Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer

Long-term results and factors predictive for outcome and toxicity

Authors: Assistant Professor Ciro Franzese, MD, Marco Badalamenti, Lucia Di Brina, Giuseppe D’Agostino, Davide Franceschini, Tiziana Comito, Elena Clerici, Pierina Navarria, Giacomo Reggiori, Pietro Mancosu, Stefano Tomatis, Full Professor Marta Scorsetti

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is considered an effective and safe treatment in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC). However, due to a lack of long-term follow-up and late toxicity data, this treatment is not universally accepted. The present study aimed to evaluate outcome and early and late toxicity in a cohort of patients with low- and intermediate-risk PC treated prospectively with linear accelerator (linac)-based SBRT.

Patients and methods

Patients with low- or intermediate-risk (NCCN criteria) PC were included. All patients received linac-based SBRT to 35 Gy in 5 fractions delivered on alternate days. Endpoints were toxicity, biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), metastatic progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

From 2012 to 2018, 178 patients were treated. Median baseline prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) was 6.37 ng/ml (range 1.78–20). Previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was present in 23 (12.9%) patients. Median follow-up was 58.9 months (range 9.7–89.9). BRFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 98.3 (95% confidence interval, CI, 94.7–99.4%), 94.4 (95%CI 89.4–97), and 91.6% (95%CI 85.4–95.2), respectively. In univariate analysis, performance status (PS), iPSA, and nadir PSA (nPSA) were correlated with BRFS. In multivariable analysis iPSA and nPSA remained significant. BRFS rates at 5 years were 94.9% (95%CI 86.8–98) for International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 1, 93.2% (95%CI 80.5–97.7) for ISUP group 2, and 74.8% (95%CI 47.1–89.5) for ISUP group 3. At 1, 3, and 5 years, mPFS rates were 98.8 (95%CI 95.5–99.7), 96.2 (95%CI 91.9–98.3), and 92.9% (95%CI 87.2–96.2), respectively; OS rates were 100, 97.2 (95%CI 92.9–98.9), and 95.1% (95%CI 90–97.6), respectively. One (0.56%) case of grade 3 acute genitourinary (GU), one case of acute gastrointestinal (GI), and one case of grade 3 late GU toxicity were observed. GI toxicity positively correlated with prostate volume.

Conclusion

At long-term follow-up, linac-based SBRT continues to be a valid option for the management localized PC. Biochemical control remains high at 5 years, albeit with some concerns regarding the optimal schedule for unfavorable intermediate-risk PC. Considering the excellent prognosis, patient selection is crucial for prevention of severe late toxicity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KDJA (2018) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2017(67):7–30CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KDJA (2018) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2017(67):7–30CrossRef
2.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer 2019. Version4.2019. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 02/01/2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer 2019. Version4.2019. http://​www.​nccn.​org. Accessed 02/01/2020
10.
go back to reference D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz BS, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Am Med Assoc 280:969–974. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.11.969 CrossRef D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz BS, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Am Med Assoc 280:969–974. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​280.​11.​969 CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L et al (2019) Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5‑year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet 3;394(10196):385–395 (Aug)CrossRef Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L et al (2019) Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5‑year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet 3;394(10196):385–395 (Aug)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer
Long-term results and factors predictive for outcome and toxicity
Authors
Assistant Professor Ciro Franzese, MD
Marco Badalamenti
Lucia Di Brina
Giuseppe D’Agostino
Davide Franceschini
Tiziana Comito
Elena Clerici
Pierina Navarria
Giacomo Reggiori
Pietro Mancosu
Stefano Tomatis
Full Professor Marta Scorsetti
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01619-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2020 Go to the issue