Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 8/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Paper

Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography versus 3D-transesophageal echocardiography

Authors: Cristina da Silva, Anders Sahlen, Reidar Winter, Magnus Bäck, Andreas Rück, Magnus Settergren, Aristomenis Manouras, Kambiz Shahgaldi

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

To investigate the role of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) and 3D-transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) in the determination of aortic annulus size prior transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and its’ impact on the prevalence of patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM). Echocardiography plays an important role in measuring aortic annulus dimension in patients undergoing TAVI. This has great importance since it determines both eligibility for TAVI and selection of prosthesis type and size, and can be potentially important in preventing an inadequate ratio between the prosthetic valvular orifice and the patient’s body surface area, concept known as prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). A total of 45 patients were studied pre-TAVI: 20 underwent 3D-TEE (men/women 12/8, age 84.8 ± 5.6) and 25 2D-TTE (men/women 9/16, age 84.4 ± 5.4) in order to measure aortic annulus diameter. The presence of PPM was assessed before hospital discharge and after a mean period of 3 months. Moderate PPM was defined as indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) ≤ 0.85 cm2/m2 and severe PPM as AVAi < 0.65 cm2/m2. Immediately post-TAVI, moderate PPM was present in 25 and 28 % of patients worked up using 3D-TEE and 2D-TTE respectively p value = n.s) and severe PPM occurred in 10 % of the patients who underwent 3D-TEE and in 20 % in those with 2D-TTE (p value = n.s). The echocardiographic evaluation 3 months post-TAVI showed 25 % moderate PPM in the 3D-TEE group compared with 24 % in the 2D-TTE group (p value = n.s) and no cases of severe PPM in the 3DTEE group comparing to 20 % in the 2D-TTE group (p = 0.032). Our results indicate a higher incidence of severe PPM in patients who performed 2DTTE compared to those performing 3DTEE prior TAVI. This suggests that the 3D technique should replace the 2DTTE analysis when investigating the aortic annulus diameter in patients undergoing TAVI.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Kukucka M, Pasic M, Dreysse S, et al. (2012) Patient-prosthesis mismatch after transapical aortic valve implantation: incidence and impact on survival. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1(2):172–175 Kukucka M, Pasic M, Dreysse S, et al. (2012) Patient-prosthesis mismatch after transapical aortic valve implantation: incidence and impact on survival. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1(2):172–175
3.
go back to reference Ewe SH, Muratori M, Delgado V et al (2011) Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1910–1918PubMedCrossRef Ewe SH, Muratori M, Delgado V et al (2011) Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1910–1918PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2012) Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic valve function. Heart 98:69–78PubMedCrossRef Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2012) Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic valve function. Heart 98:69–78PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2000) Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1131–1141PubMedCrossRef Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2000) Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1131–1141PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Walther T, Rastan A, Falk V et al (2006) Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30:15–19PubMedCrossRef Walther T, Rastan A, Falk V et al (2006) Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30:15–19PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P (2003) Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108:983–988PubMedCrossRef Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P (2003) Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108:983–988PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Moss RR, Ivens E, Pasupati S et al (2008) Role of echocardiography in percutaneous aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:15–24PubMedCrossRef Moss RR, Ivens E, Pasupati S et al (2008) Role of echocardiography in percutaneous aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:15–24PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kalavrouziotis D, Rodes-Cabau J, Bagur R et al (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1016–1024PubMedCrossRef Kalavrouziotis D, Rodes-Cabau J, Bagur R et al (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1016–1024PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jayasuriya C, Moss RR, Munt B (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in aortic stenosis: the role of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:15–27PubMedCrossRef Jayasuriya C, Moss RR, Munt B (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in aortic stenosis: the role of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:15–27PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the joint task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 33:2451–2496PubMedCrossRef Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the joint task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 33:2451–2496PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zamorano JL, Badano LP, Bruce C et al (2011) EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 32:2189–2214PubMedCrossRef Zamorano JL, Badano LP, Bruce C et al (2011) EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 32:2189–2214PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease): developed in collaboration with the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists: endorsed by the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions and the society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation 114:e84–e231PubMedCrossRef Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease): developed in collaboration with the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists: endorsed by the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions and the society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation 114:e84–e231PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2006) Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 7:79–108PubMedCrossRef Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2006) Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 7:79–108PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al. (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr22:1–23; quiz 101–2 Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al. (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr22:1–23; quiz 101–2
16.
go back to reference Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. (2009) Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:975–1014; quiz 82–4 Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. (2009) Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:975–1014; quiz 82–4
17.
go back to reference Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2009) Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation 119:1034–1048PubMedCrossRef Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2009) Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation 119:1034–1048PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Huffmyer J, Tashjian J, Raphael J, Jaeger JM (2012) Management of the patient for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the perioperative period. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16:25–40PubMedCrossRef Huffmyer J, Tashjian J, Raphael J, Jaeger JM (2012) Management of the patient for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the perioperative period. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16:25–40PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Webb JG, Pibarot P et al (2009) Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1883–1891PubMedCrossRef Clavel MA, Webb JG, Pibarot P et al (2009) Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1883–1891PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tzikas A, Piazza N, Geleijnse ML et al (2010) Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the medtronic CoreValve system in patients with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 106:255–260PubMedCrossRef Tzikas A, Piazza N, Geleijnse ML et al (2010) Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the medtronic CoreValve system in patients with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 106:255–260PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Jilaihawi H, Chin D, Spyt T et al (2010) Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis. Eur Heart J 31:857–864PubMedCrossRef Jilaihawi H, Chin D, Spyt T et al (2010) Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis. Eur Heart J 31:857–864PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Rodes-Cabau J, Dumont E et al (2011) Validation and characterization of transcatheter aortic valve effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:1053–1062PubMedCrossRef Clavel MA, Rodes-Cabau J, Dumont E et al (2011) Validation and characterization of transcatheter aortic valve effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:1053–1062PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, Becker AE, Serruys PW, Anderson RH (2008) Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1:74–81PubMedCrossRef Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, Becker AE, Serruys PW, Anderson RH (2008) Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1:74–81PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR, Calhoon JH, Carabello BA, Desai MY, Edwards FH, Francis GS, Gardner TJ, Kappetein AP, Linderbaum JA, Mukherjee C, Mukherjee D, Otto CM, Ruiz CE, Sacco RL, Smith D, Thomas JD (2012) ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1200–1254 Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR, Calhoon JH, Carabello BA, Desai MY, Edwards FH, Francis GS, Gardner TJ, Kappetein AP, Linderbaum JA, Mukherjee C, Mukherjee D, Otto CM, Ruiz CE, Sacco RL, Smith D, Thomas JD (2012) ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1200–1254
25.
go back to reference Grube E, Laborde JC, Gerckens U et al (2006) Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study. Circulation 114:1616–1624PubMedCrossRef Grube E, Laborde JC, Gerckens U et al (2006) Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study. Circulation 114:1616–1624PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Altiok E, Koos R, Schroder J et al (2011) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart 97:1578–1584PubMedCrossRef Altiok E, Koos R, Schroder J et al (2011) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart 97:1578–1584PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Husser O, Rauch S, Endemann DH et al (2012) Impact of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography on prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:956PubMedCrossRef Husser O, Rauch S, Endemann DH et al (2012) Impact of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography on prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:956PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Apostolakis E, Baikoussis NG, Papakonstantinou NA, Goudevenos J (2011) Patient-prosthesis mismatch and strategies to prevent it during aortic valve replacement. Hell J Cardiol 52:41–51 Apostolakis E, Baikoussis NG, Papakonstantinou NA, Goudevenos J (2011) Patient-prosthesis mismatch and strategies to prevent it during aortic valve replacement. Hell J Cardiol 52:41–51
29.
go back to reference Rabus MB, Kirali K, Kayalar N et al (2009) Effects of patient-prosthesis mismatch on postoperative early mortality in isolated aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 18:18–27PubMed Rabus MB, Kirali K, Kayalar N et al (2009) Effects of patient-prosthesis mismatch on postoperative early mortality in isolated aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 18:18–27PubMed
30.
go back to reference Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, et al. (2005) Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 79:1291–1296; discussion 6 Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, et al. (2005) Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 79:1291–1296; discussion 6
31.
go back to reference Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M et al (2005) Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 79:505–510PubMedCrossRef Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M et al (2005) Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 79:505–510PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kandler K, Møller CH, Hassager C et al (2013) Patient-prosthesis mismatch and reduction in left ventricular mass after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 96(1):66–71 Kandler K, Møller CH, Hassager C et al (2013) Patient-prosthesis mismatch and reduction in left ventricular mass after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 96(1):66–71
33.
go back to reference Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M et al (2003) Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1107–1113PubMedCrossRef Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M et al (2003) Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1107–1113PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Patsalis PC, Konorza TF, Al-Rashid F et al (2013) Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 304(7):H1023–H1028 Patsalis PC, Konorza TF, Al-Rashid F et al (2013) Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 304(7):H1023–H1028
35.
go back to reference Ionescu A, Fraser AG, Butchart EG (2003) Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart 89:1316–1321PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ionescu A, Fraser AG, Butchart EG (2003) Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart 89:1316–1321PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference O’Rourke DJ, Palac RT, Malenka DJ, Marrin CA, Arbuckle BE, Plehn JF (2001) Outcome of mild periprosthetic regurgitation detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:163–166PubMedCrossRef O’Rourke DJ, Palac RT, Malenka DJ, Marrin CA, Arbuckle BE, Plehn JF (2001) Outcome of mild periprosthetic regurgitation detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:163–166PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography versus 3D-transesophageal echocardiography
Authors
Cristina da Silva
Anders Sahlen
Reidar Winter
Magnus Bäck
Andreas Rück
Magnus Settergren
Aristomenis Manouras
Kambiz Shahgaldi
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0510-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 8/2014 Go to the issue