Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 10/2023

26-06-2023 | Prostate Cancer | Pelvis

Improving reader accuracy and specificity with the addition of hybrid multidimensional-MRI to multiparametric-MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancers

Authors: Grace Lee, Aritrick Chatterjee, Carla Harmath, Ibrahim Karademir, Roger Engelmann, Ambereen Yousuf, Salman Islam, Gregory Karczmar, Aytekin Oto, Mihai Giurcanu, Tatjana Antic, Scott Eggener

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 10/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Compare reader performance when adding the Hybrid Multidimensional-MRI (HM-MRI) map to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI+HM-MRI) versus mpMRI alone and inter-reader agreement in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancers (CSPCa).

Methods

All 61 patients who underwent mpMRI (T2-, diffusion-weighted (DWI), and contrast-enhanced scans) and HM-MRI (with multiple TE/b-value combinations) before prostatectomy or MRI-fused-transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy between August, 2012 and February, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Two experienced readers (R1, R2) and two less-experienced readers (less than 6-year MRI prostate experience) (R3, R4) interpreted mpMRI without/with HM-MRI in the same sitting. Readers recorded the PI-RADS 3-5 score, lesion location, and change in score after adding HM-MRI. Each radiologist’s mpMRI+HM-MRI and mpMRI performance measures (AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy) based on pathology, and Fleiss’ kappa inter-reader agreement was calculated and compared.

Results

Per-sextant R3 and R4 mpMRI+HM-MRI accuracy (82% 81% vs. 77%, 71%; p=.006, <.001) and specificity (89%, 88% vs. 84%, 75%; p=.009, <.001) were higher than with mpMRI. Per-patient R4 mpMRI+HM-MRI specificity improved (48% from 7%; p<.001). R1 and R2 mpMRI+HM-MRI specificity per-sextant (80%, 93% vs. 81%, 93%; p=.51,>.99) and per-patient (37%, 41% vs. 48%, 37%; p=.16, .57) remained similar to mpMRI. R1 and R2 per-patient AUC with mpMRI+HM-MRI (0.63, 0.64 vs. 0.67, 0.61; p=.33, .36) remained similar to mpMRI, but R3 and R4 mpMRI+HM-MRI AUC (0.73, 0.62) approached R1 and R2 AUC. Per-patient inter-reader agreement, mpMRI+HM-MRI Fleiss Kappa, was higher than mpMRI (0.36 [95% CI 0.26, 0.46] vs. 0.17 [95% CI 0.07, 0.27]); p=.009).

Conclusion

Adding HM-MRI to mpMRI (mpMRI+HM-MRI) improved specificity and accuracy for less-experienced readers, improving overall inter-reader agreement.

Graphical Abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
6.
go back to reference Youn SY, Choi MH, Kim DH, Lee YJ, Huisman H, Johnson E, ... & Kamen A. Detection and PI-RADS classification of focal lesions in prostate MRI: performance comparison between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) and radiologists with various levels of experience. European Journal of Radiology 2021; 142: 109894 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109894 Youn SY, Choi MH, Kim DH, Lee YJ, Huisman H, Johnson E, ... & Kamen A. Detection and PI-RADS classification of focal lesions in prostate MRI: performance comparison between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) and radiologists with various levels of experience. European Journal of Radiology 2021; 142: 109894 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2021.​109894
10.
go back to reference Gaur S, Lay N, Harmon SA, Doddakashi S, Mehralivand S, Argun B, Barrett T, Bednarova S, Girometti R, Karaarslan E, Kural AR, Oto A, Purysko AS, Antic T, Magi-Galluzzi C, Saglican Y, Sioletic S, Warren AY, Bittencourt L, Fütterer JJ, Gupta RT, Kabakus I, Law YM, Margolis DJ, Shebel H, Westphalen AC, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Shih JH, Choyke PL, Summers RM, Turkbey B. Can computer-aided diagnosis assist in the identification of prostate cancer on prostate MRI? a multi-center, multi-reader investigation. Oncotarget 2018; 9(73):33804-33817 https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26100 Gaur S, Lay N, Harmon SA, Doddakashi S, Mehralivand S, Argun B, Barrett T, Bednarova S, Girometti R, Karaarslan E, Kural AR, Oto A, Purysko AS, Antic T, Magi-Galluzzi C, Saglican Y, Sioletic S, Warren AY, Bittencourt L, Fütterer JJ, Gupta RT, Kabakus I, Law YM, Margolis DJ, Shebel H, Westphalen AC, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Shih JH, Choyke PL, Summers RM, Turkbey B. Can computer-aided diagnosis assist in the identification of prostate cancer on prostate MRI? a multi-center, multi-reader investigation. Oncotarget 2018; 9(73):33804-33817 https://​doi.​org/​10.​18632/​oncotarget.​26100
12.
go back to reference Chatterjee A, Bourne R, Wang S, Devaraj A, Gallan A, Antic T, Karczmar G, Oto A. Diagnosis of prostate cancer with noninvasive estimation of prostate tissue composition by using hybrid multidimensional MR imaging: a feasibility study. Radiology 2018; 287:864–873 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171130 Chatterjee A, Bourne R, Wang S, Devaraj A, Gallan A, Antic T, Karczmar G, Oto A. Diagnosis of prostate cancer with noninvasive estimation of prostate tissue composition by using hybrid multidimensional MR imaging: a feasibility study. Radiology 2018; 287:864–873 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​2018171130
13.
go back to reference Wang S, Peng Y, Medved M, Yousuf A, Ivancevic M, Karademir I, Jiang Y, Antic T, Sammet S, Oto A, Karczmar G. Hybrid multidimensional T2 and diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014; 39:781-788 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24212 Wang S, Peng Y, Medved M, Yousuf A, Ivancevic M, Karademir I, Jiang Y, Antic T, Sammet S, Oto A, Karczmar G. Hybrid multidimensional T2 and diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014; 39:781-788 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​24212
14.
go back to reference Chatterjee A, Watson G, Myint E, Sved P, McEntee M, Bourne R. Changes in epithelium, stroma, and lumen space correlate more strongly with Gleason pattern and are stronger predictors of prostate ADC changes than cellularity metrics. Radiology 2015; 277: 751-762 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142414 Chatterjee A, Watson G, Myint E, Sved P, McEntee M, Bourne R. Changes in epithelium, stroma, and lumen space correlate more strongly with Gleason pattern and are stronger predictors of prostate ADC changes than cellularity metrics. Radiology 2015; 277: 751-762 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​2015142414
16.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Wu H, Priester A, Magyar C, Mirak SA, Shakeri S, Bajgiran AM, Hosseiny M, Azadikhah A, Sung K, Reiter R, Sisk A, Raman S, Enzmann D. Prostate microstructure in prostate cancer using 3-T MRI with diffusionrelaxation correlation spectrum imaging: validation with whole-mount digital histopathology. Radiology 2020; 296:348–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020192330CrossRefPubMed Zhang Z, Wu H, Priester A, Magyar C, Mirak SA, Shakeri S, Bajgiran AM, Hosseiny M, Azadikhah A, Sung K, Reiter R, Sisk A, Raman S, Enzmann D. Prostate microstructure in prostate cancer using 3-T MRI with diffusionrelaxation correlation spectrum imaging: validation with whole-mount digital histopathology. Radiology 2020; 296:348–355. https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​2020192330CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Johnston E, Bonet-Carne E, Ferizi U, Yvernault B, Pye H, Patel D, Clemente J, Piga W, Heavey S, Sidhu H, Giganti F, O’Callaghan J, ……. Punwani S. VERDICT MRI for prostate cancer: intracellular volume fraction versus apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 2019; 291:391–397. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019181749 Johnston E, Bonet-Carne E, Ferizi U, Yvernault B, Pye H, Patel D, Clemente J, Piga W, Heavey S, Sidhu H, Giganti F, O’Callaghan J, ……. Punwani S. VERDICT MRI for prostate cancer: intracellular volume fraction versus apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 2019; 291:391–397. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​2019181749
18.
go back to reference Panagiotaki E,Chan R,Dikaios N, Ahmed H, O’Callaghan J, Freeman A, Atkinson D, Punwani S, Hawkes D, Alexander D. Microstructural characterization of normal and malignant human prostate tissue with vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumors magnetic resonance imaging. Investigative Radiology 2015; 50(4):218-227. https://doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000115CrossRefPubMed Panagiotaki E,Chan R,Dikaios N, Ahmed H, O’Callaghan J, Freeman A, Atkinson D, Punwani S, Hawkes D, Alexander D. Microstructural characterization of normal and malignant human prostate tissue with vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumors magnetic resonance imaging. Investigative Radiology 2015; 50(4):218-227. https://​doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​RLI.​0000000000000115​CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference McCammack KC, Kane CJ, Parsons JK, White NS, Schenker-Ahmed NM, Kuperman JM, Bartsch H, Desikan RS, Rakow-Penner RA, Adams D, Liss MA, Mattrey RF, Bradley WG, Margolis DJA, Raman SS, Shabaik A, Dale AM, and Karow DS. In vivo prostate cancer detection and grading using restriction spectrum imaging-MRI. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 2016; 19(2):168 – 173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2015.61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCammack KC, Kane CJ, Parsons JK, White NS, Schenker-Ahmed NM, Kuperman JM, Bartsch H, Desikan RS, Rakow-Penner RA, Adams D, Liss MA, Mattrey RF, Bradley WG, Margolis DJA, Raman SS, Shabaik A, Dale AM, and Karow DS. In vivo prostate cancer detection and grading using restriction spectrum imaging-MRI. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 2016; 19(2):168 – 173. https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​pcan.​2015.​61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Lee GH, Chatterjee A, Karademir I, Engelmann R, Yousuf A, Giurcanu M, ... & Oto A. Comparing radiologist performance in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer with multiparametric versus hybrid multidimensional MRI. Radiology 2022; 305(2):399-407 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.211895 Lee GH, Chatterjee A, Karademir I, Engelmann R, Yousuf A, Giurcanu M, ... & Oto A. Comparing radiologist performance in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer with multiparametric versus hybrid multidimensional MRI. Radiology 2022; 305(2):399-407 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​211895
25.
go back to reference Efron B (1992) Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Breakthroughs in statistics. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, pp 1-26. Efron B (1992) Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Breakthroughs in statistics. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, pp 1-26.
27.
go back to reference Sun C, Chatterjee A, Yousuf A, Antic T, Eggener S, Karczmar GS, Oto A. Comparison of T2-weighted imaging, DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for calculation of prostate cancer index lesion volume; correlation with whole-mount pathology, American Journal of Roentgenology 2019; 212(2): 351-356. https://doi.https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20147CrossRefPubMed Sun C, Chatterjee A, Yousuf A, Antic T, Eggener S, Karczmar GS, Oto A. Comparison of T2-weighted imaging, DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for calculation of prostate cancer index lesion volume; correlation with whole-mount pathology, American Journal of Roentgenology 2019; 212(2): 351-356. https://​doi.​https://​doi.​org/​10.​2214/​AJR.​18.​20147CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gundogdu B, Pittman J, Chatterjee A, Szasz T, Lee G, Giurcanu M, Medved M, Engelmann R, Guo Xiaodong, Yousuf A, Antic T, Devarag A, Fan X, Oto A, Karczmar G. Directional and inter-acquisition variability in diffusionweighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2022, 88: 2298-2310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gundogdu B, Pittman J, Chatterjee A, Szasz T, Lee G, Giurcanu M, Medved M, Engelmann R, Guo Xiaodong, Yousuf A, Antic T, Devarag A, Fan X, Oto A, Karczmar G. Directional and inter-acquisition variability in diffusionweighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2022, 88: 2298-2310. https://​doi.​org/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​mrm.​29385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Becerra MF, Alameddine M, Zucker I, Tamariz L, Palacio A, Nemeth Z, Velasquez MC, Savio LF, Panizzutti M, Jue JS, Soodana-Prakash N, Ritch CR, Gonzalgo ML, Parekh DJ, Punnen S. Performance of multiparametric MRI of the prostate in biopsy naïve men: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Urology 2020; 146:189-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.102 Becerra MF, Alameddine M, Zucker I, Tamariz L, Palacio A, Nemeth Z, Velasquez MC, Savio LF, Panizzutti M, Jue JS, Soodana-Prakash N, Ritch CR, Gonzalgo ML, Parekh DJ, Punnen S. Performance of multiparametric MRI of the prostate in biopsy naïve men: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Urology 2020; 146:189-195 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2020.​06.​102
32.
go back to reference Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, ... & Briganti A. Positive predictive value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European urology oncology 2021; 4(5): 697-713. https://doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euro.2020.12.004 Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, ... & Briganti A. Positive predictive value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European urology oncology 2021; 4(5): 697-713. https://​doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​euro.​2020.​12.​004
33.
go back to reference Hietikko R, Kilpeläinen TP, Kenttämies A, Ronkainen J, Ijäs K, Lind K, Marjasuo S, Oksala J, Oksanen O, Saarinen T, et al. Expected impact of MRI-related interreader variability on ProScreen prostate cancer screening trial: a pre-trial validation study. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20(1): 1-8, 72 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00351-w Hietikko R, Kilpeläinen TP, Kenttämies A, Ronkainen J, Ijäs K, Lind K, Marjasuo S, Oksala J, Oksanen O, Saarinen T, et al. Expected impact of MRI-related interreader variability on ProScreen prostate cancer screening trial: a pre-trial validation study. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20(1): 1-8, 72 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s40644-020-00351-w
Metadata
Title
Improving reader accuracy and specificity with the addition of hybrid multidimensional-MRI to multiparametric-MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancers
Authors
Grace Lee
Aritrick Chatterjee
Carla Harmath
Ibrahim Karademir
Roger Engelmann
Ambereen Yousuf
Salman Islam
Gregory Karczmar
Aytekin Oto
Mihai Giurcanu
Tatjana Antic
Scott Eggener
Publication date
26-06-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 10/2023
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03969-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2023

Abdominal Radiology 10/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.