Top

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Prosthodontics | Research

Bone turnover markers to assess jawbone quality prior to dental implant treatment: a case-control study

Authors: Keisuke Yasuda, Shinsuke Okada, Yohei Okazaki, Kyou Hiasa, Kazuhiro Tsuga, Yasuhiko Abe

Published in: International Journal of Implant Dentistry | Issue 1/2020

Abstract

Background

Bone quality is as important as bone mineral density in terms of bone strength. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are clinical indicators of bone quality. In implant dentistry, bone quality is considered equivalent to bone density on radiographic assessments. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the BTM values are reflected in jawbone condition by evaluating the relationship at baseline and during follow-up in patients with prosthodontic implants.

Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained and BTM (osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, pyridinoline cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen, and crosslinked N-telopeptide of type I collagen) levels in blood samples were measured in partially edentulous eighteen patients before implant surgery. During the follow-up observation after implant surgery, marginal bone loss (MBL) was measured on dental radiography. We investigated the relationship between the presence of BTM abnormalities and radiographic bone density.

Results

More women than men had abnormal BTM values. Bone turnover was accelerated in the group of women with abnormal BTM values. The density of cancellous bone at the implant placement site was significantly lower in the patients with abnormally high BTM values than in their counterparts with BTM values in the normal range.

Conclusions

Female patients who undergo implant treatments may have reduced bone quality; evaluations of bone strength will require assessments of both BTMs and the density of cancellous bone.

Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;84:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.008.CrossRefPubMed

Mozzati M, Gallesio G, Del Fabbro M. Long-term (9-12 years) outcomes of titanium implants with an oxidized surface: A retrospective investigation on 209 implants. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41:437–43. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00211.CrossRefPubMed

Lekholm U, Zarb G. Patient selection and preparation. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration. In: Proceedings of Clinical Dentistry. New Malden: Quintessence; 1985. p. 199–209.

de Medeiros FCFL, Kudo GAH, Leme BG, Saraiva PP, Verri FR, Honório HM, et al. Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:480–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.021.CrossRefPubMed

Tsolaki IN, Madianos PN, Vrotsos JA. Outcomes of dental implants in osteoporotic patients. A literature review. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:309–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00433.x.CrossRefPubMed

Merheb J, Temmerman A, Coucke W, Rasmusson L, Kübler A, Thor A, et al. Relation between spongy bone density in the maxilla and skeletal bone density. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:1180–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12228.CrossRefPubMed

National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention, and therapy, osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 2001;285:785–95.CrossRef

Fyhrie DP. Summary-measuring “bone quality”. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005;5:318–20 PMID:16340121.PubMed

Weinstein RS. True strength. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:621–5. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.621.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Chesnut CH III, Rosen CJ for the Bone Quality Discussion Group. Reconsidering the effects of antiresorptive therapies in reducing osteoporotic fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:2163–72. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2163.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140238. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140238.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Eastell R, Bauman M, Hoyle NR, Wieczorek L, editors. Bone markers: biochemical and clinical perspectives. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2001.

13.

Nickolas TL, Stein EM, Dworakowski E, Nishiyama KK, Komandah-Kosseh M, Zhang CA, et al. Rapid cortical bone loss in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:1811–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Jørgensen HS, Winther S, Bøttcher M, Hauge EM, Rejnmark L, Svensson M, et al. Bone turnover markers are associated with bone density, but not with fracture in end stage kidney disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0692-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Misch CE. Bone density: A key determinant for clinical success. In: Misch CE, editor. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St Louis: CV Mosby Company; 1999. p. 109–18.

16.

Lombardi G, Lanteri P, Colombini A, Banfi G. Blood biochemical markers of bone turnover: pre-analytical and technical aspects of sample collection and handling. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50:771–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2011-0614.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Committee of use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis, Japan Osteoporosis Society. Japanese guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis (in Japanese). Osteoporosis Jpn. 2012;20:33–5.

18.

World Health Organization. WHO scientific group on the assessment of osteoporosis at primary health care level. Summ Meeting Rep. 2004;5:5–7.

19.

Japanese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (in Japanese). Life Science Publishing Co. Ltd, Tokyo; 2006.

20.

Venken K, Callewaert F, Boonen S, Vanderschueren D. Sex hormones, their receptors and bone health. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:1517–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0609-z.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Lin MI, Shen YW, Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ. A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level. J Dent Res. 2013;92:202S–7S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513510322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Almasoud NN, Tanneru N, Marei HF. Alveolar bone density and its clinical implication in the placement of dental implants and orthodontic mini-implants. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:684–9. https://doi.org/10.15537/Smj.2016.6.14274.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Dresner-Pollak R, Parker RA, Poku M, Thompson J, Seibel MJ, Greenspan SL. Biochemical markers of bone turnover reflect femoral bone loss in elderly women. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59:328–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900135.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Garnero P, Hausherr E, Chapuy MC, Marcelli C, Grandjean H, Muller C, et al. Markers of bone resorption predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:1531–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650111021.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Nishizawa Y, Nakamura T, Ohta H, Kushida K, Gorai I, Shiraki M, et al. Guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis (2004). J Bone Miner Metab. 2005;23:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-004-0547-6.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:290–8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Asvanund P, Morgano SM. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:266–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Liu S, Tang C, Yu J, Dai W, Bao Y, Hu D. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1111–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.017.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ivasaka KK, Gerdhem P, Vaananen HK, Akesson K, Obrant KJ. Bone turnover markers and prediction of fracture: A prospective follow-up study of 1040 elderly women for a mean of 9 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.091006.CrossRef

30.

Gerdhem P, Ivasaka KK, Alatalo SL, Halleen JM, Hellman J, Isaksson A, et al. Biochemical markers of metabolism and prediction of fracture in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:386–93. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.0301244.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Miller PD, Hochberg MC, Wehren LE, Ross PD, Wasnich RD. How useful are measures of BMD and turnover? Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:545–53. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079905X41390.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Takaishi Y, Okamoto Y, Ikeo T, Morii H, Takeda M, Hide K, et al. Correlations between periodontitis and loss of mandibular bone in relation to systemic bone changes in postmenopausal Japanese women. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1875–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1955-8.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Yoshihara A, Deguchi T, Hanada N, Miyazaki H. Relation of bone turnover markers to periodontal disease and jaw bone morphology in elderly Japanese subjects. Oral Dis. 2009;15:176–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2008.01511.x.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Bone turnover markers to assess jawbone quality prior to dental implant treatment: a case-control study
Authors: Keisuke Yasuda
Shinsuke Okada
Yohei Okazaki
Kyou Hiasa
Kazuhiro Tsuga
Yasuhiko Abe
Publication date: 01-12-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword: Prosthodontics
Published in: International Journal of Implant Dentistry / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2198-4034
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00264-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Bone turnover markers to assess jawbone quality prior to dental implant treatment: a case-control study

Abstract

Background

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement

Influence of antihypertensive medications on the clinical parameters of anodized dental implants: a retrospective cohort study

Residual decontamination chemical agents negatively affect adhesion and proliferation of osteoblast-like cells on implant surface

Effects of implant thread design on primary stability—a comparison between single- and double-threaded implants in an artificial bone model

Influence of occlusal loading on peri-implant inflammatory cytokines in crevicular fluid: a prospective longitudinal study

Antibiotic prescribing habits of the clinicians dealing with dental implant surgery in Turkey: a questionnaire study