12(5):285–93. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-963505.CrossRef von der Schulenburg G, Greiner W, Jost F, Klusen N, Kubin M, Leidl R, et al. Deutsche Empfehlung zur gesundheitsökonomischen evaluation - dritte und aktualisierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens [German recommendations on health economic evaluation - third and updated version of the Hannover consensus]. Gesudh ökon Qual Manag. 2007;12(5):285–93. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-2007-963505.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a flexible and integrative psychiatric care model in a department of child and adolescent psychiatry in Tübingen, Germany: study protocol (EVA_TIBAS)
Authors
Anne Neumann
Helene Hense
Fabian Baum
Roman Kliemt
Martin Seifert
Lorenz Harst
Denise Kubat
Birgit Maicher
Christopher Schrey
Jochen Schmitt
Andrea Pfennig
Ines Weinhold
Enno Swart
Bettina Soltmann
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07226-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue