Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 11/2021

01-11-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Prospective validation of stringent dose constraints for prostatic stereotactic radiation monotherapy: results of a single-arm phase II toxicity-oriented trial

Authors: Paul Nguyen, Ludovic Harzée, Paul Retif, Stéphane Joseph, Guillaume Vogin, Philippe Nickers

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 11/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There are no safety-focused trials on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. This prospective 3‑year phase II trial used binomial law to validate the safety and efficacy of SBRT with stringent organ at risk dose constraints that nevertheless permitted high planning target volume doses.

Methods

All consecutive ≥ 70-year-old patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent SBRT between 2014 and 2018 at the National Radiotherapy Center in Luxembourg were included. Patients with low Cancer of Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) scores (0–2) and intermediate scores (3–5) received 36.25 Gy. High-risk (6–10) patients received 37.5 Gy. Radiation was delivered in 5 fractions over 9 days with Cyberknife-M6™ (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Primary study outcome was Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAEv4) genitourinary and rectal toxicity scores at last follow-up. Based on binomial law, SRBT was considered safe in this cohort of 110 patients if there were ≤ 2 severe toxicity (CTCAEv4 grade ≥ 3) cases. Secondary outcomes were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and patient quality of life (QOL), as determined by the IPPS and the Urinary Incontinence QOL questionnaire.

Results

The first 110 patients who were accrued in a total cohort of 150 patients were included in this study and had a median follow-up of 36 months. Acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity never occurred. One transient late grade 3 case was observed. Thus, our SBRT program had an estimated severe toxicity rate of < 5% and was safe at the p < 0.05 level. Overall bPFS was 90%. QOL did not change relative to baseline.

Conclusion

The trial validated our SBRT regimen since it was both safe and effective.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG et al (2016) Hypofractionated versus conventionally frationated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer ( HYPRO ): final efficacy results from a randomised , multicentre , open-label , phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2045(16):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30070-5CrossRef Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG et al (2016) Hypofractionated versus conventionally frationated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer ( HYPRO ): final efficacy results from a randomised , multicentre , open-label , phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2045(16):1–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(16)30070-5CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Matzinger O, Duclos F, van den Bergh A et al (2009) Acute toxicity of curative radiotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk localised prostate cancer in the EORTC trial 22991. Eur J Cancer 45(16):2825–2834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca .2009.07.009CrossRef Matzinger O, Duclos F, van den Bergh A et al (2009) Acute toxicity of curative radiotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk localised prostate cancer in the EORTC trial 22991. Eur J Cancer 45(16):2825–2834. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejca .2009.07.009CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wilke L, Andratschke N, Blanck O et al (2019) ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams: Statement from the DEGRO/DGMP working group stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol 195(3):193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1416-xCrossRefPubMed Wilke L, Andratschke N, Blanck O et al (2019) ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams: Statement from the DEGRO/DGMP working group stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol 195(3):193–198. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00066-018-1416-xCrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference D’Agostino G, Franzese C, De Rose F et al (2016) High-quality linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy with flattening filter free beams and volumetric modulated arc therapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. A mono-institutional experience with 90 patients. Clin Oncol 28(12):e173–e178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2016.06.013CrossRef D’Agostino G, Franzese C, De Rose F et al (2016) High-quality linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy with flattening filter free beams and volumetric modulated arc therapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. A mono-institutional experience with 90 patients. Clin Oncol 28(12):e173–e178. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​clon.​2016.​06.​013CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Glowacki G, Majewski W, Wojcieszek P, Grabinska K, Wozniak G, Miszczyk L (2017) Ultrahypofractionated CyberKnifeTM based stereotactic radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer—acute toxicity evaluation in two phase II prospective studies. Neoplasma. https://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2017_421CrossRefPubMed Glowacki G, Majewski W, Wojcieszek P, Grabinska K, Wozniak G, Miszczyk L (2017) Ultrahypofractionated CyberKnifeTM based stereotactic radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer—acute toxicity evaluation in two phase II prospective studies. Neoplasma. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4149/​neo_​2017_​421CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prospective validation of stringent dose constraints for prostatic stereotactic radiation monotherapy: results of a single-arm phase II toxicity-oriented trial
Authors
Paul Nguyen
Ludovic Harzée
Paul Retif
Stéphane Joseph
Guillaume Vogin
Philippe Nickers
Publication date
01-11-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-021-01832-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2021

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 11/2021 Go to the issue