Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Review

Do antispasmodics or rectal enemas improve image quality on multiparametric prostate MRI? An ‘Evidence-Based Practice’ review of the literature

Authors: Daniel L. Brennan, Smaro Lazarakis, Allan Lee, Teng H. Tan, Kwang Y. Chin, Sheng F. Oon

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate is increasingly used for the preoperative detection and staging of prostate cancer. Image quality of prostate mpMRI can be significantly degraded by motion related artefact due to bowel peristalsis and susceptibility related artefact, which reduces cancer detection sensitivity. The use of several different methods including anstispasmodic medications and rectal enemas were proposed as potential methods to reduce mpMRI artefacts, but current recommendations in the scientific literature are conflicting and inconsistent. This article seeks to identify the best available evidence to determine which patient preparation method is most effective in improving prostate mpMRI, and provides recommendations for further areas of research. We used the five-step ‘Evidence-Based Practice’ systematic approach of ‘Ask, Search, Appraise, Apply and Evaluate’ described by the McMaster University and National Health Service for critical appraisal of topics. We developed a focused clinical question using a PICO format, and performed a primary and secondary literature search through Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley). All identified articles were appraised for strength and validity. Seven articles were retrieved which demonstrated conflicting sensitivities and specificities for intravenous hyoscine butylbromide and rectal enema in improving image susceptibility artefact, motion artefact, and anatomic distortion on the T2 or diffusion weighted imaging sequences. Intravenous hysoscine butylbromide is the optimum patient preparation method for improving T2W and DWI image quality in prostate mpMRI. The use of a preparatory rectal enema is not currently recommended, but better quality studies are required.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al (2012) International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur. Urol. 61:1079–1092CrossRefPubMed Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al (2012) International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur. Urol. 61:1079–1092CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al (2019) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur. Urol. 76:340–351CrossRefPubMed Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al (2019) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur. Urol. 76:340–351CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference DiCenso A, Bayley L, Haynes B (2009) Accessing pre-appraised evidence: Fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Evid. Based. Nurs. DiCenso A, Bayley L, Haynes B (2009) Accessing pre-appraised evidence: Fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Evid. Based. Nurs.
11.
go back to reference Mielke N, Bullen J, Ward R, et al (2019) Impact of patient preparation on prostate MRI quality. In: Scientific Paper Abstracts Presented at the Society of Abdominal Radiology 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting and Educational Course (March 17–22, 2019, Orlando, Florida). Abdom Radiol 44. pp 3210–3234 Mielke N, Bullen J, Ward R, et al (2019) Impact of patient preparation on prostate MRI quality. In: Scientific Paper Abstracts Presented at the Society of Abdominal Radiology 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting and Educational Course (March 17–22, 2019, Orlando, Florida). Abdom Radiol 44. pp 3210–3234
12.
go back to reference Smith H, Brown D (2018) Is MRI of the prostate degraded by rectal gas distension? In: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists 69th Annual Scientific Meeting. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (2018) 62 (Suppl. S2), 4–84. pp 28–29 Smith H, Brown D (2018) Is MRI of the prostate degraded by rectal gas distension? In: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists 69th Annual Scientific Meeting. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (2018) 62 (Suppl. S2), 4–84. pp 28–29
13.
go back to reference Caglic I, Barrett T (2019) Optimising prostate mpMRI: prepare for success. Clin. Radiol. 74:831–840CrossRefPubMed Caglic I, Barrett T (2019) Optimising prostate mpMRI: prepare for success. Clin. Radiol. 74:831–840CrossRefPubMed
18.
21.
go back to reference McNair HA, Wedlake L, Lips IM, et al (2014) A systematic review: Effectiveness of rectal emptying preparation in prostate cancer patients. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 4:437–447CrossRefPubMed McNair HA, Wedlake L, Lips IM, et al (2014) A systematic review: Effectiveness of rectal emptying preparation in prostate cancer patients. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 4:437–447CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Do antispasmodics or rectal enemas improve image quality on multiparametric prostate MRI? An ‘Evidence-Based Practice’ review of the literature
Authors
Daniel L. Brennan
Smaro Lazarakis
Allan Lee
Teng H. Tan
Kwang Y. Chin
Sheng F. Oon
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02916-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Abdominal Radiology 6/2021 Go to the issue