Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2023

11-09-2023 | Prostate Cancer | Urologic Oncology

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (Sonablate®) for Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Outcomes in Taiwan

Authors: Mu Yao Tsai, MD, Chih Tai Lin, MD, Ping Hsuan Chiang, MD, Po Hui Chiang, MD, PhD, EMS, Ping Chia Chiang, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We reported preliminary outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) [Sonablate®] in the combination of transurethral resection of the prostate for localized prostate cancer in Taiwan.

Methods

Seventy-seven patients using Sonablate® HIFU for localized prostate cancer were enrolled in this study from April 2021 to December 2022. Prostate-specific antigen biochemical recurrence, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 scores, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) scores, and postoperative complications were recorded during follow-up.

Results

Overall, 19.5% of patients were low-risk, 36.4% were intermediate-risk, and 44.1% were high-risk according to the D’Amico risk classification. The median follow-up was 12.09 ± 5.85 months, and the biochemical-free survival rates for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 100% (15/15), 96.4% (27/28), and 79.4% (27/34), respectively. Four patients (5.2%) received salvage radiotherapy and all maintained biochemical-free survival. The mean IPSS and QoL scores before versus after HIFU were 10.4 versus 6.8 (p = 0.003) and 3.2 versus 3.0 (p = 0.096), respectively. There was no statistically significant change in preoperative and postoperative IIEF scores (20.6 vs. 19; p = 0.062) in patients who had an IIEF score of >15 at baseline and received nerve-sparing procedures (subtotal ablation).

Conclusions

The results of Sonablate® HIFU in Taiwan indicated adequate short-term cancer control, excellent potency, and continence preservation. HIFU can achieve improvement of IPSS with low complication rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, et al. Contemporary trends in low-risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol. 2007;178(3 Pt 2):S14–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Cooperberg MR, et al. Contemporary trends in low-risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol. 2007;178(3 Pt 2):S14–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Ziglioli F, et al. Oncologic outcome, side effects and comorbidity of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for localized prostate cancer: a review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;56:110–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ziglioli F, et al. Oncologic outcome, side effects and comorbidity of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for localized prostate cancer: a review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;56:110–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Kattan MW. Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram. J Urol. 2008;179(6):2207–10; discussion 2210-1. Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Kattan MW. Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram. J Urol. 2008;179(6):2207–10; discussion 2210-1.
5.
go back to reference Bakavicius A, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of focal therapy complications in prostate cancer: a standardized methodology. J Endourol. 2019;33(7):509–15.CrossRefPubMed Bakavicius A, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of focal therapy complications in prostate cancer: a standardized methodology. J Endourol. 2019;33(7):509–15.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Liu YY, Chiang PH. Comparisons of oncological and functional outcomes between primary whole-gland cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(1):328–34.CrossRefPubMed Liu YY, Chiang PH. Comparisons of oncological and functional outcomes between primary whole-gland cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(1):328–34.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chiang PH, Liu YY. Comparisons of oncological and functional outcomes among radical retropubic prostatectomy, high dose rate brachytherapy, cryoablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1905–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chiang PH, Liu YY. Comparisons of oncological and functional outcomes among radical retropubic prostatectomy, high dose rate brachytherapy, cryoablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1905–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Chen PY, Ching PH, Liu YY, et al. Primary whole-gland ablation for localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: the important predictors of biochemical recurrence. Int Urol. 2018;25(6):615–20.CrossRef Chen PY, Ching PH, Liu YY, et al. Primary whole-gland ablation for localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: the important predictors of biochemical recurrence. Int Urol. 2018;25(6):615–20.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wu YT, Chiang PH. Cohort study of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer treatment: medium-term results from a single center. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu YT, Chiang PH. Cohort study of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer treatment: medium-term results from a single center. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Kennedy JE, Ter Haar GR, Cranston D. High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? Br J Radiol. 2003;76(909):590–9. Kennedy JE, Ter Haar GR, Cranston D. High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? Br J Radiol. 2003;76(909):590–9.
12.
go back to reference Bozzini G, et al. Focal therapy of prostate cancer: energies and procedures. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(2):155–67.CrossRefPubMed Bozzini G, et al. Focal therapy of prostate cancer: energies and procedures. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(2):155–67.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Susani M, et al. Morphology of tissue destruction induced by focused ultrasound. Eur Urol. 1993;23(Suppl 1):34–8.CrossRefPubMed Susani M, et al. Morphology of tissue destruction induced by focused ultrasound. Eur Urol. 1993;23(Suppl 1):34–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Stride EP, Coussios CC. Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010;224(2):171–91. Stride EP, Coussios CC. Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010;224(2):171–91.
15.
go back to reference Tourinho-Barbosa RR, de la Rosette J, Sanchez-Salas R. Prostate cancer multifocality, the index lesion, and the microenvironment. Curr Opin Urol. 2018;28(6):499–505.CrossRefPubMed Tourinho-Barbosa RR, de la Rosette J, Sanchez-Salas R. Prostate cancer multifocality, the index lesion, and the microenvironment. Curr Opin Urol. 2018;28(6):499–505.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sogutdelen E, Haberal HB, Guliyev F, et al. Urethral stricture is an unpleasant complication after prostate surgery: a critical review of current literature. J Urol Surg. 2016;3(1):1–6.CrossRef Sogutdelen E, Haberal HB, Guliyev F, et al. Urethral stricture is an unpleasant complication after prostate surgery: a critical review of current literature. J Urol Surg. 2016;3(1):1–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Crouzet S, et al. Whole-gland ablation of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: oncologic outcomes and morbidity in 1002 patients. Eur Urol. 2014;65(5):907–14.CrossRefPubMed Crouzet S, et al. Whole-gland ablation of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: oncologic outcomes and morbidity in 1002 patients. Eur Urol. 2014;65(5):907–14.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Thüroff S, Chaussy C. Evolution and outcomes of 3 MHz high intensity focused ultrasound therapy for localized prostate cancer during 15 years. J Urol. 2013;190(2):702–10. Thüroff S, Chaussy C. Evolution and outcomes of 3 MHz high intensity focused ultrasound therapy for localized prostate cancer during 15 years. J Urol. 2013;190(2):702–10.
19.
go back to reference Pinthus JH, et al. Single-session primary high-intensity focused ultrasonography treatment for localized prostate cancer: biochemical outcomes using third generation-based technology. BJU Int. 2012;110(8):1142–8.CrossRefPubMed Pinthus JH, et al. Single-session primary high-intensity focused ultrasonography treatment for localized prostate cancer: biochemical outcomes using third generation-based technology. BJU Int. 2012;110(8):1142–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Misraï V, et al. Oncologic control provided by HIFU therapy as single treatment in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2008;26(5):481–5.CrossRefPubMed Misraï V, et al. Oncologic control provided by HIFU therapy as single treatment in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2008;26(5):481–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Blana A, et al. First analysis of the long-term results with transrectal HIFU in patients with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53(6):1194–201.CrossRefPubMed Blana A, et al. First analysis of the long-term results with transrectal HIFU in patients with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53(6):1194–201.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chaussy C, Thüroff S. The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection. Curr Urol Rep. 2003;4(3):248–52.CrossRefPubMed Chaussy C, Thüroff S. The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection. Curr Urol Rep. 2003;4(3):248–52.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Netsch C, Pfeiffer D, Gross AJ. Development of bladder outlet obstruction after a single treatment of prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: experience with 226 patients. J Endourol. 2010;24(9):1399–403.CrossRefPubMed Netsch C, Pfeiffer D, Gross AJ. Development of bladder outlet obstruction after a single treatment of prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: experience with 226 patients. J Endourol. 2010;24(9):1399–403.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Huang YC, Kan CH, Chiang PH, et al. Salvage radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer with biochemical failure after high-intensity focused ultrasound as primary treatment. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4450–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang YC, Kan CH, Chiang PH, et al. Salvage radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer with biochemical failure after high-intensity focused ultrasound as primary treatment. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4450–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Chaussy CG, Thüroff S. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer: a review. J Endourol. 2017;31(1):S30–7.CrossRefPubMed Chaussy CG, Thüroff S. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer: a review. J Endourol. 2017;31(1):S30–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (Sonablate®) for Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Outcomes in Taiwan
Authors
Mu Yao Tsai, MD
Chih Tai Lin, MD
Ping Hsuan Chiang, MD
Po Hui Chiang, MD, PhD, EMS
Ping Chia Chiang, MD
Publication date
11-09-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2023
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14250-4

Other articles of this Issue 13/2023

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2023 Go to the issue