Published in:
01-04-2014 | Original Article
Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection
Authors:
Caecilia S. Reiner, Paul Stolzmann, Lars Husmann, Irene A. Burger, Martin W. Hüllner, Niklaus G. Schaefer, Paul M. Schneider, Gustav K. von Schulthess, Patrick Veit-Haibach
Published in:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
|
Issue 4/2014
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
To compare the accuracy of PET/MR imaging with that of FDG PET/CT and to determine the MR sequences necessary for the detection of liver metastasis using a trimodality PET/CT/MR set-up.
Methods
Included in this single-centre IRB-approved study were 55 patients (22 women, age 61 ± 11 years) with suspected liver metastases from gastrointestinal cancer. Imaging using a trimodality PET/CT/MR set-up (time-of-flight PET/CT and 3-T whole-body MR imager) comprised PET, low-dose CT, contrast-enhanced (CE) CT of the abdomen, and MR with T1-W/T2-W, diffusion-weighted (DWI), and dynamic CE imaging. Two readers evaluated the following image sets for liver metastasis: PET/CT (set A), PET/CECT (B), PET/MR including T1-W/T2-W (C), T1-W/T2-W with either DWI (D) or CE imaging (E), and a combination (F). The accuracy of each image set was determined by receiver-operating characteristic analysis using image set B as the standard of reference.
Results
Of 120 liver lesions in 21/55 patients (38 %), 79 (66 %) were considered malignant, and 63/79 (80 %) showed abnormal FDG uptake. Accuracies were 0.937 (95 % CI 89.5 – 97.9 %) for image set A, 1.00 (95 % CI 99.9 – 100.0 %) for set C, 0.998 (95 % CI 99.4 – 100.0 %) for set D, 0.997 (95 % CI 99.3 – 100.0 %) for set E, and 0.995 (95 % CI 99.0 – 100.0 %) for set F. Differences were significant for image sets D – F (P < 0.05) when including lesions without abnormal FDG uptake. As shown by follow-up imaging after 50 – 177 days, the use of image sets D and both sets E and F led to the detection of metastases in one and three patients, respectively, and further metastases in the contralateral lobe in two patients negative on PET/CECT (P = 0.06).
Conclusion
PET/MR imaging with T1-W/T2-W sequences results in similar diagnostic accuracy for the detection of liver metastases to PET/CECT. To significantly improve the characterization of liver lesions, we recommend the use of dynamic CE imaging sequences. PET/MR imaging has a diagnostic impact on clinical decision making.