Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

New transperineal ultrasound-guided biopsy for men in whom PSA is increasing after Miles’ operation

Authors: Byung Kwan Park, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hyun Hwan Sung, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Ghee Young Kwon

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Currently, a prostate biopsy is guided by transrectal ultrasound (US) alone. However, this biopsy cannot be performed in men without an anus. The aim of this study was to show the outcomes of a new transperineal US (TPUS)-guided biopsy technique in patients who underwent Miles’ operation.

Methods

Between April 2009 and March 2022, TPUS-guided biopsy was consecutively conducted in 9 patients (median, 71 years; range, 61–78 years) with high prostate-specific antigen values (22.60 ng/mL; 6.19–69.7 ng/mL). Their anuses were all removed due to rectal cancer. TPUS-guided biopsy was performed according to information on prostate magnetic resonance imaging. The technical success rate, cancer detection rate, and complication rate were recorded. Tumor sizes were compared between benign and cancer groups using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction.

Results

The new TPUS-guided biopsy was successfully performed in all patients. Cancer was detected in 77.8% (7/9) of the patients. These were all categorized as PI-RADS 5. Among them, the detection rate of significant cancer (Gleason score 7 or higher) was 66.7% (6/9). The median tumor size was 2.4 cm (1.7–3.1 cm). However, two patients were diagnosed with benign tissue with PI-RADS 3 or PI-RADS 4. Their median tumor size was 1.0 cm (0.8–1.2 cm). There was significant difference between the cancer and benign groups (p = 0.037) in terms of tumor size. Neither post-biopsy bleeding nor infections occurred.

Conclusions

New TPUS-guided biopsy technique may contribute to detecting large PI-RADS 5 prostate cancer in men after Miles’ operation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Streicher J, Meyerson BL, Karivedu V, Sidana A (2019) A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques. Ther Adv Urol 11:1756287219870074–1756287219870074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Streicher J, Meyerson BL, Karivedu V, Sidana A (2019) A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques. Ther Adv Urol 11:1756287219870074–1756287219870074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Robertson NL, Emberton M, Moore CM (2013) MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results. Nat Rev Urol 10:589–597CrossRefPubMed Robertson NL, Emberton M, Moore CM (2013) MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results. Nat Rev Urol 10:589–597CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Park BK (2020) Image-guided prostate biopsy: necessity for terminology standardization. J Ultrasound Med 39:191–196CrossRefPubMed Park BK (2020) Image-guided prostate biopsy: necessity for terminology standardization. J Ultrasound Med 39:191–196CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRefPubMed Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRefPubMed Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Jr., Amin MB, Egevad LL (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242 Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Jr., Amin MB, Egevad LL (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242
8.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol 40:244–252 Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol 40:244–252
9.
go back to reference Ferrari C, Martinez Sanchez C, Bollo J et al (2021) Prone versus supine position in abdominoperineal resection: outcomes in the laparoscopic era. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 31:382–389CrossRefPubMed Ferrari C, Martinez Sanchez C, Bollo J et al (2021) Prone versus supine position in abdominoperineal resection: outcomes in the laparoscopic era. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 31:382–389CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pugliese R, Di Lernia S, Sansonna F et al (2007) Outcomes of laparoscopic Miles’ operation in very low rectal adenocarcinoma. Analysis of 32 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:49–54CrossRefPubMed Pugliese R, Di Lernia S, Sansonna F et al (2007) Outcomes of laparoscopic Miles’ operation in very low rectal adenocarcinoma. Analysis of 32 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:49–54CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mabrouk M, Raimondo D, Del Forno S et al (2018) Pelvic floor muscle assessment on three- and four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in women with ovarian endometriosis with or without retroperitoneal infiltration: a step towards complete functional assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 52:265–268CrossRefPubMed Mabrouk M, Raimondo D, Del Forno S et al (2018) Pelvic floor muscle assessment on three- and four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in women with ovarian endometriosis with or without retroperitoneal infiltration: a step towards complete functional assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 52:265–268CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Thompson JA, O’Sullivan PB, Briffa K, Neumann P, Court S (2005) Assessment of pelvic floor movement using transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 16:285–292CrossRef Thompson JA, O’Sullivan PB, Briffa K, Neumann P, Court S (2005) Assessment of pelvic floor movement using transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 16:285–292CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Park BK (2021) How to Improve TRUS-Guided Target Biopsy following Prostate MRI. Cancers (Basel) 13 Park BK (2021) How to Improve TRUS-Guided Target Biopsy following Prostate MRI. Cancers (Basel) 13
15.
go back to reference Park BK, Park SY (2020) New Biopsy Techniques and Imaging Features of Transrectal Ultrasound for Targeting PI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions. J Clin Med 9 Park BK, Park SY (2020) New Biopsy Techniques and Imaging Features of Transrectal Ultrasound for Targeting PI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions. J Clin Med 9
16.
go back to reference Chung JH, Park BK (2022) Transrectal ultrasound features and biopsy outcomes of transition PI-RADS 5. Acta Radiol 63:559–565CrossRefPubMed Chung JH, Park BK (2022) Transrectal ultrasound features and biopsy outcomes of transition PI-RADS 5. Acta Radiol 63:559–565CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bhanji Y, Allaway MJ, Gorin MA (2021) Recent advances and current role of transperineal prostate biopsy. Urol Clin North Am 48:25–33CrossRefPubMed Bhanji Y, Allaway MJ, Gorin MA (2021) Recent advances and current role of transperineal prostate biopsy. Urol Clin North Am 48:25–33CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X (2019) Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 17:31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X (2019) Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 17:31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Park BK, Kim SH (2007) Transrectal ultrasound performed immediately after prostate biopsy: imaging features and ultrasound-guided compression to bleeding biopsy tract. Acta Radiol 48:232–237CrossRefPubMed Park BK, Kim SH (2007) Transrectal ultrasound performed immediately after prostate biopsy: imaging features and ultrasound-guided compression to bleeding biopsy tract. Acta Radiol 48:232–237CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
New transperineal ultrasound-guided biopsy for men in whom PSA is increasing after Miles’ operation
Authors
Byung Kwan Park
Jae Hoon Chung
Wan Song
Minyong Kang
Hyun Hwan Sung
Hwang Gyun Jeon
Byong Chang Jeong
Seong Il Seo
Seong Soo Jeon
Hyun Moo Lee
Ghee Young Kwon
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01384-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue